IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i5p1175-d1601690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency of Renewable Energy Potential Utilization in European Union: Towards Responsible Net-Zero Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Ewa Chodakowska

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Joanicjusz Nazarko

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Łukasz Nazarko

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

Abstract

This study evaluates the efficiency of EU countries in utilizing their geographical potential for wind and solar energy production. A two-stage radial network data envelopment analysis (NDEA) is used to estimate the efficiency of the utilization of natural resources. The research is of a computational-empirical nature on the basis of publicly available data. The basic variables included in the model are: mean wind speed, Global Horizontal Irradiance, population, land area, wind energy capacity, solar PV capacity, wind energy generation, and solar power generation. The relationship between the environmental potential and the installed power capacity is evaluated in the first stage. In the second stage, the actual production from the installed capacity is analyzed. The efficiency trends over time are also investigated. This approach offers a comprehensive assessment by considering both the technical performance and environmental constraints. Considering all studied countries together, a slight increase in the relative efficiency of renewable energy potential utilization is observed—from 23.2% in 2018 to 28.7% in 2022. Germany and the Netherlands achieved 100% relative efficiency in 2022. The results reveal that the development of alternative energy sources and the efficiency of the installed power capacity utilization are not always in line with the local environmental conditions. The average efficiency of the analyzed countries from this perspective was 26.8% in 2018, with an improvement to 37.4% in 2022. The relative efficiency of the installed capacity utilization was high in both periods (76.3% and 74.9%, respectively). The impact of exogenous variables on performance (GDP and R&D expenditures) is discussed. Broader implications of the results for a responsible renewable energy policy in the EU demonstrate the need to combine overarching targets with a flexible governance system. That flexibility should allow for individual energy transition pathways, cooperative mechanisms, market integration, and targeted funding in order to account for the diversity of renewable resource utilization potentials among countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewa Chodakowska & Joanicjusz Nazarko & Łukasz Nazarko, 2025. "Efficiency of Renewable Energy Potential Utilization in European Union: Towards Responsible Net-Zero Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-30, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1175-:d:1601690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1175/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1175/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tenente, Marcos & Henriques, Carla & da Silva, Patrícia Pereira, 2020. "Eco-efficiency assessment of the electricity sector: Evidence from 28 European Union countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 293-314.
    2. Khezrimotlagh, Dariush & Kaffash, Sepideh & Zhu, Joe, 2022. "U.S. airline mergers’ performance and productivity change," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Chia-Nan Wang & Hector Tibo & Duy Hung Duong, 2020. "Renewable Energy Utilization Analysis of Highly and Newly Industrialized Countries Using an Undesirable Output Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Zhongfei Chen & Stavros Kourtzidis & Panayiotis Tzeremes & Nickolaos Tzeremes, 2022. "A robust network DEA model for sustainability assessment: an application to Chinese Provinces," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 235-262, March.
    5. Zhou, Haibo & Yang, Yi & Chen, Yao & Zhu, Joe, 2018. "Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins, development and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 1-16.
    6. Iftikhar, Yaser & Wang, Zhaohua & Zhang, Bin & Wang, Bo, 2018. "Energy and CO2 emissions efficiency of major economies: A network DEA approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 197-207.
    7. Papież, Monika & Śmiech, Sławomir & Frodyma, Katarzyna, 2019. "Factors affecting the efficiency of wind power in the European Union countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 965-977.
    8. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2009. "Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 243-252, August.
    9. Hoogwijk, Monique & de Vries, Bert & Turkenburg, Wim, 2004. "Assessment of the global and regional geographical, technical and economic potential of onshore wind energy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 889-919, September.
    10. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    11. Olawale Ogunrinde & Ekundayo Shittu, 2023. "Benchmarking performance of photovoltaic power plants in multiple periods," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 489-503, September.
    12. García-Álvarez, María Teresa & Cabeza-García, Laura & Soares, Isabel, 2018. "Assessment of energy policies to promote photovoltaic generation in the European Union," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 864-874.
    13. Rolf Färe & Gerald Whittaker, 1995. "An Intermediate Input Model Of Dairy Production Using Complex Survey Data," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 201-213, May.
    14. Beata Gavurova & Kristina Kocisova & Jakub Sopko, 2021. "Health system efficiency in OECD countries: dynamic network DEA approach," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Li, Shin-Je & Chang, Ting-Huan & Chang, Ssu-Li, 2017. "The policy effectiveness of economic instruments for the photovoltaic and wind power development in the European Union," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 660-666.
