IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v12y2020i12p209-d451339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User Acceptance of Information Feed Advertising: A Hybrid Method Based on SEM and QCA

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Zhao

    (School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Can Yan

    (School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

Abstract

It is of great significance for enterprises’ development to effectively use mobile Internet to carry out information feed advertising. This paper aims to study the influence factors and effect of the users’ acceptance intention of information feed advertising through empirical analysis to provide references for further optimizing information feed advertising strategy. Traditional quantitative analysis methods, such as the Structural Equation Model (SEM), can only measure a single factor’s influence from an individual perspective. Therefore, we introduce the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and present a two-stage hybrid method based on SEM and QCA. In the first stage, we analyze the influence of a single variable on the acceptance intention of information feed advertising by SEM. Then, in the second stage, we analyze the impact of different variable combinations by QCA. Based on the actual questionnaire data, we define six independent variables and use AMOS, SPSS, and fsQCA to carry out SEM analysis and the fuzzy-set-based QCA analysis, respectively. The SEM analysis results show that the four factors (including consistency, informativeness, sociability, and advertising reward) have a significant positive impact on user acceptance of information feed advertising. On the contrary, perceived advertising clustering has a significant negative impact. In addition, accuracy has no considerable effect. The QCA analysis reveals that seven constructs of six variables can all significantly enhance information feed ads’ acceptance intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Zhao & Can Yan, 2020. "User Acceptance of Information Feed Advertising: A Hybrid Method Based on SEM and QCA," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:209-:d:451339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/12/12/209/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/12/12/209/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Urueña, Alberto & Hidalgo, Antonio, 2016. "Successful loyalty in e-complaints: FsQCA and structural equation modeling analyses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1384-1389.
    2. Jie Zhao & Jianfei Wang & Suping Fang & Peiquan Jin, 2018. "Towards Sustainable Development of Online Communities in the Big Data Era: A Study of the Causes and Possible Consequence of Voting on User Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Duarte, Paulo & Pinho, José Carlos, 2019. "A mixed methods UTAUT2-based approach to assess mobile health adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 140-150.
    4. Alonso-Dos-Santos, Manuel & Rejón Guardia, Francisco & Pérez Campos, Carlos & Calabuig-Moreno, Ferran & Ko, Yong Jae, 2018. "Engagement in sports virtual brand communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 273-279.
    5. Campbell, Colin & Evans, Nathaniel J., 2018. "The Role of a Companion Banner and Sponsorship Transparency in Recognizing and Evaluating Article-style Native Advertising," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 17-32.
    6. Miranda, Sandra & Tavares, Patrícia & Queiró, Rita, 2018. "Perceived service quality and customer satisfaction: A fuzzy set QCA approach in the railway sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 371-377.
    7. Gligor, David & Bozkurt, Siddik, 2020. "FsQCA versus regression: The context of customer engagement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chaouali, Walid & Hammami, Samiha Mjahed & Cristóvão Veríssimo, José Manuel & Harris, Lloyd C. & El-Manstrly, Dahlia & Woodside, Arch G., 2022. "Customers who misbehave: Identifying restaurant guests “acting out†via asymmetric case models," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Adrian MICU & Marius GERU & Angela-Eliza MICU, 2017. "Developing Customer Trust in E-Commerce Using Inbound Marketing Strategies," Proceedings RCE 2017, Editura Lumen, vol. 0, pages 522-531, November.
    3. Arfi, Wissal Ben & Nasr, Imed Ben & Kondrateva, Galina & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2021. "The role of trust in intention to use the IoT in eHealth: Application of the modified UTAUT in a consumer context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Guillermo Sanahuja-Peris & Víctor Agulló-Calatayud & Rocío Blay-Arráez, 2021. "David against Goliath: Diagnosis and Strategies for a Niche Sport to Develop a Sustainable Fan Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Xiaowei Jiang & Brandon Mastromartino & Qian Yang & Jianwei Zhang & James J. Zhang, 2022. "Influence of Consumer Interaction and Community Relationships on Value Co-Creation Willingness: A Mediation Model of Chinese Sports Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Zuo, Wenming & Bai, Weijing & Zhu, Wenfeng & He, Xinming & Qiu, Xinxin, 2022. "Changes in service quality of sharing accommodation: Evidence from airbnb," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Gerrath, Maximilian H.E.E. & Usrey, Bryan, 2021. "The impact of influencer motives and commonness perceptions on follower reactions toward incentivized reviews," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 531-548.
    8. Rather, Raouf Ahmad & Raisinghani, Manju & Gligor, David & Parrey, Shakir Hussain & Russo, Ivan & Bozkurt, Sıddık, 2023. "Examining tourist citizenship behaviors through affective, cognitive, behavioral engagement and reputation: Symmetrical and asymmetrical approaches," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Su-Chen(Cecilia) Lin & Mei-Chen Chuang & Chen-Yuan Huang & Chia-En Liu, 2023. "Nursing Staff’s Behavior Intention to Use Mobile Technology: An Exploratory Study Employing the UTAUT 2 Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    10. Honora, Andreawan & Chih, Wen-Hai & Wang, Kai-Yu, 2022. "Managing social media recovery: The important role of service recovery transparency in retaining customers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    11. Shaik, Aqueeb Sohail & Nazrul, Asif & Alshibani, Safiya Mukhtar & Agarwal, Vaishali & Papa, Armando, 2024. "Environmental and economical sustainability and stakeholder satisfaction in SMEs. Critical technological success factors of big data analytics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    12. Alam, Mohammad Zahedul & Hu, Wang & Kaium, Md Abdul & Hoque, Md Rakibul & Alam, Mirza Mohammad Didarul, 2020. "Understanding the determinants of mHealth apps adoption in Bangladesh: A SEM-Neural network approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    13. ben Jabeur, Sami & Mefteh-Wali, Salma & Carmona, Pedro, 2021. "The impact of institutional and macroeconomic conditions on aggregate business bankruptcy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 108-119.
    14. Anand Jhawar & Sanjeev Varshney & Prashant Kumar, 2024. "Sponsorship Disclosure on social media: literature review and future research agenda," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 1589-1617, September.
    15. Anh Thi Nguyen & Alrence S. Halibas & Robert McClelland & Nguyen Hoang Thuan, 2024. "Configurational analysis of conditions influencing customers’ channel switching intention in omnichannel retailing: a fuzzy-set analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 141-178, February.
    16. Cobelli, Nicola & Cassia, Fabio & Donvito, Raffaele, 2023. "Pharmacists' attitudes and intention to adopt telemedicine: Integrating the market-orientation paradigm and the UTAUT," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Ardvin Kester S. Ong, 2022. "A Machine Learning Ensemble Approach for Predicting Factors Affecting STEM Students’ Future Intention to Enroll in Chemistry-Related Courses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Nattakit Yuduang & Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Thanatorn Chuenyindee & Poonyawat Kusonwattana & Waranya Limpasart & Thaninrat Sittiwatethanasiri & Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Josephine D. , 2022. "Factors Influencing the Perceived Effectiveness of COVID-19 Risk Assessment Mobile Application “MorChana” in Thailand: UTAUT2 Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, May.
    19. Riccardo Rialti & Lamberto Zollo & Maria Carmen Laudano & Cristiano Ciappei, 2018. "Social media brand communities and brand value co-creation: Evidences from Italy," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 111-133.
    20. Freya De Keyzer & Nathalie Dens & Patrick De Pelsmacker, 2023. "The processing of native advertising compared to banner advertising: an eye-tracking experiment," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1921-1940, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:209-:d:451339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.