IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i5p1049-d1596704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low-Carbon Development Strategies for Power Generation Expansion in Sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from an Optimisation-Based Analysis for Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Xavier S. Musonye

    (School of Technology, Department of Engineering, Reykjavik University, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland
    GRÓ-Geothermal Training Program, 203 Kópavogur, Iceland
    Kenya Electricity Generating Company, Pension Plaza-Ngara, Nairobi P.O. Box 47936, Kenya)

  • Brynhildur Davíðsdóttir

    (Environment and Natural Resources, School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland)

  • Ragnar Kristjánsson

    (School of Technology, Department of Engineering, Reykjavik University, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland)

  • Eyjólfur I. Ásgeirsson

    (School of Technology, Department of Engineering, Reykjavik University, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland)

  • Hlynur Stefánsson

    (School of Technology, Department of Engineering, Reykjavik University, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland)

Abstract

Energy production and consumption are major contributors to global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Sub-Saharan African countries face the challenge of harnessing diverse energy sources to meet rising demand affordably while curbing emissions. This study uses the optimisation-based Kenya-TIMES model to explore low-carbon strategies for Kenya’s power generation from 2020 to 2050. A business-as-usual (BAU) scenario is compared with four low-carbon scenarios: carbon tax, renewable portfolio standard, renewable energy subsidies, and a hybrid of subsidies and carbon tax. The analysis reveals that geothermal, wind, and hydropower dominate the energy mix until 2035 across all scenarios. After 2035, coal capacity in the BAU scenario is replaced by solar, gas, and biomass in low-carbon scenarios. While all low-carbon strategies, except the renewable energy subsidy scenario, meet Kenya’s nationally determined contribution (NDC) emission reduction targets by 2050, the hybrid scenario emerges as the most effective and cost-efficient pathway. Although achieving significant emissions reductions, the carbon tax and renewable portfolio standard scenarios result in higher system costs. The results indicate that an integrated optimisation-based approach can identify optimal energy development pathways that leverage local resources to accommodate growth and enhance energy access while minimising costs and emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xavier S. Musonye & Brynhildur Davíðsdóttir & Ragnar Kristjánsson & Eyjólfur I. Ásgeirsson & Hlynur Stefánsson, 2025. "Low-Carbon Development Strategies for Power Generation Expansion in Sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from an Optimisation-Based Analysis for Kenya," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1049-:d:1596704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1049/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1049/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blimpo, Moussa P. & Dato, Prudence & Mukhaya, Brian & Odarno, Lily, 2024. "Climate change and economic development in Africa: A systematic review of energy transition modeling research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Liu, Xi & Du, Huibin & Brown, Marilyn A. & Zuo, Jian & Zhang, Ning & Rong, Qian & Mao, Guozhu, 2018. "Low-carbon technology diffusion in the decarbonization of the power sector: Policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 344-356.
    3. Neve Fields & David Ryves & Rudolf Yeganyan & Carla Cannone & Naomi Tan & Mark Howells, 2023. "Evidence-Based Policymaking: Insights and Recommendations for the Implementation of Clean Energy Transition Pathways for Kenya’s Power Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Gugler, Klaus & Haxhimusa, Adhurim & Liebensteiner, Mario, 2021. "Effectiveness of climate policies: Carbon pricing vs. subsidizing renewables," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    5. Dalla Longa, Francesco & van der Zwaan, Bob, 2017. "Do Kenya’s climate change mitigation ambitions necessitate large-scale renewable energy deployment and dedicated low-carbon energy policy?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1559-1568.
    6. Wambui, Valentine & Njoka, Francis & Muguthu, Joseph & Ndwali, Patrick, 2022. "Scenario analysis of electricity pathways in Kenya using Low Emissions Analysis Platform and the Next Energy Modeling system for optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Priesmann, Jan & Nolting, Lars & Praktiknjo, Aaron, 2019. "Are complex energy system models more accurate? An intra-model comparison of power system optimization models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    8. Blazquez, Jorge & Nezamuddin, Nora & Zamrik, Tamim, 2018. "Economic policy instruments and market uncertainty: Exploring the impact on renewables adoption," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 224-233.
    9. Jörg Ankel-Peters & Gunther Bensch & Ashwini Dabadge & Anicet Munyehirwe & Julian Rose & Maximiliane Sievert & Emmanuel Nshakira-Rukundo & Jann Lay, 2025. "Tax carbon cautiously for sub-Saharan Africa," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 7-9, January.
