IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p654-d1580765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study on the Average CO 2 Emission Factors of Electricity of China

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Chen

    (National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
    Key Laboratory of Metrology Digitalization and Digital Metrology, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 100029, China
    National Metrology Data Center, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Jingyu Lei

    (National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
    Key Laboratory of Metrology Digitalization and Digital Metrology, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 100029, China
    National Metrology Data Center, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Zilong Liu

    (National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
    Key Laboratory of Metrology Digitalization and Digital Metrology, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 100029, China
    National Metrology Data Center, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Xingchuang Xiong

    (National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China
    Key Laboratory of Metrology Digitalization and Digital Metrology, State Administration for Market Regulation, Beijing 100029, China
    National Metrology Data Center, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

The intensification of global climate change and the resulting environmental challenges have made carbon emission control a focal point of global attention. As one of the major sources of carbon emissions, the power sector plays a critical role in accurately quantifying CO 2 emissions, which is essential for formulating effective emission reduction policies and action plans. The average CO 2 emission factor of electricity (AEF), as a key parameter, is widely used in calculating indirect carbon emissions from purchased electricity in various industries. The International Energy Agency (IEA) reported an AEF of 0.6093 kgCO 2 /kWh for China in 2021, while the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China (MEE) officially reported a value of 0.5568 kg CO 2 /kWh, resulting in a discrepancy of 9.43%. This study conducts an in-depth analysis of the calculation methodologies used by the MEE and IEA, comparing them from two critical dimensions: calculation formulas and data sources, to explore potential causes of the observed discrepancies. Differences in formula components include factors such as electricity trade, the allocation of emissions from combined heat and power (CHP) plants, and emissions from own energy use in power plants. Notably, the IEA’s inclusion of CHP allocation reduces its calculated emissions by 10.99%. Regarding data sources, this study focuses on total carbon emissions and total electricity generation, revealing that the IEA’s total carbon emissions exceed those of the MEE by 9.71%. This exploratory analysis of the discrepancies in China’s AEFs provides valuable insights and a foundational basis for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Chen & Jingyu Lei & Zilong Liu & Xingchuang Xiong, 2025. "A Comparative Study on the Average CO 2 Emission Factors of Electricity of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:654-:d:1580765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/654/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/654/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:654-:d:1580765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.