    16. Zhang, Tiantian & Nakagawa, Kei & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi, 2023. "Evaluating solar photovoltaic power efficiency based on economic dimensions for 26 countries using a three-stage data envelopment analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    17. Perpiña Castillo, Carolina & Batista e Silva, Filipe & Lavalle, Carlo, 2016. "An assessment of the regional potential for solar power generation in EU-28," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 86-99.
    18. Olga Orynycz & Paweł Ruchała & Karol Tucki & Andrzej Wasiak & Máté Zöldy, 2024. "A Theoretical Analysis of Meteorological Data as a Road towards Optimizing Wind Energy Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Ewa Chodakowska & Łukasz Nazarko, 2022. "Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Wang, Qiang & Jiang, Feng & Li, Rongrong, 2022. "Assessing supply chain greenness from the perspective of embodied renewable energy – A data envelopment analysis using multi-regional input-output analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1292-1305.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olawale Ogunrinde & Ekundayo Shittu, 2023. "Benchmarking performance of photovoltaic power plants in multiple periods," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 489-503, September.
    2. Chen, Kuan-Chen & Lin, Sun-Yuan & Yu, Ming-Miin, 2022. "Exploring the efficiency of hospital and pharmacy utilizations in Taiwan: An application of dynamic network data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Lu, Wen-Min & Liu, John S. & Kweh, Qian Long & Wang, Chung-Wei, 2016. "Exploring the benchmarks of the Taiwanese investment trust corporations: Management and investment efficiency perspectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 607-618.
    4. AGRELL, Per & HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel, 2011. "Frontier-based performance analysis models for supply chain management; state of the art and research directions," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2011069, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. Filip Fidanoski & Kiril Simeonovski & Violeta Cvetkoska, 2021. "Energy Efficiency in OECD Countries: A DEA Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Huang, Tai-Hsin & Chen, Kuan-Chen & Lin, Chung-I, 2018. "An extension from network DEA to copula-based network SFA: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banks in 2009," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 51-62.
    7. Sheng-Hsiung Chiu & Tzu-Yu Lin & Hai-Lan Yang, 2020. "Measuring Energy Performance for Regional Sustainable Development in China: A New Framework based on a Dynamic Two-Stage SBM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Habib Zare Ahmadabadi & Fatemeh Zamzam & Ali Emrouznejad & Alireza Naser Sadrabadi & Ali Morovati Sharifabadi, 2024. "A modified distance friction minimization model with optimistic–pessimistic target orientation for OECD sustainable performance measurement," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 23113-23149, September.
    9. Kai He & Nan Zhu & Wu Jiang & Chuanjin Zhu, 2022. "Efficiency Evaluation of Chinese Provincial Industrial System Based on Network DEA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Tatiana Bencova & Andrea Bohacikova, 2022. "DEA in Performance Measurement of Two-Stage Processes: Comparative Overview of the Literature," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 111-129.
    11. Galagedera, Don U.A. & Watson, John & Premachandra, I.M. & Chen, Yao, 2016. "Modeling leakage in two-stage DEA models: An application to US mutual fund families," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 62-77.
    12. Victor Moutinho & Mara Madaleno, 2021. "A Two-Stage DEA Model to Evaluate the Technical Eco-Efficiency Indicator in the EU Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Cook, Wade D. & Liang, Liang & Zhu, Joe, 2010. "Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 423-430, December.
    14. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    15. Duygun, Meryem & Prior, Diego & Shaban, Mohamed & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2016. "Disentangling the European airlines efficiency puzzle: A network data envelopment analysis approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 2-14.
    16. Alves, André Bernardo & Wanke, Peter & Antunes, Jorge & Chen, Zhongfei, 2020. "Endogenous network efficiency, macroeconomy, and competition: Evidence from the Portuguese banking industry," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    17. Premachandra, I.M. & Zhu, Joe & Watson, John & Galagedera, Don U.A., 2012. "Best-performing US mutual fund families from 1993 to 2008: Evidence from a novel two-stage DEA model for efficiency decomposition," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3302-3317.
    18. Chen, Zhongfei & Wanke, Peter & Antunes, Jorge Junio Moreira & Zhang, Ning, 2017. "Chinese airline efficiency under CO2 emissions and flight delays: A stochastic network DEA model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 89-108.
    19. Kelly D.T.Trinh & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2015. "Bootstrap-based testing for network DEA: Some Theory and Applications," CEPA Working Papers Series WP052015, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    20. Mohammad Amirkhan & Hosein Didehkhani & Kaveh Khalili-Damghani & Ashkan Hafezalkotob, 2018. "Measuring Performance of a Three-Stage Network Structure Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Nash Bargaining Game: A Supply Chain Application," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(05), pages 1429-1467, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1175-:d:1601690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.