IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i20p7470-d938883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shape Optimization of Oscillating Buoy Wave Energy Converter Based on the Mean Annual Power Prediction Model

Author

Listed:
  • Tiesheng Liu

    (Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266200, China
    Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture, Ministry of Education, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Yanjun Liu

    (Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266200, China
    Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture, Ministry of Education, Jinan 250061, China
    School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
    National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical Engineering Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Shuting Huang

    (Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266200, China
    Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture, Ministry of Education, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Gang Xue

    (Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266200, China
    Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture, Ministry of Education, Jinan 250061, China)

Abstract

In order to improve the energy capture efficiency of an oscillating buoy wave energy converter (WEC), a buoy-shape optimization design method based on the mean annual power prediction model is proposed. According to the statistical data of long-term wave characteristics in the Chinese sea area, the optimal design space is determined. Sixty-three sample points were randomly selected in the optimized space. Based on simulation, the mean annual power corresponding to each sample point is calculated to quantitatively describe the energy capture ability. The response surface method (RSM), radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), and elliptical basis functions neural network (EBFNN) are used to establish the mean annual power prediction models, respectively. By combining the prediction model with the multi-island genetic algorithm (MIGA), the optimal solution in the design space is easily obtained. The reliability of the optimal solution is further proved by quantitative analysis about the influence of optimization parameters on the mean annual captured power. Compared with the common RSM and RBFNN methods, the prediction model established by the EBFNN method has a higher prediction accuracy. In the optimization process, the simulation calculation is replaced by a prediction model, which can effectively solve the problem of high simulation calculation cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiesheng Liu & Yanjun Liu & Shuting Huang & Gang Xue, 2022. "Shape Optimization of Oscillating Buoy Wave Energy Converter Based on the Mean Annual Power Prediction Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7470-:d:938883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7470/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7470/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCabe, A.P., 2013. "Constrained optimization of the shape of a wave energy collector by genetic algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 274-284.
    2. Mathiesen, Brian Vad & Lund, Henrik & Karlsson, Kenneth, 2011. "100% Renewable energy systems, climate mitigation and economic growth," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 488-501, February.
    3. Berenjkoob, Mahdi Nazari & Ghiasi, Mahmoud & Soares, C.Guedes, 2021. "Influence of the shape of a buoy on the efficiency of its dual-motion wave energy conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    4. Mehdi Neshat & Nataliia Y. Sergiienko & Seyedali Mirjalili & Meysam Majidi Nezhad & Giuseppe Piras & Davide Astiaso Garcia, 2021. "Multi-Mode Wave Energy Converter Design Optimisation Using an Improved Moth Flame Optimisation Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Shadman, Milad & Estefen, Segen F. & Rodriguez, Claudio A. & Nogueira, Izabel C.M., 2018. "A geometrical optimization method applied to a heaving point absorber wave energy converter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 533-546.
    6. Goggins, Jamie & Finnegan, William, 2014. "Shape optimisation of floating wave energy converters for a specified wave energy spectrum," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 208-220.
    7. Garcia-Teruel, A. & Forehand, D.I.M., 2021. "A review of geometry optimisation of wave energy converters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    8. McCabe, A.P. & Aggidis, G.A. & Widden, M.B., 2010. "Optimizing the shape of a surge-and-pitch wave energy collector using a genetic algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2767-2775.
    9. Jin, Siya & Greaves, Deborah, 2021. "Wave energy in the UK: Status review and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    10. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & DuPont, Bryony & Forehand, David I.M., 2021. "Hull geometry optimisation of wave energy converters: On the choice of the objective functions and the optimisation formulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    11. Andrea Farkas & Nastia Degiuli & Ivana Martić, 2019. "Assessment of Offshore Wave Energy Potential in the Croatian Part of the Adriatic Sea and Comparison with Wind Energy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shadmani, Alireza & Nikoo, Mohammad Reza & Gandomi, Amir H. & Chen, Mingjie & Nazari, Rouzbeh, 2024. "Advancements in optimizing wave energy converter geometry utilizing metaheuristic algorithms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & DuPont, Bryony & Forehand, David I.M., 2021. "Hull geometry optimisation of wave energy converters: On the choice of the objective functions and the optimisation formulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    3. Garcia-Teruel, A. & Forehand, D.I.M., 2021. "A review of geometry optimisation of wave energy converters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Yadong Wen & Weijun Wang & Hua Liu & Longbo Mao & Hongju Mi & Wenqiang Wang & Guoping Zhang, 2018. "A Shape Optimization Method of a Specified Point Absorber Wave Energy Converter for the South China Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & Forehand, David I.M., 2022. "Manufacturability considerations in design optimisation of wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 857-873.
    6. Guo, Bingyong & Ringwood, John V., 2021. "Geometric optimisation of wave energy conversion devices: A survey," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    7. Wang, LiGuo & Ringwood, John V., 2021. "Control-informed ballast and geometric optimisation of a three-body hinge-barge wave energy converter using two-layer optimisation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1159-1170.
    8. Marcos Blanco & Pablo Moreno-Torres & Marcos Lafoz & Dionisio Ramírez, 2015. "Design Parameters Analysis of Point Absorber WEC via an evolutionary-algorithm-based Dimensioning Tool," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-31, October.
    9. Alireza Shadmani & Mohammad Reza Nikoo & Riyadh I. Al-Raoush & Nasrin Alamdari & Amir H. Gandomi, 2022. "The Optimal Configuration of Wave Energy Conversions Respective to the Nearshore Wave Energy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-29, October.
    10. Shadmani, Alireza & Nikoo, Mohammad Reza & Gandomi, Amir H., 2024. "Adaptive systematic optimization of a multi-axis ocean wave energy converter," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    11. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & Roberts, Owain & Noble, Donald R. & Henderson, Jillian Catherine & Jeffrey, Henry, 2022. "Design limits for wave energy converters based on the relationship of power and volume obtained through multi-objective optimisation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 492-504.
    12. Mehdi Neshat & Nataliia Y. Sergiienko & Erfan Amini & Meysam Majidi Nezhad & Davide Astiaso Garcia & Bradley Alexander & Markus Wagner, 2020. "A New Bi-Level Optimisation Framework for Optimising a Multi-Mode Wave Energy Converter Design: A Case Study for the Marettimo Island, Mediterranean Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    13. He, Zechen & Ning, Dezhi & Gou, Ying & Zhou, Zhimin, 2022. "Wave energy converter optimization based on differential evolution algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    14. Altunkaynak, Abdüsselam & Çelik, Anıl, 2022. "A novel Geno-Nonlinear formula for oscillating water column efficiency estimation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    15. Bao, Jian & Yu, Dingyong, 2024. "Hydrodynamic performance optimization of a cost-effective WEC-type floating breakwater with half-airfoil bottom," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    16. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & DuPont, Bryony & Forehand, David I.M., 2020. "Hull geometry optimisation of wave energy converters: On the choice of the optimisation algorithm and the geometry definition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    17. Silva, Jorge Marques & Vieira, Susana M. & Valério, Duarte & Henriques, João C.C., 2023. "GA-optimized inverse fuzzy model control of OWC wave power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 556-568.
    18. Tunde Aderinto & Hua Li, 2018. "Ocean Wave Energy Converters: Status and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Tunde Aderinto & Hua Li, 2019. "Review on Power Performance and Efficiency of Wave Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-24, November.
    20. Gaspar, José F. & Calvário, Miguel & Kamarlouei, Mojtaba & Soares, C. Guedes, 2018. "Design tradeoffs of an oil-hydraulic power take-off for wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 245-259.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7470-:d:938883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.