IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i7p1786-d1372077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of Biogas Production Volumes from Household Organic Waste Based on Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Inna Tryhuba

    (Department of Information Technologies, Lviv National Environmental University, 80-381 Dublyany, Ukraine)

  • Anatoliy Tryhuba

    (Department of Information Technologies, Lviv National Environmental University, 80-381 Dublyany, Ukraine
    Ukrainian University in Europe—Foundation, Balicka 116, 30-149 Krakow, Poland)

  • Taras Hutsol

    (Department of Mechanics and Agroecosystems Engineering, Polissia National University, 10-008 Zhytomyr, Ukraine)

  • Agata Cieszewska

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Oleh Andrushkiv

    (Department of Information Technologies, Lviv State University of Life Safety, 79-007 Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Szymon Glowacki

    (Department of Fundamentals of Engineering and Power Engineering, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Andrzej Bryś

    (Department of Fundamentals of Engineering and Power Engineering, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Sergii Slobodian

    (Department of Information Technology, Physical, Mathematical and Civil Defence Disciplines, Faculty of Energy and Information Technologies, Higher Educational Institution “Podillia State University”, 32-300 Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine)

  • Weronika Tulej

    (Department of Fundamentals of Engineering and Power Engineering, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Mariusz Sojak

    (Department of Fundamentals of Engineering and Power Engineering, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The article proposes to use machine learning as one of the areas of artificial intelligence to forecast the volume of biogas production from household organic waste. The use of five regression algorithms (Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Random Forest Regression, and Gradient Boosting Regression) to create an effective model for forecasting the volume of biogas production from household organic waste is considered. Based on the comparison of these algorithms by MSE and MAE indicators, the quality of training and their accuracy during forecasting are evaluated. The proposed algorithm for creating a model for forecasting biogas production volumes from household organic waste involves the implementation of 10 main and 3 auxiliary steps. Their advantage is that they aid in the performance of component data analysis, which is carried out based on the method of reducing the dimensionality of the data set, increasing interpretability, and minimizing the risk of data loss. An analysis of 2433 data is was carried out, which characterizes the formation of biogas from food (FW) and yard waste (YW) according to four features. Data preparation is performed using the Jupyter Notebook environment in Python. We select five machine learning algorithms to substantiate an effective model for forecasting volumes of biogas production from household organic waste. On the basis of the conducted research, the main advantages and disadvantages of the used algorithms for building forecasting models of biogas production volumes from household organic waste are determined. It is found that two models, “Random Forest Regressor” and “Gradient Boosting Regressor”, show the best accuracy indicators. The other three models (Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression) are inferior in accuracy and were not considered further. To determine the accuracy of the “Random Forest Regressor” and “Gradient Boosting Regressor” models, we choose the MSE and MAE indicators. The Random Forest Regressor model is found to be a more accurate model compared to the Gradient Boosting Regressor. This is confirmed by the fact that the MSE of the “Random Forest Regressor” model on the training data set is 7.14 times smaller than that of the “Gradient Boosting Regressor” model. At the same time, MAE is 2.67 times smaller in the “Random Forest Regressor” model than in the “Gradient Boosting Regressor” model. The MSE and MAE of both models are worse on the test data set, which indicates overtraining tendencies. The Gradient Boosting Regressor model has worse MSE and MAE than the Random Forest Regressor model on both the training and test data sets. It is established that the model based on the “Random Forest Regressor” algorithm is the most effective for forecasting the volume of biogas production from household organic waste. It provides MAE = 0.088 on test data and the smallest absolute errors in predictions. Further systematic improvement of the “Random Forest Regressor” model for forecasting biogas production volumes from household organic waste based on new data will ensure its accuracy and maintain competitive advantages.

