IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i22p5732-d1522091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Environmental Tax and Energy Matter for Environmental Degradation in the UK? Evidence from Novel Fourier-Based Estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Kwaku Addai

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, European University of Lefke, 99010 Lefke, Northern Cyprus, Turkey)

  • Souha Hanna Al Geitany

    (Department of Business, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Kaslik, Jounieh P.O. Box 446, Lebanon)

  • Seyed Alireza Athari

    (Department of Business, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Kaslik, Jounieh P.O. Box 446, Lebanon
    Advanced Research Centre, European University of Lefke, 99010 Lefke, Northern Cyprus, Turkey)

  • Panteha Farmanesh

    (Faculty of Communication, Arkin University of Creative Arts & Design, 99300 Kyrenia, Northern Cyprus, Turkey)

  • Dervis Kirikkaleli

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, European University of Lefke, 99010 Lefke, Northern Cyprus, Turkey
    Department of Economics, Adnan Kassar School of Business, Lebanese American University, Beirut 03797751, Lebanon)

  • Chafic Saliba

    (Department of Business, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Kaslik, Jounieh P.O. Box 446, Lebanon)

Abstract

Currently, the UK has ambitious plans to reach net zero by 2050, despite other countries such as Russia and India targeting 2060 and 2070, respectively. Assuming that the UK emissions unceasingly decline at a given rate annually towards achieving net zero by 2050, its economy would need to ensure a reduction of 105 MtCO2 per year of its emissions from the current 2021 levels. Given that global greenhouse gas emissions have not peaked and continue to rise, the UK seeks to implement costly and aggressive emission reduction policies towards fulfilling commitments under the 2021 Glasgow Climate Pact. This paper investigates the effect of environmental taxes on environmental degradation in the UK between 2000Q1 and 2019Q4 using novel Fourier approaches. Using the novel Fourier ARDL estimator, the long-run equilibrium estimates indicate that gross domestic product and environmental tax cause a fall in carbon emissions. However, in trade and primary energy use, a unit change caused rising carbon emissions in the UK. Especially, the results indicate that environmental taxes have a negative effect on environmental degradation in the UK, and ecological tax policy could be considered as an effective channel to attain environmental sustainability. The outcome provides the following policy insights: (i) The government of the UK should support international environmental tax coordination mechanisms, especially on carbon pricing, to avoid relocation of carbon-intensive investments. (ii) The UK government must note that imposing more taxes to encourage emissions reductions could bring complexity to the tax system and unnecessarily bring costly ways to deal with climate change. Higher domestic electricity prices could disproportionately hit low-income households and create distributional cost concerns, which require benefit payouts or compensation schemes. (iii) Switching to electric vehicles simultaneously requires investments in charging infrastructure and battery technologies. To avoid this chicken-and-egg problem, the government of the UK could play a coordinating role, including deploying targeted subsidies, regulations, direct government involvement, or setting higher carbon prices in special cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwaku Addai & Souha Hanna Al Geitany & Seyed Alireza Athari & Panteha Farmanesh & Dervis Kirikkaleli & Chafic Saliba, 2024. "Do Environmental Tax and Energy Matter for Environmental Degradation in the UK? Evidence from Novel Fourier-Based Estimators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:22:p:5732-:d:1522091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/22/5732/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/22/5732/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veli YILANCI & Yilmaz OZKAN & Abdulkadir ALTINSOY, 2020. "Testing the Unemployment Hysteresis in G7 Countries: A Fresh Evidence from Fourier Threshold Unit Root Test," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 49-59, September.
    2. Mr. David C Nellor & Mr. Ronald T. McMorran, 1994. "Tax Policy and the Environment: Theory and Practice," IMF Working Papers 1994/106, International Monetary Fund.
    3. William Brock & M. Taylor, 2010. "The Green Solow model," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 127-153, June.
    4. Fang, Guochang & Tian, Lixin & Fu, Min & Sun, Mei, 2013. "The impacts of carbon tax on energy intensity and economic growth – A dynamic evolution analysis on the case of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 17-28.
    5. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    6. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2018. "The energy, environmental and economic impacts of carbon tax rate and taxation industry: A CGE based study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 558-568.
    7. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    8. Christopoulos, Dimitris K. & León-Ledesma, Miguel A., 2010. "Smooth breaks and non-linear mean reversion: Post-Bretton Woods real exchange rates," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 1076-1093, October.
    9. Robert McNown & Chung Yan Sam & Soo Khoon Goh, 2018. "Bootstrapping the autoregressive distributed lag test for cointegration," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(13), pages 1509-1521, March.
    10. Cameron Hepburn & Michael Grubb & Karsten Neuhoff & Felix Matthes & Maximilien Tse, 2006. "Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: how and why?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 137-160, January.
    11. Lin, Boqiang & Li, Xuehui, 2011. "The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5137-5146, September.
    12. Ludlow, Jorge & Enders, Walter, 2000. "Estimating non-linear ARMA models using Fourier coefficients," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 333-347.
    13. Becker-Olsen, Karen L. & Cudmore, B. Andrew & Hill, Ronald Paul, 2006. "The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 46-53, January.
    14. Sam Meng & Mahinda Siriwardana & Judith McNeill, 2013. "The Environmental and Economic Impact of the Carbon Tax in Australia," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 54(3), pages 313-332, March.
