IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jforec/v4y2022i4p53-1003d984417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Lasso and the Factor Zoo-Predicting Expected Returns in the Cross-Section

Author

Listed:
  • Marcial Messmer

    (Department of Economics, School of Economics and Political Science, University of St. Gallen, Bodanstrasse 6, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland)

  • Francesco Audrino

    (Department of Economics, School of Economics and Political Science, University of St. Gallen, Bodanstrasse 6, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland)

Abstract

We investigate whether Lasso-type linear methods are able to improve the predictive accuracy of OLS in selecting relevant firm characteristics for forecasting the future cross-section of stock returns. Through extensive Monte Carlo simulations, we show that Lasso-type predictions are superior to OLS when type II errors are a concern. The results change if the aim is to minimize type I errors. Finally, we analyze the predictive performance of the competing methods on the US cross-section of stock returns between 1974 and 2020 and show that only small and micro-cap stocks are highly predictable throughout the entire sample.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcial Messmer & Francesco Audrino, 2022. "The Lasso and the Factor Zoo-Predicting Expected Returns in the Cross-Section," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-35, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:4:y:2022:i:4:p:53-1003:d:984417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/4/4/53/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/4/4/53/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ang, Andrew & Liu, Jun & Schwarz, Krista, 2020. "Using Stocks or Portfolios in Tests of Factor Models," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(3), pages 709-750, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maysam Khodayari Gharanchaei & Reza Babazadeh, 2024. "Crisis Alpha: A High-Performance Trading Algorithm Tested in Market Downturns," Papers 2409.14510, arXiv.org.
    2. Matias D. Cattaneo & Richard K. Crump & Weining Wang, 2022. "Beta-Sorted Portfolios," Papers 2208.10974, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    3. Laurinaityte, Nora & Meinerding, Christoph & Schlag, Christian & Thimme, Julian, 2024. "GMM weighting matrices in cross-sectional asset pricing tests," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Schlag, Christian & Semenischev, Michael & Thimme, Julian, 2020. "Predictability and the cross-section of expected returns: A challenge for asset pricing models," SAFE Working Paper Series 289, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    5. Sakkas, Athanasios & Urquhart, Andrew, 2024. "Blockchain factors," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Pesaran, M. Hashem & Smith, Ron P., 2023. "Arbitrage pricing theory, the stochastic discount factor and estimation of risk premia from portfolios," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 17-30.
    7. M. Hashem Pesaran & Ron P. Smith, 2021. "Factor Strengths, Pricing Errors, and Estimation of Risk Premia," CESifo Working Paper Series 8947, CESifo.
    8. Jozef Barunik & Michael Ellington, 2020. "Dynamic Network Risk," Papers 2006.04639, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    9. Kwon, Ji Ho & Sohn, Bumjean, 2024. "The ICAPM and empirical pricing factors: A simulation study," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    10. Antoine Giannetti, 2024. "A simple test of misspecification for linear asset pricing models," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 38(3), pages 305-330, September.
    11. Barroso, Pedro & Boons, Martijn & Karehnke, Paul, 2021. "Time-varying state variable risk premia in the ICAPM," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(2), pages 428-451.
    12. M. Hashem Pesaran & Run Smith, 2021. "Arbitrage pricing theory, the stochastic discount factor and estimation of risk premia in portfolios," BCAM Working Papers 2108, Birkbeck Centre for Applied Macroeconomics.
    13. Guillaume Coqueret, 2023. "Forking paths in financial economics," Papers 2401.08606, arXiv.org.
    14. Hibiki Ichiue, 2024. "The Bank of Japan’s Stock Holdings and Long-term Returns," Working Papers on Central Bank Communication 049, University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Economics.
    15. Jiaqi Guo & Peng Li & Youwei Li, 2022. "What Can Explain Momentum? Evidence from Decomposition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 6184-6218, August.
    16. Vafai, Nima & Rakowski, David, 2024. "The sources of portfolio volatility and mutual fund performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Milot Hasaj & Bernd Scherer, 2021. "Covid-19 and smart beta," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 35(4), pages 515-532, December.
    18. Assoe, Kodjovi & Attig, Najah & Sy, Oumar, 2024. "The battle of factors," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    19. Tédongap, Roméo & Tinang, Jules, 2024. "International asset pricing with heterogeneous agents: Estimation and inference," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Christian Schlag & Michael Semenischev & Julian Thimme, 2021. "Predictability and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns: A Challenge for Asset Pricing Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7932-7950, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:4:y:2022:i:4:p:53-1003:d:984417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.