Suggested Citation

  • Inna Tryhuba & Anatoliy Tryhuba & Taras Hutsol & Agata Cieszewska & Oleh Andrushkiv & Szymon Glowacki & Andrzej Bryś & Sergii Slobodian & Weronika Tulej & Mariusz Sojak, 2024. "Prediction of Biogas Production Volumes from Household Organic Waste Based on Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1786-:d:1372077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1786/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1786/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Radoslaw Slezak & Hilal Unyay & Szymon Szufa & Stanislaw Ledakowicz, 2023. "An Extensive Review and Comparison of Modern Biomass Reactors Torrefaction vs. Biomass Pyrolizers—Part 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Anatoliy Tryhuba & Roman Ratushny & Inna Tryhuba & Nazar Koval & Igor Androshchuk, 2020. "The Model of Projects Creation of the Fire Extinguishing Systems in Community Territories," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 68(2), pages 419-431.
    3. Anatoliy Tryhuba & Vitalij Boyarchuk & Inna Tryhuba & Oleh Boyarchuk & Oksana Ftoma, 2019. "Evaluation of Risk Value of Investors of Projects for the Creation of Crop Protection of Family Dairy Farms," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(5), pages 1357-1367.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Inna Tryhuba & Anatoliy Tryhuba & Taras Hutsol & Szymon Szufa & Szymon Glowacki & Oleh Andrushkiv & Roman Padyuka & Oleksandr Faichuk & Nataliia Slavina, 2024. "European Green Deal: Substantiation of the Rational Configuration of the Bioenergy Production System from Organic Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Anatoliy Tryhuba & Taras Hutsol & Maciej Kuboń & Inna Tryhuba & Serhii Komarnitskyi & Sylwester Tabor & Dariusz Kwaśniewski & Krzysztof Mudryk & Oleksandr Faichuk & Tetyana Hohol & Wioletta Tomaszewsk, 2022. "Taxonomy and Stakeholder Risk Management in Integrated Projects of the European Green Deal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Kossińska, Nina & Krzyżyńska, Renata & Ghazal, Heba & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Hydrothermal carbonisation of sewage sludge and resulting biofuels as a sustainable energy source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    4. Lukáš Krátký & Stanislaw Ledakowicz & Radoslaw Slezak & Vojtěch Bělohlav & Peter Peciar & Máté Petrik & Tomáš Jirout & Marián Peciar & Zoltán Siménfalvi & Radek Šulc & Zoltán Szamosi, 2024. "Emerging Sustainability in Carbon Capture and Use Strategies for V4 Countries via Biochemical Pathways: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Anatoliy Tryhuba & Taras Hutsol & Inna Tryhuba & Krzysztof Mudryk & Valentyna Kukharets & Szymon Głowacki & Larysa Dibrova & Oleksandr Kozak & Krystyna Pavlenko-Didur, 2022. "Assessment of the Condition of the Project Environment for the Implementation of Technologically Integrated Projects of the “European Green Deal” Using Maize Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Zhigui Guan & Yuanjun Zhao & Guojing Geng, 2022. "The Risk Early-Warning Model of Financial Operation in Family Farms Based on Back Propagation Neural Network Methods," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 1221-1244, December.
    7. Hilal Unyay & Piotr Piersa & Magdalena Zabochnicka & Zdzisława Romanowska-Duda & Piotr Kuryło & Ksawery Kuligowski & Paweł Kazimierski & Taras Hutsol & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Edyta Wrzesińska-Jędrusiak &, 2023. "Torrefaction of Willow in Batch Reactor and Co-Firing of Torrefied Willow with Coal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    8. Stanisław Ledakowicz & Olexa Piddubniak, 2023. "Temperature Distribution in a Finite-Length Cylindrical Channel Filled with Biomass Transported by Electrically Heated Auger," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Esin Apaydın Varol & Ülker Mutlu, 2023. "TGA-FTIR Analysis of Biomass Samples Based on the Thermal Decomposition Behavior of Hemicellulose, Cellulose, and Lignin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1786-:d:1372077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.