IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v8y2015i3p2048-2065d46792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration of a Water Scrubbing Technique and Two-Stage Pressurized Anaerobic Digestion in One Process

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Lemmer

    (State Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Bioenergy, University Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 9, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Yuling Chen

    (State Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Bioenergy, University Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 9, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Anna-Maria Wonneberger

    (DVGW–Research Center at the Engler-Bunte-Institut, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Engler-Bunte-Ring 1, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Frank Graf

    (DVGW–Research Center at the Engler-Bunte-Institut, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Engler-Bunte-Ring 1, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Rainer Reimert

    (Engler-Bunte-Institut, Division Chemical Energy Carriers and Fuel Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Engler-Bunte-Ring 1, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany)

Abstract

Two-stage pressurized anaerobic digestion is a promising technology. This technology integrates in one process biogas production with upgrading and pressure boosting for grid injection. To investigate whether the efficiency of this novel system could be further increased, a water scrubbing system was integrated into the methanogensis step. Therefore, six leach-bed reactors were used for hydrolysis/acidification and a 30-L pressurized anaerobic filter operated at 9 bar was adopted for acetogenesis/methanogenesis. The fermentation liquid of the pressurized anaerobic filter was circulated periodically via a flash tank, operating at atmospheric pressure. Due to the pressure drop, part of dissolved carbon dioxide was released from the liquid phase into the flash tank. The depressurized fermentation liquid was then recycled to the pressurized reactor. Three different flow rates (0 L·day −1 , 20 L·day −1 and 40 L·day −1 ) were tested with three repetitions. As the daily recycled flashed liquid flow was increased from 0 to 40 L, six times as much as the daily feeding, the methane content in the biogas increased from 75 molar percent (mol%) to 87 mol%. The pH value of the substrate in the methane reactor rose simultaneously from 6.5 to 6.7. The experimental data were verified by calculation.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Lemmer & Yuling Chen & Anna-Maria Wonneberger & Frank Graf & Rainer Reimert, 2015. "Integration of a Water Scrubbing Technique and Two-Stage Pressurized Anaerobic Digestion in One Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:3:p:2048-2065:d:46792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/3/2048/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/3/2048/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Szarka, Nora & Scholwin, Frank & Trommler, Marcus & Fabian Jacobi, H. & Eichhorn, Marcus & Ortwein, Andreas & Thrän, Daniela, 2013. "A novel role for bioenergy: A flexible, demand-oriented power supply," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 18-26.
    2. Chen, Yuling & Rößler, Benjamin & Zielonka, Simon & Lemmer, Andreas & Wonneberger, Anna-Maria & Jungbluth, Thomas, 2014. "The pressure effects on two-phase anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 409-415.
    3. Yuling Chen & Benjamin Rößler & Simon Zielonka & Anna-Maria Wonneberger & Andreas Lemmer, 2014. "Effects of Organic Loading Rate on the Performance of a Pressurized Anaerobic Filter in Two-Phase Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Collins, B.A. & Birzer, C.H. & Harris, P.W. & Kidd, S.P. & McCabe, B.K. & Medwell, P.R., 2023. "Two-phase anaerobic digestion in leach bed reactors coupled to anaerobic filters: A review and the potential of biochar filters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    3. Lemmer, Andreas & Merkle, Wolfgang & Baer, Katharina & Graf, Frank, 2017. "Effects of high-pressure anaerobic digestion up to 30 bar on pH-value, production kinetics and specific methane yield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 659-667.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    2. Lemmer, Andreas & Merkle, Wolfgang & Baer, Katharina & Graf, Frank, 2017. "Effects of high-pressure anaerobic digestion up to 30 bar on pH-value, production kinetics and specific methane yield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 659-667.
