IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v16y2024i10p378-d1501643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review and Multifaceted Analysis of the Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain: Shaping the Future of Australian Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmoud Elkhodr

    (School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton 4701, Australia)

  • Ketmanto Wangsa

    (Independent Researcher, Sydney 2000, Australia)

  • Ergun Gide

    (School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton 4701, Australia)

  • Shakir Karim

    (School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton 4701, Australia)

Abstract

This study explores the applications and implications of blockchain technology in the Australian higher education system, focusing on its integration with artificial intelligence (AI). By addressing critical challenges in credential verification, administrative efficiency, and academic integrity, this integration aims to enhance the global competitiveness of Australian higher education institutions. A comprehensive review of 25 recent research papers quantifies the benefits, challenges, and prospects of blockchain adoption in educational settings. Our findings reveal that 52% of the reviewed papers focus on systematic reviews, 28% focus on application-based studies, and 20% combine both approaches. The keyword analysis identified 287 total words, with “blockchain” and “education” as the most prominent themes. This study highlights blockchain’s potential to improve credential management, academic integrity, administrative efficiency, and funding mechanisms in education. However, challenges such as technical implementation (24%), regulatory compliance (32%), environmental concerns (28%), and data security risks (40%) must be addressed to achieve widespread adoption. This study also discusses critical prerequisites for successful blockchain integration, including infrastructure development, staff training, regulatory harmonisation, and the incorporation of AI for personalised learning. Our research concludes that blockchain, when strategically implemented and combined with AI, has the potential to transform the Australian higher education system, significantly enhancing its integrity, efficiency, and global competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmoud Elkhodr & Ketmanto Wangsa & Ergun Gide & Shakir Karim, 2024. "A Systematic Review and Multifaceted Analysis of the Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain: Shaping the Future of Australian Higher Education," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:378-:d:1501643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/10/378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/10/378/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bratanova, Alexandra & Devaraj, D & Horton, Joanna & Naughtin, Claire & Kloester, Ben & Trinh, Kelly & Weber, Ingo & Dawson, David, 2019. "Blockchain 2030: A Look at the Future of Blockchain in Australia," MPRA Paper 113843, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mahmoud Bidry & Abdellah Ouaguid & Mohamed Hanine, 2023. "Enhancing E-Learning with Blockchain: Characteristics, Projects, and Emerging Trends," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Don Gunasekera & Ernesto Valenzuela, 2020. "Adoption of Blockchain Technology in the Australian Grains Trade: An Assessment of Potential Economic Effects," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 39(2), pages 152-161, June.
    4. Ketmanto Wangsa & Shakir Karim & Ergun Gide & Mahmoud Elkhodr, 2024. "A Systematic Review and Comprehensive Analysis of Pioneering AI Chatbot Models from Education to Healthcare: ChatGPT, Bard, Llama, Ernie and Grok," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Garrard, Robert & Fielke, Simon, 2020. "Blockchain for trustworthy provenances: A case study in the Australian aquaculture industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pandey, Vivekanand & Pant, Millie & Snasel, Vaclav, 2022. "Blockchain technology in food supply chains: Review and bibliometric analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Saleem Malik & Mehmood Chadhar & Savanid Vatanasakdakul & Madhu Chetty, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Organizational Adoption of Blockchain Technology: Extending the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) Framework in the Australian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-33, August.
    3. Peter Sasitharan Gandhi Maniam & Nirmal Acharya & Anne-Marie Sassenberg & Jeffrey Soar, 2024. "Determinants of Blockchain Technology Adoption in the Australian Agricultural Supply Chain: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Chand Bhatt, Priyanka & Kumar, Vimal & Lu, Tzu-Chuen & Daim, Tugrul, 2021. "Technology convergence assessment: Case of blockchain within the IR 4.0 platform," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Hartman, Paul & Ogden, Jeff & Jackson, Ross, 2020. "Contract duration: Barrier or bridge to successful public-private partnerships?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    6. Xiangzhen Peng & Xin Zhang & Xiaoyi Wang & Haisheng Li & Jiping Xu & Zhiyao Zhao, 2022. "Multi-Chain Collaboration-Based Information Management and Control for the Rice Supply Chain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, May.
    7. Lim, Jing Zhi & Toh, Mun-Heng & Xie, Taojun, 2022. "Impact of Digital Economy Agreements on ASEAN Development: Estimates from a CGE Model," Conference papers 333441, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Jamilya Nurgazina & Udsanee Pakdeetrakulwong & Thomas Moser & Gerald Reiner, 2021. "Distributed Ledger Technology Applications in Food Supply Chains: A Review of Challenges and Future Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, April.
    9. Pu, Shuyi & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2023. "The benefits of blockchain for digital certificates: A multiple case study analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Tan, Yiheng & Huang, Xiying & Li, Wei, 2023. "Does blockchain-based traceability system guarantee information authenticity? An evolutionary game approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    11. Ashkan Pakseresht & Sina Ahmadi Kaliji & Vilma Xhakollari, 2022. "How Blockchain Facilitates the Transition toward Circular Economy in the Food Chain?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    12. Jakku, E. & Fleming, A. & Espig, M. & Fielke, S. & Finlay-Smits, S.C. & Turner, J.A., 2023. "Disruption disrupted? Reflecting on the relationship between responsible innovation and digital agriculture research and development at multiple levels in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    13. Lovina Yogarajan & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Mohd Helmi Ali & Norlin Khalid & Lokhman Hakim Osman & Syed Shah Alam, 2023. "Exploring the Hype of Blockchain Adoption in Agri-Food Supply Chain: A Systematic Literature Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, May.
    14. Terhorst, Andrew & Garrard, Robert, 2022. "How unified is the Australian agricultural sector when talking to policy makers about digitalization?," SocArXiv 4nge5, Center for Open Science.
    15. Anandika Sharma & Anupam Sharma & Tarunpreet Bhatia & Rohit Kumar Singh, 2023. "Blockchain enabled food supply chain management: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1594-1618, September.
    16. Ashton de Silva & Mikayla Novak, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Section," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 39(2), pages 101-103, June.
    17. Bai, Chunguang & Zhu, Qingyun & Sarkis, Joseph, 2021. "Joint blockchain service vendor-platform selection using social network relationships: A multi-provider multi-user decision perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    18. Caterina Contini & Fabio Boncinelli & Giovanna Piracci & Gabriele Scozzafava & Leonardo Casini, 2023. "Can blockchain technology strengthen consumer preferences for credence attributes?," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Iskender Peker & Ilker Murat AR & Ismail Erol & Cory Searcy, 2023. "Leveraging blockchain in response to a pandemic through disaster risk management: an IF-MCDM framework," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 642-667, June.
    20. Ingo Weber & Mark Staples, 2022. "Programmable money: next-generation blockchain-based conditional payments," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 109-125, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:378-:d:1501643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.