IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v14y2022i3p87-d770105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Handover Management in 5G Vehicular Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Ioannis Kosmopoulos

    (Department of Informatics, University of Piraeus, 80 Karaoli & Dimitriou Str., 18534 Piraeus, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Emmanouil Skondras

    (Department of Informatics, University of Piraeus, 80 Karaoli & Dimitriou Str., 18534 Piraeus, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Angelos Michalas

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, Karamanli & Ligeris, 50131 Kozani, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Emmanouel T. Michailidis

    (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, University of West Attica, Ancient Olive Grove Campus, 250 Thivon & P. Ralli Str., 12241 Egaleo, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Dimitrios D. Vergados

    (Department of Informatics, University of Piraeus, 80 Karaoli & Dimitriou Str., 18534 Piraeus, Greece
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Fifth-Generation (5G) vehicular networks support novel services with increased Quality of Service (QoS) requirements. Vehicular users need to be continuously connected to networks that fulfil the constraints of their services. Thus, the implementation of optimal Handover (HO) mechanisms for 5G vehicular architectures is deemed necessary. This work describes a scheme for performing HOs in 5G vehicular networks using the functionalities of the Media-Independent Handover (MIH) and Fast Proxy Mobile IPv6 (FPMIP) standards. The scheme supports both predictive and reactive HO scenarios. A velocity and alternative network monitoring process prepares each vehicle for both HO cases. In the case of predictive HO, each time the satisfaction grade of the vehicular user drops below a predefined threshold, the HO is initiated. On the other hand, in the case of reactive HO, the vehicle loses the connectivity with its serving network and connects to the available network that has obtained the higher ranking from the network selection process. Furthermore, the HO implementation is based on an improved version of the FPMIPv6 protocol. For the evaluation of the described methodology, a 5G vehicular network architecture was simulated. In this architecture, multiple network access technologies coexist, while the experimental results showed that the proposed scheme outperformed existing HO methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioannis Kosmopoulos & Emmanouil Skondras & Angelos Michalas & Emmanouel T. Michailidis & Dimitrios D. Vergados, 2022. "Handover Management in 5G Vehicular Networks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-42, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:87-:d:770105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/3/87/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/3/87/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Harish & Singh, Manoj Kumar & Gupta, M.P. & Madaan, Jitendra, 2020. "Moving towards smart cities: Solutions that lead to the Smart City Transformation Framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Łukasz Brzeziński & Magdalena Krystyna Wyrwicka, 2022. "Fundamental Directions of the Development of the Smart Cities Concept and Solutions in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-52, November.
    3. Joel Serey & Luis Quezada & Miguel Alfaro & Guillermo Fuertes & Rodrigo Ternero & Gustavo Gatica & Sebastian Gutierrez & Manuel Vargas, 2020. "Methodological Proposals for the Development of Services in a Smart City: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-28, December.
    4. Wojciech Kozlowski & Kacper Suwar, 2021. "Smart City: Definitions, Dimensions, and Initiatives," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 509-520.
    5. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2024. "Culturally Informed Technology: Assessing Its Importance in the Transition to Smart Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Guo, Qingbin & Zhong, Jinrong, 2022. "The effect of urban innovation performance of smart city construction policies: Evaluate by using a multiple period difference-in-differences model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Xinfeng Chang & Jian Su & Zihe Yang, 2022. "The Effect of Digital Economy on Urban Green Transformation—An Empirical Study Based on the Yangtze River Delta City Cluster in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Zhu, Yu-Qian & Alamsyah, Nurwahyu, 2022. "Citizen empowerment and satisfaction with smart city app: Findings from Jakarta," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Secinaro, Silvana & Brescia, Valerio & Lanzalonga, Federico & Santoro, Gabriele, 2022. "Smart city reporting: A bibliometric and structured literature review analysis to identify technological opportunities and challenges for sustainable development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.
    10. Ani MATEI & Elena Alexandra DOBRE, 2021. "Factori cheie si provocari privind guvernanta inteligenta si rolul autoritatilor publice in dezvoltarea ecosistemelor de inovare urbana in cadrul modelului Cvadruplu Helix," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 9, pages 259-276, November.
    11. Vaia Moustaka & Antonios Maitis & Athena Vakali & Leonidas G. Anthopoulos, 2021. "Urban Data Dynamics: A Systematic Benchmarking Framework to Integrate Crowdsourcing and Smart Cities’ Standardization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-43, July.
    12. Maria Kamariotou & Fotis Kitsios, 2022. "Bringing Digital Innovation Strategies and Entrepreneurship: The Business Model Canvas in Open Data Ecosystem and Startups," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, April.
    13. Ward Ooms & Marjolein C. J. Caniëls & Nadine Roijakkers & Dieudonnee Cobben, 2020. "Ecosystems for smart cities: tracing the evolution of governance structures in a dutch smart city initiative," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1225-1258, December.
    14. Paulina Golinska-Dawson & Kanchana Sethanan, 2023. "Sustainable Urban Freight for Energy-Efficient Smart Cities—Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.
    15. Tzu-Hsin Chu & Cheng-Min Chao & Hsieh-Hsi Liu & Der-Fa Chen, 2022. "Developing an Extended Theory of UTAUT 2 Model to Explore Factors Influencing Taiwanese Consumer Adoption of Intelligent Elevators," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    16. Mora, Luca & Gerli, Paolo & Ardito, Lorenzo & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2023. "Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    17. Maja Rosi & Lora Strmsek & Dejan Dragan & Bojan Rosi, 2021. "Walkable Neighbourhoods In Smart Cities," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 21, pages 547-563.
    18. Upadhyay, Nitin & Kamble, Aakash, 2023. "Examining Indian consumer pro-environment purchase intention of electric vehicles: Perspective of stimulus-organism-response," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. Marzena Kramarz & Edyta Przybylska, 2021. "Multimodal Transport in the Context of Sustainable Development of a City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-29, February.
    20. Ehab Shahat & Chang T. Hyun & Chunho Yeom, 2021. "City Digital Twin Potentials: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:87-:d:770105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.