IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v8y2015i12p12386-13687d59803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Control-Informed Geometric Optimization of Wave Energy Converters: The Impact of Device Motion and Force Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Paula B. Garcia-Rosa

    (Centre for Ocean Energy Research, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland)

  • Giorgio Bacelli

    (Centre for Ocean Energy Research, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland
    Current Address: Water Power Technologies Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87123, USA)

  • John V. Ringwood

    (Centre for Ocean Energy Research, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland)

Abstract

The energy cost for producing electricity via wave energy converters (WECs) is still not competitive with other renewable energy sources, especially wind energy. It is well known that energy maximising control plays an important role to improve the performance of WECs, allowing the energy conversion to be performed as economically as possible. The control strategies are usually subsequently employed on a device that was designed and optimized in the absence of control for the prevailing sea conditions in a particular location. If an optimal unconstrained control strategy, such as pseudo-spectral optimal control (PSOC), is adopted, an overall optimized system can be obtained no matter whether the control design is incorporated at the geometry optimization stage or not. Nonetheless, strategies, such as latching control (LC), must be incorporated at the optimization design stage of the WEC geometry if an overall optimized system is to be realised. In this paper, the impact of device motion and force constraints in the design of control-informed optimized WEC geometries is addressed. The aim is to verify to what extent the constraints modify the connection between the control and the optimal device design. Intuitively, one might expect that if the constraints are very tight, the optimal device shape is the same regardless of incorporating or not the constrained control at the geometry optimization stage. However, this paper tests the hypothesis that the imposition of constraints will limit the control influence on the optimal device shape. PSOC, LC and passive control (PC) are considered in this study. In addition, constrained versions of LC and PC are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Paula B. Garcia-Rosa & Giorgio Bacelli & John V. Ringwood, 2015. "Control-Informed Geometric Optimization of Wave Energy Converters: The Impact of Device Motion and Force Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:12:p:12386-13687:d:59803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/12/12386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/12/12386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Astariz, S. & Iglesias, G., 2015. "The economics of wave energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 397-408.
    2. Henriques, J.C.C. & Lopes, M.F.P. & Gomes, R.P.F. & Gato, L.M.C. & Falcão, A.F.O., 2012. "On the annual wave energy absorption by two-body heaving WECs with latching control," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 31-40.
    3. McCabe, A.P., 2013. "Constrained optimization of the shape of a wave energy collector by genetic algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 274-284.
    4. McCabe, A.P. & Aggidis, G.A. & Widden, M.B., 2010. "Optimizing the shape of a surge-and-pitch wave energy collector using a genetic algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2767-2775.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tom, Nathan M. & Madhi, Farshad & Yeung, Ronald W., 2019. "Power-to-load balancing for heaving asymmetric wave-energy converters with nonideal power take-off," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1208-1225.
    2. Garcia-Teruel, A. & Forehand, D.I.M., 2021. "A review of geometry optimisation of wave energy converters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Bubbar, K. & Buckham, B., 2018. "On establishing an analytical power capture limit for self-reacting point absorber wave energy converters based on dynamic response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 324-338.
    4. Wang, LiGuo & Ringwood, John V., 2021. "Control-informed ballast and geometric optimisation of a three-body hinge-barge wave energy converter using two-layer optimisation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1159-1170.
