IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p654-d1580765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study on the Average CO 2 Emission Factors of Electricity of China

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Chen

    (National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
    Key Laboratory of Metrology Digitalization and Digital Metrology, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 100029, China
    National Metrology Data Center, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Jingyu Lei

    (National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
    Key Laboratory of Metrology Digitalization and Digital Metrology, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 100029, China
    National Metrology Data Center, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Zilong Liu

    (National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
    Key Laboratory of Metrology Digitalization and Digital Metrology, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 100029, China
    National Metrology Data Center, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Xingchuang Xiong

    (National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
    Key Laboratory of Metrology Digitalization and Digital Metrology, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 100029, China
    National Metrology Data Center, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

The intensification of global climate change and the resulting environmental challenges have made carbon emission control a focal point of global attention. As one of the major sources of carbon emissions, the power sector plays a critical role in accurately quantifying CO 2 emissions, which is essential for formulating effective emission reduction policies and action plans. The average CO 2 emission factor of electricity (AEF), as a key parameter, is widely used in calculating indirect carbon emissions from purchased electricity in various industries. The International Energy Agency (IEA) reported an AEF of 0.6093 kgCO 2 /kWh for China in 2021, while the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China (MEE) officially reported a value of 0.5568 kg CO 2 /kWh, resulting in a discrepancy of 9.43%. This study conducts an in-depth analysis of the calculation methodologies used by the MEE and IEA, comparing them from two critical dimensions: calculation formulas and data sources, to explore potential causes of the observed discrepancies. Differences in formula components include factors such as electricity trade, the allocation of emissions from combined heat and power (CHP) plants, and emissions from own energy use in power plants. Notably, the IEA’s inclusion of CHP allocation reduces its calculated emissions by 10.99%. Regarding data sources, this study focuses on total carbon emissions and total electricity generation, revealing that the IEA’s total carbon emissions exceed those of the MEE by 9.71%. This exploratory analysis of the discrepancies in China’s AEFs provides valuable insights and a foundational basis for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Chen & Jingyu Lei & Zilong Liu & Xingchuang Xiong, 2025. "A Comparative Study on the Average CO 2 Emission Factors of Electricity of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:654-:d:1580765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/654/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/654/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Howard, B. & Waite, M. & Modi, V., 2017. "Current and near-term GHG emissions factors from electricity production for New York State and New York City," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 255-271.
    2. Qu, Shen & Wang, Hongxia & Liang, Sai & Shapiro, Avi M. & Suh, Sanwong & Sheldon, Seth & Zik, Ory & Fang, Hong & Xu, Ming, 2017. "A Quasi-Input-Output model to improve the estimation of emission factors for purchased electricity from interconnected grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 249-259.
    3. Ji, Ling & Liang, Sai & Qu, Shen & Zhang, Yanxia & Xu, Ming & Jia, Xiaoping & Jia, Yingtao & Niu, Dongxiao & Yuan, Jiahai & Hou, Yong & Wang, Haikun & Chiu, Anthony S.F. & Hu, Xiaojun, 2016. "Greenhouse gas emission factors of purchased electricity from interconnected grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 751-758.
