IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i6p1359-d1609079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solid Wastes from Geothermal Energy Production and Implications for Direct Lithium Extraction

Author

Listed:
  • William T. Stringfellow

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Energy Geoscience Division, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
    School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Ave., Stockton, CA 95211, USA)

  • Mary Kay Camarillo

    (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Energy Geoscience Division, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
    School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Ave., Stockton, CA 95211, USA)

Abstract

Direct lithium extraction (DLE) of brines after geothermal power production offers opportunities to produce environmentally benign “green” lithium; however, some environmental impact is inevitable. We examined solid waste production at geothermal power plants in southern California that are also locations for planned DLE facilities. Currently, the geothermal plants in this region produce approximately 79,800 metric tons (wet weight) per year of solid waste, which represents about 28 metric tons per GWh of net electricity production or approximately 500 mg solids per kg geothermal brine. Approximately 15% of this waste requires management as hazardous waste. Solids produced during power production represent about 0.2% of the total dissolved solids in the brine. Lithium production will require the removal of silica, iron, and other metals as part of the DLE process. Using a mass balance approach, we calculate that precipitation of silica and metals could produce up to an additional 6800 mg solids per kg brine. Calcium occurs at very high concentrations, and the amount of solids disposed in landfills will be dependent on the amount of calcium removed during lithium recovery. Our analysis shows that evaluation of brine chemistry in the context of the DLE process is useful for evaluating the potential solid waste impacts of producing lithium from brines.

Suggested Citation

  • William T. Stringfellow & Mary Kay Camarillo, 2025. "Solid Wastes from Geothermal Energy Production and Implications for Direct Lithium Extraction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:1359-:d:1609079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/6/1359/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/6/1359/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laurence Kavanagh & Jerome Keohane & Guiomar Garcia Cabellos & Andrew Lloyd & John Cleary, 2018. "Global Lithium Sources—Industrial Use and Future in the Electric Vehicle Industry: A Review," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Sigurjónsson, Hafþór Ægir & Cook, David & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur & Bogason, Sigurður G., 2021. "A life-cycle analysis of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1076-1086.
    3. Sun, Xin & Hao, Han & Zhao, Fuquan & Liu, Zongwei, 2017. "Tracing global lithium flow: A trade-linked material flow analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 50-61.
    4. János Szanyi & Ladislaus Rybach & Hawkar A. Abdulhaq, 2023. "Geothermal Energy and Its Potential for Critical Metal Extraction—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Pranjal Barman & Lachit Dutta & Brian Azzopardi, 2023. "Electric Vehicle Battery Supply Chain and Critical Materials: A Brief Survey of State of the Art," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Ping & Gao, Xiangyun & Zhao, Yiran & Jia, Nanfei & Dong, Xiaojuan, 2021. "Lithium resource allocation optimization of the lithium trading network based on material flow," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Pranjal Barman & Lachit Dutta & Brian Azzopardi, 2023. "Electric Vehicle Battery Supply Chain and Critical Materials: A Brief Survey of State of the Art," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Erick C. Jones, 2024. "Lithium Supply Chain Optimization: A Global Analysis of Critical Minerals for Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-31, May.
    4. Wang, Wei & Wu, Yufeng, 2017. "An overview of recycling and treatment of spent LiFePO4 batteries in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 233-243.
    5. Bledea, Cosmin Codruț & Pop, Izabela Luiza & Toader, Rita Monica, 2022. "The effects on the economy and environment caused by electric cars compared to the conventional ones," MPRA Paper 118639, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Ewa Knapik & Grzegorz Rotko & Marta Marszałek & Marcin Piotrowski, 2023. "Comparative Study on Lithium Recovery with Ion-Selective Adsorbents and Extractants: Results of Multi-Stage Screening Test with the Use of Brine Simulated Solutions with Increasing Complexity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Wang, Xue-Chao & Jiang, Peng & Yang, Lan & Fan, Yee Van & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Wang, Yutao, 2021. "Extended water-energy nexus contribution to environmentally-related sustainable development goals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Shao, Liuguo & Hu, Jianying & Zhang, Hua, 2021. "Evolution of global lithium competition network pattern and its influence factors," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Zhiyong Zhou & Jianhui Huang & Ming Li & Yao Lu, 2022. "The Dynamic Evolution of the Material Flow of Lithium Resources in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Liu, Donghui & Gao, Xiangyun & An, Haizhong & Jia, Nanfei & Wang, Anjian, 2024. "Exploring market instability of global lithium resources based on chaotic dynamics analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Olabi, A.G. & Wilberforce, Tabbi & Sayed, Enas Taha & Abo-Khalil, Ahmed G. & Maghrabie, Hussein M. & Elsaid, Khaled & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2022. "Battery energy storage systems and SWOT (strengths, weakness, opportunities, and threats) analysis of batteries in power transmission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    12. Elisa Alonso & David Pineault & Nedal T. Nassar, 2023. "Streamlined approach for assessing embedded consumption of lithium and cobalt in the United States," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 33-42, February.
    13. Nebojša Stefanović & Nataša Danilović Hristić & Jasna Petrić, 2023. "Spatial Planning, Environmental Activism, and Politics—Case Study of the Jadar Project for Lithium Exploitation in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Kai Li & Qiudan Su & Xiaofan Ma & Haifeng Zhang, 2023. "Research on Lithium Technology Safety Issues: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    15. Solano-Olivares, K. & Santoyo, E. & Santoyo-Castelazo, E., 2024. "Integrated sustainability assessment framework for geothermal energy technologies: A literature review and a new proposal of sustainability indicators for Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Sun, Xin & Jiao, Yang & Hao, Han & Liu, Zongwei & Zhao, Fuquan, 2024. "Physical and monetary characterization of global nickel flow network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Cherepovitsyn, Alexey & Solovyova, Victoria & Dmitrieva, Diana, 2023. "New challenges for the sustainable development of the rare-earth metals sector in Russia: Transforming industrial policies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Hao, Hongchang & Ma, Zhe & Wang, Anjian & Xing, Wanli & Song, Hao & Zhao, Pei & Wei, Jiangqiao & Zheng, Shuxian, 2023. "Modeling and assessing the robustness of the lithium global trade system against cascading failures," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    19. Golmohammadzadeh, Rabeeh & Faraji, Fariborz & Jong, Brian & Pozo-Gonzalo, Cristina & Banerjee, Parama Chakraborty, 2022. "Current challenges and future opportunities toward recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    20. János Szanyi & Ladislaus Rybach & Hawkar A. Abdulhaq, 2023. "Geothermal Energy and Its Potential for Critical Metal Extraction—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-28, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:1359-:d:1609079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.