    10. S. Pye & O. Broad & C. Bataille & P. Brockway & H. E. Daly & R. Freeman & A. Gambhir & O. Geden & F. Rogan & S. Sanghvi & J. Tomei & I. Vorushylo & J. Watson, 2021. "Modelling net-zero emissions energy systems requires a change in approach," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 222-231, February.
    11. Mondal, Md Alam Hossain & Bryan, Elizabeth & Ringler, Claudia & Mekonnen, Dawit & Rosegrant, Mark, 2018. "Ethiopian energy status and demand scenarios: Prospects to improve energy efficiency and mitigate GHG emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 161-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fodstad, Marte & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Hellemo, Lars & Knudsen, Brage Rugstad & Pisciella, Paolo & Silvast, Antti & Bordin, Chiara & Schmidt, Sarah & Straus, Julian, 2022. "Next frontiers in energy system modelling: A review on challenges and the state of the art," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Serhan Cevik, 2024. "Climate change and energy security: the dilemma or opportunity of the century?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 26(3), pages 653-672, July.
    3. Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Kittel, Martin & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander & Murmann, Alexander & Launer, Jann & Fehler, Alexander & Gaumnitz, Felix & van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Bußa, 2022. "Modeling flexibility in energy systems — comparison of power sector models based on simplified test cases," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Mujammil Asdhiyoga Rahmanta & Rahmat Adiprasetya Al Hasibi & Handrea Bernando Tambunan & Ruly & Agussalim Syamsuddin & Indra Ardhanayudha Aditya & Benny Susanto, 2024. "Towards a Net Zero-Emission Electricity Generation System by Optimizing Renewable Energy Sources and Nuclear Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Carvalho, Ricardo L. & Lindgren, Robert & García-López, Natxo & Nyambane, Anne & Nyberg, Gert & Diaz-Chavez, Rocio & Boman, Christoffer, 2019. "Household air pollution mitigation with integrated biomass/cookstove strategies in Western Kenya," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 168-186.
    6. Zhang, Jiekuan, 2023. "Emissions trading scheme and energy consumption and output structure: Evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    7. Vincenzo Bianco & Annalisa Marchitto & Federico Scarpa & Luca A. Tagliafico, 2020. "Forecasting Energy Consumption in the EU Residential Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Du, Huibin & Li, Qun & Liu, Xi & Peng, Binbin & Southworth, Frank, 2021. "Costs and potentials of reducing CO2 emissions in China's transport sector: Findings from an energy system analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Barnea, Gil & Hagemann, Christian & Wurster, Stefan, 2022. "Policy instruments matter: Support schemes for renewable energy capacity in worldwide comparison," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Li, Wei & Lu, Can & Zhang, Yan-Wu, 2019. "Prospective exploration of future renewable portfolio standard schemes in China via a multi-sector CGE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 45-56.
    11. Hänsel, Martin C. & Franks, Max & Kalkuhl, Matthias & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2022. "Optimal carbon taxation and horizontal equity: A welfare-theoretic approach with application to German household data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    12. Jabeen, Gul & Ahmad, Munir & Zhang, Qingyu, 2021. "Perceived critical factors affecting consumers’ intention to purchase renewable generation technologies: Rural-urban heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    13. Abrell, Jan & Kosch, Mirjam, 2022. "Cross-country spillovers of renewable energy promotion—The case of Germany," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Wassie, Yibeltal T. & Rannestad, Meley M. & Adaramola, Muyiwa S., 2021. "Determinants of household energy choices in rural sub-Saharan Africa: An example from southern Ethiopia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    15. Dalla Longa, Francesco & van der Zwaan, Bob, 2021. "Heart of light: an assessment of enhanced electricity access in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    16. Nolting, Lars & Praktiknjo, Aaron, 2022. "The complexity dilemma – Insights from security of electricity supply assessments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    17. Hoffmann, Maximilian & Priesmann, Jan & Nolting, Lars & Praktiknjo, Aaron & Kotzur, Leander & Stolten, Detlef, 2021. "Typical periods or typical time steps? A multi-model analysis to determine the optimal temporal aggregation for energy system models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    18. Zhang, Hongyu & Zhang, Da & Zhang, Xiliang, 2023. "The role of output-based emission trading system in the decarbonization of China's power sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Alena Miftakhova & Clément Renoir, 2021. "Economic Growth and Equity in Anticipation of Climate Policy," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 21/355, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    20. van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Kittel, Martin & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander & Murmann, Alexander & Launer, Jann & Torralba-Díaz, Laura & Bußar, Christian, 2022. "Impacts of power sector model features on optimal capacity expansion: A comparative study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1049-:d:1596704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.