    4. Wang, Chen & Raza, Syed Ali & Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday & Yi, Sun & Shah, Muhammad Ibrahim, 2023. "The roles of hydro, nuclear and biomass energy towards carbon neutrality target in China: A policy-based analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    5. Jia, Min & Zhang, Zhe & Zhang, Li & Zhao, Liang & Lu, Xinbo & Li, Linyan & Ruan, Jianhui & Wu, Yunlong & He, Zhuoming & Liu, Mei & Jiang, Lingling & Gao, Yajing & Wu, Pengcheng & Zhu, Shuying & Niu, M, 2024. "Optimization of electricity generation and assessment of provincial grid emission factors from 2020 to 2060 in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ekaterina Shirinkina & Yuliya Mozzhegorova & Galina Ilinykh & Vladimir Korotaev, 2024. "Carbon Footprint of Electricity Produced in the Russian Federation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Ling, Chen & Yang, Qing & Wang, Qingrui & Bartocci, Pietro & Jiang, Lei & Xu, Zishuo & Wang, Luyao, 2024. "A comprehensive consumption-based carbon accounting framework for power system towards low-carbon transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    3. Zhang, Haoran & Li, Ruixiong & Cai, Xingrui & Zheng, Chaoyue & Liu, Laibao & Liu, Maodian & Zhang, Qianru & Lin, Huiming & Chen, Long & Wang, Xuejun, 2022. "Do electricity flows hamper regional economic–environmental equity?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    4. Yanfeng Li & Yongping Li & Guohe Huang & Rubing Zheng, 2022. "Inter-Provincial Electricity Trading and Its Effects on Carbon Emissions from the Power Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Zhang, Pengfei & Cai, Wenqiu & Yao, Mingtao & Wang, Zhiyou & Yang, Luzhen & Wei, Wendong, 2020. "Urban carbon emissions associated with electricity consumption in Beijing and the driving factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    6. Zhou, Zhanhang & Zeng, Chen & Li, Keke & Yang, Yuemin & Zhao, Kuokuo & Wang, Zhen, 2024. "Decomposition of the decoupling between electricity CO2 emissions and economic growth: A production and consumption perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    7. Zhang, Tianhao & Dong, Zhe & Huang, Xiaojin, 2024. "Multi-objective optimization of thermal power and outlet steam temperature for a nuclear steam supply system with deep reinforcement learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    8. Kamanda Espoir, Delphin, 2024. "Investigating the dynamic impacts of public debt on economic growth in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a case of quantile on quantile regression," MPRA Paper 122415, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Alola, Andrew Adewale & Özkan, Oktay & Usman, Ojonugwa, 2023. "Examining crude oil price outlook amidst substitute energy price and household energy expenditure in the USA: A novel nonparametric multivariate QQR approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Huang, Anzhong & Dai, Luote & Ali, Sajid & Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday, 2024. "From funds to footprints: Unravelling the asymmetric association between nuclear energy technology and environmental quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    11. Hengjing He & Shangli Zhou & Leping Zhang & Wei Zhao & Xia Xiao, 2023. "Dynamic Accounting Model and Method for Carbon Emissions on the Power Grid Side," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-10, June.
    12. Zhou, Xi-Yin & Xu, Zhicheng & Zheng, Jialin & Zhou, Ya & Lei, Kun & Fu, Jiafeng & Khu, Soon-Thiam & Yang, Junfeng, 2023. "Internal spillover effect of carbon emission between transportation sectors and electricity generation sectors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 356-366.
    13. Saqib, Najia & Shahzad, U., 2024. "Pathways to sustainability: Evaluating the impact of green energy, natural resources, FinTech, and environmental policies in resource-abundant countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    14. Zhang, Jinbo & Liu, Lirong & Xie, Yulei & Han, Dengcheng & Zhang, Yang & Li, Zheng & Guo, Huaicheng, 2023. "Revealing the impact of an energy–water–carbon nexus–based joint tax management policy on the environ-economic system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    15. Haoran Zhang & Limin Jiao & Cai Li & Zhongci Deng & Zhen Wang & Qiqi Jia & Xihong Lian & Yaolin Liu & Yuanchao Hu, 2024. "Global environmental impacts of food system from regional shock: Russia-Ukraine war as an example," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Wang, Junfeng & He, Shutong & Qiu, Ye & Liu, Nan & Li, Yongjian & Dong, Zhanfeng, 2018. "Investigating driving forces of aggregate carbon intensity of electricity generation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 249-257.
    17. Wenbo Li & Ruyin Long & Linling Zhang & Zhengxia He & Feiyu Chen & Hong Chen, 2020. "Greenhouse Gas Emission Transfer of Inter-Provincial Electricity Trade in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    18. Wang, Xiaoyi & Chen, Guanqun & Afshan, Sahar & Awosusi, Abraham Ayobamiji & Abbas, Shujaat, 2023. "Transition towards sustainable energy: The role of economic complexity, financial liberalization and natural resources management in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    19. Wang, Yulin & Han, Mo & Liu, Kai, 2024. "Towards sustainable path: Measuring the effectiveness of natural resource utilization, renewable energy resources, fintech, environmental investments, and research & development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    20. Loprete, Jason & Trojanowski, Rebecca & Butcher, Thomas & Longtin, Jon & Assanis, Dimitris, 2024. "Enabling residential heating decarbonization through hydronic low-temperature thermal distribution using forced-air assistive devices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:654-:d:1580765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.