    15. Grischa Perino & Thomas Pioch, 2017. "Banning incandescent light bulbs in the shadow of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 678-686, July.
    16. Llop Maria, 2023. "Environmental Taxation and International Trade in a Tax-Distorted Economy," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, January.
    17. Omay, Tolga, 2015. "Fractional Frequency Flexible Fourier Form to approximate smooth breaks in unit root testing," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 123-126.
    18. Bruce Morley, 2012. "Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of environmental taxes," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(18), pages 1817-1820, December.
    19. Muhammad Farhan Bashir & Benjiang MA & Muhammad Adnan Bashir & Magdalena Radulescu & Umer Shahzad, 2022. "Investigating the role of environmental taxes and regulations for renewable energy consumption: evidence from developed economies," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 1262-1284, December.
    20. Rahmi Deniz Özbay & Seyed Alireza Athari & Chafic Saliba & Dervis Kirikkaleli, 2022. "Towards Environmental Sustainability in China: Role of Globalization and Hydroelectricity Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    21. Hashemizadeh, Ali & Ju, Yanbing & Abadi, Faezeh Zareian Baghdad, 2024. "Policy design for renewable energy development based on government support: A system dynamics model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PB).
    22. Krarti, Moncef & Dubey, Kankana & Howarth, Nicholas, 2019. "Energy productivity analysis framework for buildings: a case study of GCC region," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 1251-1265.
    23. Solow, Robert, 1993. "An almost practical step toward sustainability," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 162-172, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khyati Kathuria & Nand Kumar, 2022. "Are exports and imports of India’s trading partners cointegrated? Evidence from Fourier bootstrap ARDL procedure," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1177-1191, March.
    2. Emrah Sofuoğlu & Dervis Kirikkaleli, 2023. "The effect of mineral saving and energy on the ecological footprint in an emerging market: evidence from novel Fourier based approaches," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Nihal Ahmed & Adnan Ahmed Sheikh & Zeeshan Hamid & Piotr Senkus & Ricardo Cosio Borda & Aneta Wysokińska-Senkus & Waldemar Glabiszewski, 2022. "Exploring the Causal Relationship among Green Taxes, Energy Intensity, and Energy Consumption in Nordic Countries: Dumitrescu and Hurlin Causality Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Chien-Ming Wang & Tsung-Pao Wu, 2022. "Does tourism promote or reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from major tourist arrival countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3334-3355, March.
    5. Karmaker, Shamal Chandra & Hosan, Shahadat & Chapman, Andrew J. & Saha, Bidyut Baran, 2021. "The role of environmental taxes on technological innovation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    6. Teresa Famulska & Jan Kaczmarzyk & Małgorzata Grząba-Włoszek, 2022. "Environmental Taxes in the Member States of the European Union—Trends in Energy Taxes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Esteve, Vicente & Tamarit, Cecilio, 2012. "Threshold cointegration and nonlinear adjustment between CO2 and income: The Environmental Kuznets Curve in Spain, 1857–2007," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 2148-2156.
    8. Jin, Wei & Shi, Xunpeng & Zhang, Lin, 2021. "Energy transition without dirty capital stranding," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Chen, Jiamin & Chen, Yuwei, 2024. "Does natural resources rent promote carbon neutrality: The role of digital finance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Amjad Ali & Marc Audi & Ismail Senturk & Yannick Roussel, 2022. "Do Sectoral Growth Promote CO2 Emissions in Pakistan? Time Series Analysis in Presence of Structural Break," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(2), pages 410-425, March.
    11. Genovaitė Liobikienė & Mindaugas Butkus & Kristina Matuzevičiūtė, 2019. "The Contribution of Energy Taxes to Climate Change Policy in the European Union (EU)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-23, April.
    12. Aiwen Zhao & Xiaoqian Song & Jiajie Li & Qingchun Yuan & Yingshun Pei & Ruilin Li & Michael Hitch, 2023. "Effects of Carbon Tax on Urban Carbon Emission Reduction: Evidence in China Environmental Governance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.
    13. De Juan Fernández, Aránzazu & Poncela, Pilar & Rodríguez Caballero, Carlos Vladimir, 2022. "Economic activity and climate change," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 35044, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    14. Shu Mo & Ting Wang, 2022. "Synergistic Effects of International Oil Price Fluctuations and Carbon Tax Policies on the Energy–Economy–Environment System in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Muhammad Ahad & Zulfiqar Ali Imran, 2023. "The role of shadow economy to determine CO2 emission in Pakistan: evidence from novel dynamic simulated ARDL model and wavelet coherence analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 3043-3071, April.
    16. Christina Anderl & Guglielmo Maria Caporale, 2021. "Nonlinearities and asymmetric adjustment to PPP in an exchange rate model with inflation expectations," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 49(6), pages 937-959, August.
    17. Zheng, Lei & Hao, Jia & Ban, Nannan, 2023. "Do recycling and regulations influence trade-adjusted resource consumption? Exploring the role of renewable energy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Brock, William A. & Taylor, M. Scott, 2005. "Economic Growth and the Environment: A Review of Theory and Empirics," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 28, pages 1749-1821, Elsevier.
    19. Irina Georgescu & Jani Kinnunen, 2024. "Dynamic interactions between GDP, renewable energy, innovation, and CO2 emissions in Finland: a fourier-augmented ARDL analysis," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Md. Emran Hossain & Ehsan Ullah & Mohd Ziaur Rehman & Mohammad Haseeb & Miguel Angel Esquivias, 2024. "Going Sustainable or Going Extinct: The Consequences of Clean Technologies, Green Finance, and Natural Resources on the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:22:p:5732-:d:1522091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.