IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i24p6256-d1541724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Capacity of Power of Biogas Plants and Their Technical Efficiency: A Case Study of Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Dariusz Kusz

    (The Faculty of Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, Al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Tomasz Nowakowski

    (The Faculty of Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, Al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Bożena Kusz

    (The Faculty of Management, Rzeszow University of Technology, Al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland)

Abstract

The size of a company is a fundamental factor that can influence its efficiency. In larger companies, economies of scale are a key consideration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the technical efficiency of agricultural biogas plants differentiated according to their capacity of power. The study included 43 agricultural biogas plants, which were divided into three groups according to their capacity power: group I, <0.5 MW; group II, 0.5–1 MW; group III, ≥1 MW. In order to assess the technical efficiency of agricultural biogas plants under the research, the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method was applied. It was found that the largest biogas plants were the most efficient. However, the technical efficiency of the smallest biogas plants was not statistically significantly different from that of the largest biogas plants. This indicates that small entities can achieve the technical efficiency at a satisfactory level. For this reason, in the development policy of agricultural biogas plants, the optimal solution is the coexistence of large and small facilities. The smallest biogas plants were more sensitive to changes in the macroeconomic environment than other biogas plants. This may suggest a need to pay more attention to energy policy mechanisms to stabilize their performance in periods of disadvantageous macroeconomic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dariusz Kusz & Tomasz Nowakowski & Bożena Kusz, 2024. "The Capacity of Power of Biogas Plants and Their Technical Efficiency: A Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:24:p:6256-:d:1541724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6256/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/24/6256/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dariusz Kusz & Bożena Kusz & Ludwik Wicki & Tomasz Nowakowski & Ryszard Kata & Władysław Brejta & Anna Kasprzyk & Marek Barć, 2024. "The Economic Efficiencies of Investment in Biogas Plants—A Case Study of a Biogas Plant Using Waste from a Dairy Farm in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Stefaniia Belinska & Peter Bielik & Izabela Adamičková & Patrícia Husárová & Svitlana Onyshko & Yanina Belinska, 2024. "Assessment of Environmental and Economic-Financial Feasibility of Biogas Plants for Agricultural Waste Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Piotr Gradziuk & Krzysztof Jończyk & Barbara Gradziuk & Adrianna Wojciechowska & Anna Trocewicz & Marcin Wysokiński, 2021. "An Economic Assessment of the Impact on Agriculture of the Proposed Changes in EU Biofuel Policy Mechanisms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Tomasz Smal & Joanna Wieprow, 2023. "Energy Security in the Context of Global Energy Crisis: Economic and Financial Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-12, February.
    5. Raven, R.P.J.M. & Gregersen, K.H., 2007. "Biogas plants in Denmark: successes and setbacks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 116-132, January.
    6. Monteiro, Eliseu & Mantha, Vishveshwar & Rouboa, Abel, 2011. "Prospective application of farm cattle manure for bioenergy production in Portugal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 627-631.
    7. Marek Cierpiał-Wolan & Jolanta Stec-Rusiecka & Dariusz Twaróg & Katarzyna Bilińska & Anna Dewalska-Opitek & Bogdan Wierzbiński, 2022. "Relationship between Renewable Biogas Energy Sources and Financial Health of Food Business Operators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    9. Mæng, H. & Lund, H. & Hvelplund, F., 1999. "Biogas plants in Denmark: technological and economic developments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-4), pages 195-206, September.
    10. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Yuan, Yan & Goto, Mika, 2017. "A literature study for DEA applied to energy and environment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 104-124.
    11. D’Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Huisingh, Donald & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2021. "A circular economy model based on biomethane: What are the opportunities for the municipality of Rome and beyond?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1660-1672.
    12. Andreas Eder & Bernhard Mahlberg & Bernhard Stürmer, 2021. "Measuring and explaining productivity growth of renewable energy producers: An empirical study of Austrian biogas plants," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 48(1), pages 37-63, February.
    13. Fare, Rolf & Shawna Grosskopf & Mary Norris & Zhongyang Zhang, 1994. "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(1), pages 66-83, March.
    14. Silberston, Aubrey, 1972. "Economies of Scale in Theory and Practice," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(325), pages 369-391, Supplemen.
    15. Zhao, Xingang & Liu, Pingkuo, 2014. "Focus on bioenergy industry development and energy security in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 302-312.
    16. Aleksandra Lubańska & Jan K. Kazak, 2023. "The Role of Biogas Production in Circular Economy Approach from the Perspective of Locality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Dawid Szutowski, 2024. "The impact of sectoral and macroeconomic variables on company profitability in the energy sector. Analysis using neural networks," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 55(3), pages 357-380.
    18. Jakub Mazurkiewicz, 2023. "The Impact of Manure Use for Energy Purposes on the Economic Balance of a Dairy Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Peter Vindiš & Karmen Pažek & Jernej Prišenk & Črtomir Rozman, 2024. "The Economic Efficiency of Micro Biogas Plants: A Sustainable Energy Solution in Slovenia—Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Hasan Ertop & Atilgan Atilgan & Joanna Kocięcka & Anna Krakowiak-Bal & Daniel Liberacki & Burak Saltuk & Roman Rolbiecki, 2023. "Calculation of the Potential Biogas and Electricity Values of Animal Wastes: Turkey and Poland Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-19, November.
