IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v15y2023i2p73-d1067233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

I4.0I: A New Way to Rank How Involved a Company Is in the Industry 4.0 Era

Author

Listed:
  • Vitória Francesca Biasibetti Zilli

    (Institute of Technology on Semicondutors—itt Chip, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)

  • Cesar David Paredes Crovato

    (Institute of Technology on Semicondutors—itt Chip, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)

  • Rodrigo da Rosa Righi

    (Institute of Technology on Semicondutors—itt Chip, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)

  • Rodrigo Ivan Goytia Mejia

    (Institute of Technology on Semicondutors—itt Chip, University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)

  • Giovani Pesenti

    (HT Micron Semiconductors S.A., São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)

  • Dhananjay Singh

    (ReSENSE Lab, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, HUFS, Seoul 02450, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Cloud, IoT, big data, and artificial intelligence are currently very present in the industrial and academic areas, being drivers of technological revolution. Such concepts are closely related to Industry 4.0, which can be defined as the idea of a flexible, technological, and connected factory, encompassing the shop floor itself and its relationship between workers, the chain of supply, and final products. Some studies have already been developed to quantify a company’s level of maturity within the scope of Industry 4.0. However, there is a lack of a global and unique index that, by receiving as input how many implemented technologies a company has, enables its classification and therefore, comparison with other companies of the same genre. Thus, we present the I4.0I (Industry 4.0 Index), an index that allows companies to measure how far they are in Industry 4.0, enabling competitiveness between factories and stimulating economic and technological growth. To assess the method, companies in the technology sector received and answered a questionnaire in which they marked the technologies they used over the years and the income obtained. The results were used to compare the I4.0I with the profit measured in the same period, proving that the greater the use of technology, the greater the benefits for the company.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitória Francesca Biasibetti Zilli & Cesar David Paredes Crovato & Rodrigo da Rosa Righi & Rodrigo Ivan Goytia Mejia & Giovani Pesenti & Dhananjay Singh, 2023. "I4.0I: A New Way to Rank How Involved a Company Is in the Industry 4.0 Era," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:73-:d:1067233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/2/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/2/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weller, Christian & Kleer, Robin & Piller, Frank T., 2015. "Economic implications of 3D printing: Market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 43-56.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayman Altuwaim & Abdulelah AlTasan & Abdulmohsen Almohsen, 2023. "Success Criteria for Applying Construction Technologies in Residential Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Ioannis Falkonakis & Saeid Lotfian & Baran Yeter, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of an Innovative Additive Manufacturing Technique for Onboard Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Martin Baumers & Luca Beltrametti & Angelo Gasparre & Richard Hague, 2017. "Informing additive manufacturing technology adoption: total cost and the impact of capacity utilisation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(23), pages 6957-6970, December.
    4. Marić, Josip & Opazo-Basáez, Marco & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2023. "Innovation management of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology: Disclosing insights from existing literature and determining future research streams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Turkcan, Hulya & Imamoglu, Salih Zeki & Ince, Huseyin, 2022. "To be more innovative and more competitive in dynamic environments: The role of additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    6. Kumar, Mukesh & Tsolakis, Naoum & Agarwal, Anshul & Srai, Jagjit Singh, 2020. "Developing distributed manufacturing strategies from the perspective of a product-process matrix," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 1-17.
    7. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    8. N. Knofius & M. C. Heijden & A. Sleptchenko & W. H. M. Zijm, 2021. "Improving effectiveness of spare parts supply by additive manufacturing as dual sourcing option," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 189-221, March.
    9. Ding, Jin & Baumers, Martin & Clark, Elizabeth A. & Wildman, Ricky D., 2021. "The economics of additive manufacturing: Towards a general cost model including process failure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    10. Ukobitz, Desirée Valeria & Faullant, Rita, 2022. "The relative impact of isomorphic pressures on the adoption of radical technology: Evidence from 3D printing," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    11. Mohammadreza Akbari & John L. Hopkins, 2022. "Digital technologies as enablers of supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 689-710, December.
    12. Gedas Baranauskas & Agota Giedrė Raišienė & Renata Korsakienė, 2020. "Mapping the Scientific Research on Mass Customization Domain: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    13. David M. Goldberg & Jason K. Deane & Terry R. Rakes & Loren Paul Rees, 2022. "3D Printing Technology and the Market Value of the Firm," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1379-1392, August.
    14. Schniederjans, Dara G., 2017. "Adoption of 3D-printing technologies in manufacturing: A survey analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 287-298.
    15. Beltagui, Ahmad & Gold, Stefan & Kunz, Nathan & Reiner, Gerald, 2023. "Special Issue: Rethinking operations and supply chain management in light of the 3D printing revolution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    16. Eleonora Di Maria & Valentina De Marchi & Ambra Galeazzo, 2022. "Industry 4.0 technologies and circular economy: The mediating role of supply chain integration," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 619-632, February.
    17. Shivam Gupta & Sachin Modgil & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Serena Strazzullo, 2022. "Additive Manufacturing and Green Information Systems as Technological Capabilities for Firm Performance," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 515-534, December.
    18. Jan Holmström & Matthias Holweg & Siavash H. Khajavi & Jouni Partanen, 2016. "The direct digital manufacturing (r)evolution: definition of a research agenda," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, June.
    19. Guo, Shu & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2022. "Self-design fun: Should 3D printing be employed in mass customization operations?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 883-897.
    20. Beltagui, Ahmad & Sesis, Achilleas & Stylos, Nikolaos, 2021. "A bricolage perspective on democratising innovation: The case of 3D printing in makerspaces," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:73-:d:1067233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.