IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v258y2020ics0306261919317945.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation

Author

Listed:
  • Röck, Martin
  • Saade, Marcella Ruschi Mendes
  • Balouktsi, Maria
  • Rasmussen, Freja Nygaard
  • Birgisdottir, Harpa
  • Frischknecht, Rolf
  • Habert, Guillaume
  • Lützkendorf, Thomas
  • Passer, Alexander

Abstract

Buildings are major sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and contributors to the climate crisis. To meet climate-change mitigation needs, one must go beyond operational energy consumption and related GHG emissions of buildings and address their full life cycle. This study investigates the global trends of GHG emissions arising across the life cycle of buildings by systematically compiling and analysing more than 650 life cycle assessment (LCA) case studies. The results, presented for different energy performance classes based on a final sample of 238 cases, show a clear reduction trend in life cycle GHG emissions due to improved operational energy performance. However, the analysis reveals an increase in relative and absolute contributions of so‐called ‘embodied’ GHG emissions, i.e., emissions arising from manufacturing and processing of building materials. While the average share of embodied GHG emissions from buildings following current energy performance regulations is approximately 20–25% of life cycle GHG emissions, this figure escalates to 45–50% for highly energy-efficient buildings and surpasses 90% in extreme cases. Furthermore, this study analyses GHG emissions at time of occurrence, highlighting the ‘carbon spike’ from building production. Relating the results to existing benchmarks for buildings’ GHG emissions in the Swiss SIA energy efficiency path shows that most cases exceed the target of 11.0 kgCO2eq/m2a. Considering global GHG reduction targets, these results emphasize the urgent need to reduce GHG emissions of buildings by optimizing both operational and embodied impacts. The analysis further confirmed a need for improving transparency and comparability of LCA studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Röck, Martin & Saade, Marcella Ruschi Mendes & Balouktsi, Maria & Rasmussen, Freja Nygaard & Birgisdottir, Harpa & Frischknecht, Rolf & Habert, Guillaume & Lützkendorf, Thomas & Passer, Alexander, 2020. "Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:258:y:2020:i:c:s0306261919317945
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919317945
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dixit, Manish K., 2017. "Life cycle embodied energy analysis of residential buildings: A review of literature to investigate embodied energy parameters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 390-413.
    2. Longhi, Simonetta, 2015. "Residential energy expenditures and the relevance of changes in household circumstances," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 440-450.
    3. Quiggin, Daniel & Buswell, Richard, 2016. "The implications of heat electrification on national electrical supply-demand balance under published 2050 energy scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 253-270.
    4. Buyle, Matthias & Braet, Johan & Audenaert, Amaryllis, 2013. "Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 379-388.
    5. Filippini, Massimo & Pachauri, Shonali, 2004. "Elasticities of electricity demand in urban Indian households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 429-436, February.
    6. Rauf, Abdul & Crawford, Robert H., 2015. "Building service life and its effect on the life cycle embodied energy of buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 140-148.
    7. Besagni, Giorgio & Borgarello, Marco, 2018. "The determinants of residential energy expenditure in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 369-386.
    8. Trevor S.K. Ng & Raymond M.H. Yau & Tony N.T. Lam & Vincent S.Y. Cheng, 2016. "Design and commission a zero-carbon building for hot and humid climate," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 222-234.
    9. Brounen, Dirk & Kok, Nils & Quigley, John M., 2012. "Residential energy use and conservation: Economics and demographics," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 931-945.
    10. Anand, Chirjiv Kaur & Amor, Ben, 2017. "Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 408-416.
    11. Eyre, Nick & Baruah, Pranab, 2015. "Uncertainties in future energy demand in UK residential heating," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 641-653.
    12. Gartner, E. M. & Smith, M. A., 1976. "Energy costs of house construction," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 144-157, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taneja, Shivani & Mandys, Filip, 2022. "Drivers of UK household energy expenditure: Promoting efficiency and curbing emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Varghese, Sushant & Sioshansi, Ramteen, 2020. "The price is right? How pricing and incentive mechanisms in California incentivize building distributed hybrid solar and energy-storage systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Zhou, Yuekuan & Zheng, Siqian, 2020. "Machine-learning based hybrid demand-side controller for high-rise office buildings with high energy flexibilities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    4. Javier Bueno & Desiderio Romero-Jordán & Pablo del Río, 2020. "Analysing the Drivers of Electricity Demand in Spain after the Economic Crisis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Grdenić, Goran & Delimar, Marko & Robić, Slavica, 2020. "Framing the context of energy poverty in Croatia: A case-study from Zagreb," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    6. Salari, Mahmoud & Javid, Roxana J., 2016. "Residential energy demand in the United States: Analysis using static and dynamic approaches," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 637-649.
    7. Olsen, Karen Pardos & Zong, Yi & You, Shi & Bindner, Henrik & Koivisto, Matti & Gea-Bermúdez, Juan, 2020. "Multi-timescale data-driven method identifying flexibility requirements for scenarios with high penetration of renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    8. De Schepper, Guillaume & Paulus, Claire & Bolly, Pierre-Yves & Hermans, Thomas & Lesparre, Nolwenn & Robert, Tanguy, 2019. "Assessment of short-term aquifer thermal energy storage for demand-side management perspectives: Experimental and numerical developments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 534-546.
    9. Yarbaşı, İkram Yusuf & Çelik, Ali Kemal, 2023. "The determinants of household electricity demand in Turkey: An implementation of the Heckman Sample Selection model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    10. Ortiz, J. & Casquero-Modrego, N. & Salom, J., 2019. "Health and related economic effects of residential energy retrofitting in Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 375-388.
    11. Besagni, Giorgio & Borgarello, Marco, 2018. "The determinants of residential energy expenditure in Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 369-386.
    12. Vassilis M. Charitopoulos & Mathilde Fajardy & Chi Kong Chyong & David M. Reiner, 2022. "The case of 100% electrification of domestic heat in Great Britain," Working Papers EPRG2206, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    13. Hendrik Schmitz & Reinhard Madlener, 2020. "Heterogeneity in price responsiveness for residential space heating in Germany," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 2255-2281, November.
    14. Loi, Tian Sheng Allan & Loo, Soh Leng, 2016. "The impact of Singapore’s residential electricity conservation efforts and the way forward. Insights from the bounds testing approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 735-743.
    15. Kettani, Maryème & Sanin, Maria Eugenia, 2024. "Energy consumption and energy poverty in Morocco," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    16. Mastrucci, Alessio & Marvuglia, Antonino & Leopold, Ulrich & Benetto, Enrico, 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment of building stocks from urban to transnational scales: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 316-332.
    17. Chen, Guangwu & Zhu, Yuhan & Wiedmann, Thomas & Yao, Lina & Xu, Lixiao & Wang, Yafei, 2019. "Urban-rural disparities of household energy requirements and influence factors in China: Classification tree models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1321-1335.
    18. Mastrucci, Alessio & Marvuglia, Antonino & Benetto, Enrico & Leopold, Ulrich, 2020. "A spatio-temporal life cycle assessment framework for building renovation scenarios at the urban scale," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    19. Selima Sultana & Nastaran Pourebrahim & Hyojin Kim, 2018. "Household Energy Expenditures in North Carolina: A Geographically Weighted Regression Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    20. McCallum, Peter & Jenkins, David P. & Peacock, Andrew D. & Patidar, Sandhya & Andoni, Merlinda & Flynn, David & Robu, Valentin, 2019. "A multi-sectoral approach to modelling community energy demand of the built environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 865-875.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:258:y:2020:i:c:s0306261919317945. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.