IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jforec/v6y2024i3p35-699d1458948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Wind Speed Forecasting Models: A Comparative Study of CNN, DAN2, Random Forest and XGBOOST in Diverse South African Weather Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Fhulufhelo Walter Mugware

    (Department of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo, South Africa
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Caston Sigauke

    (Department of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo, South Africa
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Thakhani Ravele

    (Department of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou 0950, Limpopo, South Africa)

Abstract

The main source of electricity worldwide stems from fossil fuels, contributing to air pollution, global warming, and associated adverse effects. This study explores wind energy as a potential alternative. Nevertheless, the variable nature of wind introduces uncertainty in its reliability. Thus, it is necessary to identify an appropriate machine learning model capable of reliably forecasting wind speed under various environmental conditions. This research compares the effectiveness of Dynamic Architecture for Artificial Neural Networks (DAN2), convolutional neural networks (CNN), random forest and XGBOOST in predicting wind speed across three locations in South Africa, characterised by different weather patterns. The forecasts from the four models were then combined using quantile regression averaging models, generalised additive quantile regression (GAQR) and quantile regression neural networks (QRNN). Empirical results show that CNN outperforms DAN2 in accurately forecasting wind speed under different weather conditions. This superiority is likely due to the inherent architectural attributes of CNNs, including feature extraction capabilities, spatial hierarchy learning, and resilience to spatial variability. The results from the combined forecasts were comparable with those from the QRNN, which was slightly better than those from the GAQR model. However, the combined forecasts were more accurate than the individual models. These results could be useful to decision-makers in the energy sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Fhulufhelo Walter Mugware & Caston Sigauke & Thakhani Ravele, 2024. "Evaluating Wind Speed Forecasting Models: A Comparative Study of CNN, DAN2, Random Forest and XGBOOST in Diverse South African Weather Conditions," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-28, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:6:y:2024:i:3:p:35-699:d:1458948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/6/3/35/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/6/3/35/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lahouar, A. & Ben Hadj Slama, J., 2017. "Hour-ahead wind power forecast based on random forests," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 529-541.
    2. Gaillard, Pierre & Goude, Yannig & Nedellec, Raphaël, 2016. "Additive models and robust aggregation for GEFCom2014 probabilistic electric load and electricity price forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 1038-1050.
    3. Li, Gong & Shi, Jing, 2010. "On comparing three artificial neural networks for wind speed forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2313-2320, July.
    4. Ghiassi, M. & Saidane, H. & Zimbra, D.K., 2005. "A dynamic artificial neural network model for forecasting time series events," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 341-362.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhong, Mingwei & Xu, Cancheng & Xian, Zikang & He, Guanglin & Zhai, Yanpeng & Zhou, Yongwang & Fan, Jingmin, 2024. "DTTM: A deep temporal transfer model for ultra-short-term online wind power forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    2. Zhang, Yu & Li, Yanting & Zhang, Guangyao, 2020. "Short-term wind power forecasting approach based on Seq2Seq model using NWP data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Feng, Cong & Sun, Mucun & Cui, Mingjian & Chartan, Erol Kevin & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & Zhang, Jie, 2019. "Characterizing forecastability of wind sites in the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1352-1365.
    4. Guangyu Qin & Qingyou Yan & Jingyao Zhu & Chuanbo Xu & Daniel M. Kammen, 2021. "Day-Ahead Wind Power Forecasting Based on Wind Load Data Using Hybrid Optimization Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness & Ahmed A. Ewees & Mohamed Abd Elaziz & Ahmed H. Samak, 2022. "Wind Power Forecasting Using Optimized Dendritic Neural Model Based on Seagull Optimization Algorithm and Aquila Optimizer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Shao, Zhen & Zheng, Qingru & Yang, Shanlin & Gao, Fei & Cheng, Manli & Zhang, Qiang & Liu, Chen, 2020. "Modeling and forecasting the electricity clearing price: A novel BELM based pattern classification framework and a comparative analytic study on multi-layer BELM and LSTM," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    7. Wang, Jianzhou & Xiong, Shenghua, 2014. "A hybrid forecasting model based on outlier detection and fuzzy time series – A case study on Hainan wind farm of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 526-541.
    8. Flores, Juan J. & Graff, Mario & Rodriguez, Hector, 2012. "Evolutive design of ARMA and ANN models for time series forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 225-230.
    9. Uniejewski, Bartosz & Maciejowska, Katarzyna, 2023. "LASSO principal component averaging: A fully automated approach for point forecast pooling," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1839-1852.
    10. Monika Zimmermann & Florian Ziel, 2024. "Efficient mid-term forecasting of hourly electricity load using generalized additive models," Papers 2405.17070, arXiv.org.
    11. Tascikaraoglu, Akin & Sanandaji, Borhan M. & Poolla, Kameshwar & Varaiya, Pravin, 2016. "Exploiting sparsity of interconnections in spatio-temporal wind speed forecasting using Wavelet Transform," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 735-747.
    12. Jonathan Berrisch & Florian Ziel, 2023. "Multivariate Probabilistic CRPS Learning with an Application to Day-Ahead Electricity Prices," Papers 2303.10019, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    13. Yıldıran, Uğur & Kayahan, İsmail, 2018. "Risk-averse stochastic model predictive control-based real-time operation method for a wind energy generation system supported by a pumped hydro storage unit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 631-643.
    14. Yang, Mao & Wang, Da & Xu, Chuanyu & Dai, Bozhi & Ma, Miaomiao & Su, Xin, 2023. "Power transfer characteristics in fluctuation partition algorithm for wind speed and its application to wind power forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 582-594.
    15. Grzegorz Marcjasz & Tomasz Serafin & Rafał Weron, 2018. "Selection of Calibration Windows for Day-Ahead Electricity Price Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Rana Muhammad Adnan & Zhongmin Liang & Xiaohui Yuan & Ozgur Kisi & Muhammad Akhlaq & Binquan Li, 2019. "Comparison of LSSVR, M5RT, NF-GP, and NF-SC Models for Predictions of Hourly Wind Speed and Wind Power Based on Cross-Validation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    17. Marcjasz, Grzegorz & Uniejewski, Bartosz & Weron, Rafał, 2019. "On the importance of the long-term seasonal component in day-ahead electricity price forecasting with NARX neural networks," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1520-1532.
    18. Smyl, Slawek & Hua, N. Grace, 2019. "Machine learning methods for GEFCom2017 probabilistic load forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1424-1431.
    19. Uniejewski, Bartosz & Weron, Rafał, 2021. "Regularized quantile regression averaging for probabilistic electricity price forecasting," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    20. Ata, Rasit, 2015. "Artificial neural networks applications in wind energy systems: a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 534-562.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:6:y:2024:i:3:p:35-699:d:1458948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.