IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jfinte/v2y2023i4p39-717d1274767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Leadership Styles on the Growth of Fintech Start-Ups in Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Progress Choongo

    (Department of Operations and Supply Chain Management, School of Business, The Copperbelt University, Jambo Driver, Kitwe P.O. Box 21692, Zambia)

  • Mungu Chileshe

    (School of Business Graduate Studies, The Copperbelt University, Jambo Driver, Kitwe P.O. Box 21692, Zambia)

  • Christine Nakamba Lesa

    (Department of Operations and Supply Chain Management, School of Business, The Copperbelt University, Jambo Driver, Kitwe P.O. Box 21692, Zambia)

  • Bruce Mwiya

    (Department of Business Administration, School of Business, The Copperbelt University, Jambo Driver, Kitwe P.O. Box 21692, Zambia)

  • Thomas Kweku Taylor

    (School of Business Graduate Studies, The Copperbelt University, Jambo Driver, Kitwe P.O. Box 21692, Zambia)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between the leadership styles of leaders of financial technology (Fintech) start-ups and firm growth. A quantitative design employing a cross-sectional survey with the use of a Likert questionnaire was conducted on the leaders of top-performing Fintech firms in Zambia, as recognized by Tracxn in its May 2020 report. This study focuses on three leadership styles: transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and laissez-faire leadership. The most significant result is that transformational leadership is strongly associated with the growth of Fintech start-ups in Zambia, while transactional leadership plays a limited role. The association between laissez-faire leadership and firm growth is positive but weak. The research makes two main contributions to the literature in the field of Fintech. First, the findings can help researchers explain leadership styles that predict the growth of Fintech start-ups. Second, founders of Fintech firms will understand the most important leadership styles that can lead to the growth of start-ups. The limitations of this study relate to the sample size, the need to consider other readership styles, and the use of qualitative and longitudinal designs that would provide more insights and validation.

Suggested Citation

  • Progress Choongo & Mungu Chileshe & Christine Nakamba Lesa & Bruce Mwiya & Thomas Kweku Taylor, 2023. "The Effect of Leadership Styles on the Growth of Fintech Start-Ups in Zambia," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:2:y:2023:i:4:p:39-717:d:1274767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/2/4/39/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/2/4/39/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hasnan Baber, 2020. "FinTech, Crowdfunding and Customer Retention in Islamic Banks," Vision, , vol. 24(3), pages 260-268, September.
    2. Ms. Inutu Lukonga, 2020. "Harnessing Digital Technologies to Promote SMEs in the MENAP Region," IMF Working Papers 2020/135, International Monetary Fund.
    3. Belaid Rettab & Anis Brik & Kamel Mellahi, 2009. "A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 371-390, October.
    4. Bo Li & Zeshui Xu, 2021. "Insights into financial technology (FinTech): a bibliometric and visual study," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, December.
    5. Dean Shepherd & Johan Wiklund, 2009. "Are we Comparing Apples with Apples or Apples with Oranges? Appropriateness of Knowledge Accumulation across Growth Studies," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 105-123, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B. S. Choudri & Mahad Baawain & Khalifa Al-Zeidi & Hamood Al-Nofli & Rashid Al-Busaidi & Khalifa Al-Fazari, 2017. "Citizen perception on environmental responsibility of the corporate sector in rural areas," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 2565-2576, December.
    2. Gallego-Losada, María-Jesús & Montero-Navarro, Antonio & García-Abajo, Elisa & Gallego-Losada, Rocío, 2023. "Digital financial inclusion. Visualizing the academic literature," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Kibeshi Kiyabo & Nsubili Isaga, 2019. "Strategic entrepreneurship, competitive advantage, and SMEs’ performance in the welding industry in Tanzania," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Broström, Anders & Lööf, Hans & Nabavi, Pardis, 2016. "Inherited Advantage and Spinoff Success," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 437, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    5. Suyun Chen & Yu Ji, 2022. "Do Corporate Social Responsibility Categories Distinctly Influence Innovation? A Resource-Based Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Michael Anyadike-Danes & Mark Hart, 2018. "All grown up? The fate after 15 years of a quarter of a million UK firms born in 1998," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 45-76, January.
    7. Jiyoung Kimjeon & Per Davidsson, 2022. "External Enablers of Entrepreneurship: A Review and Agenda for Accumulation of Strategically Actionable Knowledge," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 643-687, May.
    8. Nguyen Phong Nguyen & Samuel Adomako, 2021. "Environmental proactivity, competitive strategy, and market performance: The mediating role of environmental reputation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2008-2020, May.
    9. Chong Kyoon Lee & Griffin W. Cottle & Sharon A. Simmons & Johan Wiklund, 2021. "Fear not, want not: Untangling the effects of social cost of failure on high-growth entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 531-553, June.
    10. Huang, Shuo, 2022. "Does FinTech improve the investment efficiency of enterprises? Evidence from China’s small and medium-sized enterprises," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 571-586.
    11. Radheshyam Gopinath, 2012. "Understanding the determinants of firm growth in young REITs," ERES eres2012_205, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    12. Yasuyuki Motoyama & Christina Henderson & Morgan Clevenger & Sameeksha Desai & Sehun Oh & Tijs Van Maasakkers, 2023. "Reflections on high growth firms," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(6), pages 617-628, September.
    13. Raiswa Saha & Shashi & Roberto Cerchione & Rajwinder Singh & Richa Dahiya, 2020. "Effect of ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A systematic review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 409-429, March.
    14. Saskia Crucke & Adelien Decramer, 2016. "The Development of a Measurement Instrument for the Organizational Performance of Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, February.
    15. Werner Hölzl & Klaus Friesenbichler, 2010. "High-growth firms, innovation and the distance to the frontier," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 30(2), pages 1016-1024.
    16. Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili, 2020. "Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure, Ownership Structure and Cost of Capital: Evidence from the UAE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    17. Servet Say & Mesut Dogan & Daulen Abdeshov & Murat Tekbas & Levent Sezal & Burhan Erdoğan, 2024. "Evolution of Financial Development Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Kholekile L. Gwebu & Jeffrey Sohl & Jing Wang, 2019. "Differential performance of science park firms: an integrative model," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 193-211, January.
    19. Juan Federico & Joan-Lluis Capelleras, 2015. "The heterogeneous dynamics between growth and profits: the case of young firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 231-253, February.
    20. Ivan Miroshnychenko & Alfredo De Massis & Danny Miller & Roberto Barontini, 2021. "Family Business Growth Around the World," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(4), pages 682-708, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jfinte:v:2:y:2023:i:4:p:39-717:d:1274767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.