    3. Pochwatka, Patrycja & Rozakis, Stelios & Kowalczyk-Juśko, Alina & Czekała, Wojciech & Qiao, Wei & Nägele, Hans-Joachim & Janczak, Damian & Mazurkiewicz, Jakub & Mazur, Andrzej & Dach, Jacek, 2023. "The energetic and economic analysis of demand-driven biogas plant investment possibility in dairy farm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Tafarte, Philip & Das, Subhashree & Eichhorn, Marcus & Thrän, Daniela, 2014. "Small adaptations, big impacts: Options for an optimized mix of variable renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 80-92.
    5. Lucas Roth & Özgür Yildiz & Jens Lowitzsch, 2021. "An Empirical Approach to Differences in Flexible Electricity Consumption Behaviour of Urban and Rural Populations—Lessons Learned in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-31, August.
    6. Wang, Guotao & Liao, Qi & Wang, Chang & Liang, Yongtu & Zhang, Haoran, 2022. "Multiperiod optimal planning of biofuel refueling stations: A bi-level game-theoretic approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1152-1165.
    7. Constantin Stan & Gerardo Collaguazo & Constantin Streche & Tiberiu Apostol & Diana Mariana Cocarta, 2018. "Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Co-Digestion of the OFMSW: Improving Biogas Production and Startup," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Philip Tafarte & Marcus Eichhorn & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Capacity Expansion Pathways for a Wind and Solar Based Power Supply and the Impact of Advanced Technology—A Case Study for Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    9. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 1: Upstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1204-1220.
    10. Mauro Lafratta & Matthew Leach & Rex B. Thorpe & Mark Willcocks & Eve Germain & Sabeha K. Ouki & Achame Shana & Jacquetta Lee, 2021. "Economic and Carbon Costs of Electricity Balancing Services: The Need for Secure Flexible Low-Carbon Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Frauke P. C. Müller & Gerd-Christian Maack & Wolfgang Buescher, 2017. "Effects of Biogas Substrate Recirculation on Methane Yield and Efficiency of a Liquid-Manure-Based Biogas Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, March.
    12. Lunz, Benedikt & Stöcker, Philipp & Eckstein, Sascha & Nebel, Arjuna & Samadi, Sascha & Erlach, Berit & Fischedick, Manfred & Elsner, Peter & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2016. "Scenario-based comparative assessment of potential future electricity systems – A new methodological approach using Germany in 2050 as an example," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 555-580.
    13. Yiyun Liu & Jun Wu & Jianjun Li & Jingjing Huang, 2023. "The Diffusion Rule of Demand-Oriented Biogas Supply in Distributed Renewable Energy System: An Evolutionary Game-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Collins, B.A. & Birzer, C.H. & Harris, P.W. & Kidd, S.P. & McCabe, B.K. & Medwell, P.R., 2023. "Two-phase anaerobic digestion in leach bed reactors coupled to anaerobic filters: A review and the potential of biochar filters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    15. Rieke, C. & Stollenwerk, D. & Dahmen, M. & Pieper, M., 2018. "Modeling and optimization of a biogas plant for a demand-driven energy supply," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 657-664.
    16. Lauven, Lars-Peter & Geldermann, Jutta & Desideri, Umberto, 2019. "Estimating the revenue potential of flexible biogas plants in the power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 402-410.
    17. Jåstad, Eirik Ogner & Bolkesjø, Torjus Folsland & Trømborg, Erik & Rørstad, Per Kristian, 2020. "The role of woody biomass for reduction of fossil GHG emissions in the future North European energy sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    18. Begum, Sameena & Ahuja, Shruti & Anupoju, Gangagni Rao & Kuruti, Kranti & Juntupally, Sudharshan & Gandu, Bharath & Ahuja, D.K., 2017. "Process intensification with inline pre and post processing mechanism for valorization of poultry litter through high rate biomethanation technology: A full scale experience," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 428-436.
    19. Lemmer, Andreas & Krümpel, Johannes, 2017. "Demand-driven biogas production in anaerobic filters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 885-894.
    20. Schipfer, F. & Mäki, E. & Schmieder, U. & Lange, N. & Schildhauer, T. & Hennig, C. & Thrän, D., 2022. "Status of and expectations for flexible bioenergy to support resource efficiency and to accelerate the energy transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:3:p:2048-2065:d:46792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.