    5. Rosati, Marco & Ringwood, John V., 2023. "Control co-design of power take-off and bypass valve for OWC-based wave energy conversion systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    6. Wang, LiGuo & Lin, MaoFeng & Tedeschi, Elisabetta & Engström, Jens & Isberg, Jan, 2020. "Improving electric power generation of a standalone wave energy converter via optimal electric load control," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    7. Guo, Bingyong & Ringwood, John V., 2021. "Geometric optimisation of wave energy conversion devices: A survey," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    8. Kamarlouei, Mojtaba & Gaspar, J.F. & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Optimal design of an axisymmetric two-body wave energy converter with translational hydraulic power take-off system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 586-600.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & DuPont, Bryony & Forehand, David I.M., 2021. "Hull geometry optimisation of wave energy converters: On the choice of the objective functions and the optimisation formulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Garcia-Teruel, A. & Forehand, D.I.M., 2021. "A review of geometry optimisation of wave energy converters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Guo, Bingyong & Ringwood, John V., 2021. "Geometric optimisation of wave energy conversion devices: A survey," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    4. Shadmani, Alireza & Nikoo, Mohammad Reza & Gandomi, Amir H. & Chen, Mingjie & Nazari, Rouzbeh, 2024. "Advancements in optimizing wave energy converter geometry utilizing metaheuristic algorithms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Altunkaynak, Abdüsselam & Çelik, Anıl, 2022. "A novel Geno-Nonlinear formula for oscillating water column efficiency estimation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    6. Bao, Jian & Yu, Dingyong, 2024. "Hydrodynamic performance optimization of a cost-effective WEC-type floating breakwater with half-airfoil bottom," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    7. Shadmani, Alireza & Nikoo, Mohammad Reza & Gandomi, Amir H. & Chen, Mingjie, 2024. "An optimization approach for geometry design of multi-axis wave energy converter," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    8. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & DuPont, Bryony & Forehand, David I.M., 2020. "Hull geometry optimisation of wave energy converters: On the choice of the optimisation algorithm and the geometry definition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    9. Silva, Jorge Marques & Vieira, Susana M. & Valério, Duarte & Henriques, João C.C., 2023. "GA-optimized inverse fuzzy model control of OWC wave power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 556-568.
    10. Gradowski, M. & Gomes, R.P.F. & Alves, M., 2020. "Hydrodynamic optimisation of an axisymmetric floating Oscillating Water Column type wave energy converter with an enlarged inner tube," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1519-1532.
    11. Marcos Blanco & Pablo Moreno-Torres & Marcos Lafoz & Dionisio Ramírez, 2015. "Design Parameters Analysis of Point Absorber WEC via an evolutionary-algorithm-based Dimensioning Tool," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-31, October.
    12. Yadong Wen & Weijun Wang & Hua Liu & Longbo Mao & Hongju Mi & Wenqiang Wang & Guoping Zhang, 2018. "A Shape Optimization Method of a Specified Point Absorber Wave Energy Converter for the South China Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Gaspar, José F. & Calvário, Miguel & Kamarlouei, Mojtaba & Soares, C. Guedes, 2018. "Design tradeoffs of an oil-hydraulic power take-off for wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 245-259.
    14. Cuadra, L. & Salcedo-Sanz, S. & Nieto-Borge, J.C. & Alexandre, E. & Rodríguez, G., 2016. "Computational intelligence in wave energy: Comprehensive review and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1223-1246.
    15. Cotten, A. & Forehand, D.I.M., 2020. "Optimisation of a novel, sloped module, multibody wave energy converter, using an efficient modelling technique," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 727-742.
    16. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & Forehand, David I.M., 2022. "Manufacturability considerations in design optimisation of wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 857-873.
    17. Tiesheng Liu & Yanjun Liu & Shuting Huang & Gang Xue, 2022. "Shape Optimization of Oscillating Buoy Wave Energy Converter Based on the Mean Annual Power Prediction Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Mehdi Neshat & Nataliia Y. Sergiienko & Erfan Amini & Meysam Majidi Nezhad & Davide Astiaso Garcia & Bradley Alexander & Markus Wagner, 2020. "A New Bi-Level Optimisation Framework for Optimising a Multi-Mode Wave Energy Converter Design: A Case Study for the Marettimo Island, Mediterranean Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    19. Tunde Aderinto & Hua Li, 2020. "Effect of Spatial and Temporal Resolution Data on Design and Power Capture of a Heaving Point Absorber," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Eva Segura & Rafael Morales & José A. Somolinos, 2017. "Cost Assessment Methodology and Economic Viability of Tidal Energy Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:12:p:12386-13687:d:59803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.