IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i23p5824-d1526148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corrosion Rate Prediction of Buried Oil and Gas Pipelines: A New Deep Learning Method Based on RF and IBWO-Optimized BiLSTM–GRU Combined Model

Author

Listed:
  • Jiong Wang

    (Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum (Group) Co., Ltd. Pipeline Transportation Company, Xi’an 710075, China)

  • Zhi Kong

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Jinrong Shan

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Chuanjia Du

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Chengjun Wang

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

Abstract

The corrosion of oil and gas pipelines represents a significant factor influencing the safety of these pipelines. The extant research on intelligent algorithms for assessing corrosion rates in pipelines has primarily focused on static evaluation methods, which are inadequate for providing a comprehensive dynamic evaluation of the complex phenomenon of corrosion in buried oil and gas pipelines. This paper proposes a novel approach to predicting the corrosion rate of buried oil and gas pipelines. The method is based on the combination of an improved Beluga Optimization algorithm (IBWO) and Random Forest (RF) optimization with BiLSTM and gated cycle unit (GRU), which are used to classify corrosion rates as high or low. Initially, a feature screening of corrosion factors was conducted via RF, whereby variables exhibiting a strong correlation were extracted. Subsequently, IBWO was employed to optimize the feature selection process, with the objective of identifying the optimal feature subset to enhance the model’s performance. Ultimately, the BiLSTM method was employed for the purpose of predicting the occurrence of low corrosion. A GRU method was employed for prediction in the context of high corrosion conditions. The RF–IBWO-BiLSTM–GRU model constructed in this paper demonstrates high prediction accuracy for both high and low corrosion rates. The verification of 100 groups of experimental data yielded the following results: the mean square error of this model is 0.0498 and the R 2 is 0.9876, which is significantly superior to that of other prediction models. The combined model, which incorporates an intelligent algorithm, is an effective means of enhancing the precision of buried pipeline corrosion rate prediction. Furthermore, it offers a novel approach and insight that can inform subsequent research on the prediction of corrosion rates in buried oil and gas pipelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiong Wang & Zhi Kong & Jinrong Shan & Chuanjia Du & Chengjun Wang, 2024. "Corrosion Rate Prediction of Buried Oil and Gas Pipelines: A New Deep Learning Method Based on RF and IBWO-Optimized BiLSTM–GRU Combined Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:5824-:d:1526148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/5824/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/5824/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heidary, Roohollah & Groth, Katrina M., 2021. "A hybrid population-based degradation model for pipeline pitting corrosion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yin, Yuanbo & Yang, Hao & Duan, Pengfei & Li, Luling & Zio, Enrico & Liu, Cuiwei & Li, Yuxing, 2022. "Improved quantitative risk assessment of a natural gas pipeline considering high-consequence areas," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    2. Amaya-Gómez, Rafael & Schoefs, Franck & Sánchez-Silva, Mauricio & Muñoz, Felipe & Bastidas-Arteaga, Emilio, 2022. "Matching of corroded defects in onshore pipelines based on In-Line Inspections and Voronoi partitions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Salem, Marwa Belhaj & Fouladirad, Mitra & Deloux, Estelle, 2022. "Variance Gamma process as degradation model for prognosis and imperfect maintenance of centrifugal pumps," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Bansal, Parth & Zheng, Zhuoyuan & Shao, Chenhui & Li, Jingjing & Banu, Mihaela & Carlson, Blair E & Li, Yumeng, 2022. "Physics-informed machine learning assisted uncertainty quantification for the corrosion of dissimilar material joints," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    5. Miao, Xingyuan & Zhao, Hong, 2024. "Corroded submarine pipeline degradation prediction based on theory-guided IMOSOA-EL model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    6. Woloszyk, Krzysztof & Garbatov, Yordan, 2024. "A probabilistic-driven framework for enhanced corrosion estimation of ship structural components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    7. Na, Kyumin & Yoon, Heonjun & Kim, Jaedong & Kim, Sungjong & Youn, Byeng D., 2023. "PERL: Probabilistic energy-ratio-based localization for boiler tube leaks using descriptors of acoustic emission signals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. Dao, Uyen & Sajid, Zaman & Khan, Faisal & Zhang, Yahui & Tran, Trung, 2023. "Modeling and analysis of internal corrosion induced failure of oil and gas pipelines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:5824-:d:1526148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.