IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i5p1268-d1605679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitiveness Strategies and Technical Innovations in Light-Water Small Modular Reactor Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Ludwik Pieńkowski

    (Faculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

It is widely recognized that economies of scale enhance the competitiveness of large-scale nuclear reactors compared to light-water small modular reactors (SMRs). As such, choosing an appropriate strategy to enhance competitiveness is crucial for the future of SMRs. Their development is still in the early stages, and among the leading projects, two distinct approaches to technical innovation can be observed. In some projects, technical innovations are rejected because they are perceived as triggers for risky, costly, and long-term processes. In short, this means that the competitive advantage is based primarily on modular design and the benefits of long production runs, which might require at least a few successful implementations. Examples of this approach include the Westinghouse AP300 and Rolls-Royce SMR designs. In other projects, technical innovations are viewed as a means to achieve substantial cost reductions. Here, the initial challenge is to prove that the proposed solutions are safe. Next, it must be demonstrated that their implementation and operation meet the designers’ expectations. These goals can be achieved with the first implementation. Such an approach is exemplified, for instance, in the NuScale and GEH BWRX-300 projects. Currently, available economic analyses show that it is challenging not only to identify the most promising SMR projects but also to determine which approach to technical innovation will ultimately be more effective. Therefore, it is worth examining how leading SMR projects have improved their competitiveness. Additionally, it is important to remember that, even if light-water SMRs are not deployed, it is likely that some of their innovative solutions will be incorporated into other advanced nuclear power plant designs and potentially applied beyond the nuclear industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludwik Pieńkowski, 2025. "Competitiveness Strategies and Technical Innovations in Light-Water Small Modular Reactor Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-10, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1268-:d:1605679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Semin Joo & Seok Ho Song & Seokjun Oh & Staffan Qvist & Jeong Ik Lee, 2024. "Evaluation of Coal Repowering Option with Small Modular Reactor in South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-32, December.
    2. Katarzyna Kiegiel & Dagmara Chmielewska-Śmietanko & Irena Herdzik-Koniecko & Agnieszka Miśkiewicz & Tomasz Smoliński & Marcin Rogowski & Albert Ntang & Nelson Kiprono Rotich & Krzysztof Madaj & Andrze, 2025. "The Future of Nuclear Energy: Key Chemical Aspects of Systems for Developing Generation III+, Generation IV, and Small Modular Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-53, January.
    3. Stewart, W.R. & Shirvan, K., 2022. "Capital cost estimation for advanced nuclear power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aman Gupta & Piyush Sabharwall & Paul D. Armatis & Brian M. Fronk & Vivek Utgikar, 2022. "Coupling Chemical Heat Pump with Nuclear Reactor for Temperature Amplification by Delivering Process Heat and Electricity: A Techno-Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Hui, Jiuwu & Lee, Yi-Kuen & Yuan, Jingqi, 2023. "Load following control of a PWR with load-dependent parameters and perturbations via fixed-time fractional-order sliding mode and disturbance observer techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck & Lund, Henrik & Mathiesen, Brian Vad & Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Sorknæs, Peter & Nielsen, Steffen & Madsen, Poul Thøis & Andresen, Gorm Bruun, 2024. "Cost and system effects of nuclear power in carbon-neutral energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    4. Hui Liu & Nazirah Zainul Abidin, 2024. "A Review on Research of Prefabricated Building Costs: Exploring Collaborations, Intellectual Basis, and Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-30, November.
    5. Asuega, Anthony & Limb, Braden J. & Quinn, Jason C., 2023. "Techno-economic analysis of advanced small modular nuclear reactors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    6. Pablo Fernández-Arias & Diego Vergara & Álvaro Antón-Sancho, 2023. "Bibliometric Review and Technical Summary of PWR Small Modular Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Okunlola, Ayodeji & Davis, Matthew & Kumar, Amit, 2023. "Assessing the cost competitiveness of electrolytic hydrogen production from small modular nuclear reactor-based power plants: A price-following perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    8. Van Hee, Nick & Peremans, Herbert & Nimmegeers, Philippe, 2024. "Economic potential and barriers of small modular reactors in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    9. Hui, Jiuwu, 2024. "Coordinated discrete-time super-twisting sliding mode controller coupled with time-delay estimator for PWR-based nuclear steam supply system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    10. Li, Zhen & Qi, Mingliang & Wang, Renlong & Yan, Xuesong & Yang, Yangyang & Gao, Mingang, 2024. "A novel cost analysis method for accelerator driven advanced nuclear energy system (ADANES) considering uncertainty throughout the R&D cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    11. Patrycjusz Zarębski & Dominik Katarzyński, 2023. "Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) as a Solution for Renewable Energy Gaps: Spatial Analysis for Polish Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-23, September.
    12. Mulako D. Mukelabai & K. G. U. Wijayantha & Richard E. Blanchard, 2022. "Hydrogen for Cooking: A Review of Cooking Technologies, Renewable Hydrogen Systems and Techno-Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-30, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1268-:d:1605679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.