    21. Bohl, Martin T. & Kaufmann, Philipp & Stephan, Patrick M., 2013. "From hero to zero: Evidence of performance reversal and speculative bubbles in German renewable energy stocks," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 40-51.
    22. Rácz, Viktor J. & Vestergaard, Niels, 2016. "Productivity and efficiency measurement of the Danish centralized biogas power sector," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 397-404.
    23. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Golany, B. & Seiford, L. & Stutz, J., 1985. "Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1-2), pages 91-107.
    24. O’Shea, Richard & Wall, David & Kilgallon, Ian & Murphy, Jerry D., 2016. "Assessment of the impact of incentives and of scale on the build order and location of biomethane facilities and the feedstock they utilise," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 394-408.
    25. Mattia Iotti & Elisa Manghi & Giuseppe Bonazzi, 2024. "Debt Sustainability Assessment in the Biogas Sector: Application of Interest Coverage Ratios in a Sample of Agricultural Firms in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-34, March.
    26. Feng, Yanchao & Shoaib, Muhammad & Akram, Rabia & Alnafrah, Ibrahim & Ai, Fengyi & Irfan, Muhammad, 2024. "Assessing and prioritizing biogas energy barriers: A sustainable roadmap for energy security," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    27. Madlener, Reinhard & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Dias, Luis C., 2009. "Assessing the performance of biogas plants with multi-criteria and data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(3), pages 1084-1094, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dariusz Kusz & Bożena Kusz & Ludwik Wicki & Tomasz Nowakowski & Ryszard Kata & Władysław Brejta & Anna Kasprzyk & Marek Barć, 2024. "The Economic Efficiencies of Investment in Biogas Plants—A Case Study of a Biogas Plant Using Waste from a Dairy Farm in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, July.
    2. De Clercq, Djavan & Wen, Zongguo & Caicedo, Luis & Cao, Xin & Fan, Fei & Xu, Ruifei, 2017. "Application of DEA and statistical inference to model the determinants of biomethane production efficiency: A case study in south China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1231-1243.
    3. Andreas Eder & Bernhard Mahlberg & Bernhard Stürmer, 2021. "Measuring and explaining productivity growth of renewable energy producers: An empirical study of Austrian biogas plants," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 48(1), pages 37-63, February.
    4. Rácz, Viktor J. & Vestergaard, Niels, 2016. "Productivity and efficiency measurement of the Danish centralized biogas power sector," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 397-404.
    5. Papież, Monika & Śmiech, Sławomir & Frodyma, Katarzyna, 2019. "Factors affecting the efficiency of wind power in the European Union countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 965-977.
    6. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Aliasghar Arabmaldar & John Otu Asu, 2022. "Robust productivity growth and efficiency measurement with undesirable outputs: evidence from the oil industry," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(4), pages 1213-1254, December.
    7. Fu, Xiaolan, 2012. "How does openness affect the importance of incentives for innovation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 512-523.
    8. Forsund, Finn R. & Sarafoglou, Nikias, 2005. "The tale of two research communities: The diffusion of research on productive efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 17-40, October.
    9. Nocera Alves Junior, Paulo & Costa Melo, Isotilia & de Moraes Santos, Rodrigo & da Rocha, Fernando Vinícius & Caixeta-Filho, José Vicente, 2022. "How did COVID-19 affect green-fuel supply chain? - A performance analysis of Brazilian ethanol sector," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Raab, Raymond L. & Feroz, Ehsan Habib, 2007. "A productivity growth accounting approach to the ranking of developing and developed nations," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 396-415, December.
    11. Suberu, Mohammed Yekini & Bashir, Nouruddeen & Mustafa, Mohd. Wazir, 2013. "Biogenic waste methane emissions and methane optimization for bioelectricity in Nigeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 643-654.
    12. Laura Calzada-Infante & Ana María López-Narbona & Alberto Núñez-Elvira & Javier Orozco-Messana, 2020. "Assessing the Efficiency of Sustainable Cities Using an Empirical Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, March.
    13. Sala-Garrido, Ramon & Mocholi-Arce, Manuel & Maziotis, Alexandros & Molinos-Senante, María, 2023. "The carbon and production performance of water utilities: Evidence from the English and Welsh water industry," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 292-300.
    14. Demiral, Elif E. & Sağlam, Ümit, 2021. "Eco-efficiency and Eco-productivity assessments of the states in the United States: A two-stage Non-parametric analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    15. Mohammad Nourani & Qian Long Kweh & Irene Wei Kiong Ting & Wen-Min Lu & Anna Strutt, 2022. "Evaluating traditional, dynamic and network business models: an efficiency-based study of Chinese insurance companies," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(4), pages 905-943, October.
    16. Ramón Sala-Garrido & Manuel Mocholí-Arce & María Molinos-Senante & Alexandros Maziotis, 2021. "Comparing Operational, Environmental and Eco-Efficiency of Water Companies in England and Wales," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    17. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Sekitani, Kazuyuki, 2009. "An occurrence of multiple projections in DEA-based measurement of technical efficiency: Theoretical comparison among DEA models from desirable properties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 764-794, July.
    18. Sinuany-Stern, Zilla, 2023. "Foundations of operations research: From linear programming to data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1069-1080.
    19. Huang, Hongyun & Mo, Renbian & Chen, Xingquan, 2021. "New patterns in China's regional green development: An interval Malmquist–Luenberger productivity analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 161-173.
    20. Yuan, Qianqian & Fang Chin Cheng, Charles & Wang, Jiayu & Zhu, Tian-Tian & Wang, Ke, 2020. "Inclusive and sustainable industrial development in China: An efficiency-based analysis for current status and improving potentials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:24:p:6256-:d:1541724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.