Thermal Insulation of Agricultural Buildings Using Different Biomass Materials

The main goal of the article is to present the effectiveness of biomass as a thermal insulator and estimate the global potential for using biomass, considering the perspective of sustainable development and improving energy efficiency in agricultural building construction. The article presents two types of piggery construction: one using typical materials like concrete and the other using biomass-based materials. The evaluation is based on carbon footprint and embodied energy indicators. The model calculations developed in this article may be used in the future for life cycle assessment (LCA) analyses of specific construction solutions for rural livestock buildings. Two model variants for constructing a pigsty with different insulating materials were compared. The TB (Traditional Building) variant consisted of layers of (AAC) Autoclaved Aerated Concrete, glass wool, and brick. The second model variant, HB (Hempcrete Building), was made of concrete blocks with the addition of industrial hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) shives. Regarding footprint evaluation, bio-based materials often have a net-negative carbon footprint due to the sequestration effect. The results showed a significant difference in the carbon footprint of both TB and HB solutions—the carbon footprint of the HB variant was only 9.02% of that of the TB variant. The insulation properties of hempcrete were also compared to those of the most frequently used insulating materials in construction, such as glass wool and rock wool. The novelty of the study lies in analyzing the potential use of biomass for thermal insulation in livestock buildings, considering various raw materials, including their industrial properties and the ecological benefits resulting from their implementation. In addition, the authors focused on biomass thermal insulation from the perspective of sustainable development and improving energy efficiency in building construction. Our evaluation and selection of the best solutions are based on the indicators of embodied energy and carbon footprint.