IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v16y2024i7p219-d1420168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review and Comprehensive Analysis of Pioneering AI Chatbot Models from Education to Healthcare: ChatGPT, Bard, Llama, Ernie and Grok

Author

Listed:
  • Ketmanto Wangsa

    (Independent Researcher, Sydney 2000, Australia)

  • Shakir Karim

    (School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton 4701, Australia)

  • Ergun Gide

    (School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton 4701, Australia)

  • Mahmoud Elkhodr

    (School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton 4701, Australia)

Abstract

AI chatbots have emerged as powerful tools for providing text-based solutions to a wide range of everyday challenges. Selecting the appropriate chatbot is crucial for optimising outcomes. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of five leading chatbots: ChatGPT, Bard, Llama, Ernie, and Grok. The analysis is based on a systematic review of 28 scholarly articles. The review indicates that ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, excels in educational, medical, humanities, and writing applications but struggles with real-time data accuracy and lacks open-source flexibility. Bard, powered by Google, leverages real-time internet data for problem solving and shows potential in competitive quiz environments, albeit with performance variability and inconsistencies in responses. Llama, an open-source model from Meta, demonstrates significant promise in medical contexts, natural language processing, and personalised educational tools, yet it requires substantial computational resources. Ernie, developed by Baidu, specialises in Chinese language tasks, thus providing localised advantages that may not extend globally due to restrictive policies. Grok, developed by Xai and still in its early stages, shows promise in providing engaging, real-time interactions, humour, and mathematical reasoning capabilities, but its full potential remains to be evaluated through further development and empirical testing. The findings underscore the context-dependent utility of each model and the absence of a singularly superior chatbot. Future research should expand to include a wider range of fields, explore practical applications, and address concerns related to data privacy, ethics, security, and the responsible deployment of these technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ketmanto Wangsa & Shakir Karim & Ergun Gide & Mahmoud Elkhodr, 2024. "A Systematic Review and Comprehensive Analysis of Pioneering AI Chatbot Models from Education to Healthcare: ChatGPT, Bard, Llama, Ernie and Grok," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:219-:d:1420168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/7/219/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/7/219/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edisa Lozić & Benjamin Štular, 2023. "Fluent but Not Factual: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Other AI Chatbots’ Proficiency and Originality in Scientific Writing for Humanities," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Marina Jovic & Salaheddine Mnasri, 2024. "Evaluating AI-Generated Emails: A Comparative Efficiency Analysis," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 14(2), pages 502-502, March.
    3. Shakir Karim & Shahadat Uddin & Tasadduq Imam & Mohammad Ali Moni, 2020. "A Systematic Review of Network Studies Based on Administrative Health Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahmoud Elkhodr & Ketmanto Wangsa & Ergun Gide & Shakir Karim, 2024. "A Systematic Review and Multifaceted Analysis of the Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain: Shaping the Future of Australian Higher Education," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher J. Lynch & Erik J. Jensen & Virginia Zamponi & Kevin O’Brien & Erika Frydenlund & Ross Gore, 2023. "A Structured Narrative Prompt for Prompting Narratives from Large Language Models: Sentiment Assessment of ChatGPT-Generated Narratives and Real Tweets," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-36, November.
    2. Sakhi Aggrawal & Alejandra J. Magana, 2024. "Teamwork Conflict Management Training and Conflict Resolution Practice via Large Language Models," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:219-:d:1420168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.