IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i20p5110-d1498776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EOS: Impact Evaluation of Electric Vehicle Adoption on Peak Load Shaving Using Agent-Based Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • William J. Howell

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New York Institute of Technology, New York, NY 10023, USA)

  • Ziqian Dong

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New York Institute of Technology, New York, NY 10023, USA)

  • Roberto Rojas-Cessa

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102, USA)

Abstract

The increasing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) by the general population creates an opportunity to deploy the energy storage capability of EVs for performing peak energy shaving in their households and ultimately in their neighborhood grid during surging demand. However, the impact of the adoption rate in a neighborhood might be counterbalanced by the energy demand of EVs during off-peak hours. Therefore, achieving optimal peak energy shaving is a product of a sensitive balancing process that depends on the EV adoption rate. In this paper, we propose EOS, an agent-based simulation model, to represent independent household energy usage and estimate the real-time neighborhood energy consumption and peak shaving energy amount of a neighborhood. This study uses Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) and the American Time Use Survey (ATUS) data to model realistic real-time household energy use. We evaluate the impact of the EV adoption rates of a neighborhood on performing energy peak shaving during sudden energy surges. Our findings reveal these trade-offs and, specifically, a reduction of up to 30% of the peak neighborhood energy usage for the optimal neighborhood EV adoption rate in a 1089 household neighborhood.

Suggested Citation

  • William J. Howell & Ziqian Dong & Roberto Rojas-Cessa, 2024. "EOS: Impact Evaluation of Electric Vehicle Adoption on Peak Load Shaving Using Agent-Based Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:20:p:5110-:d:1498776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/20/5110/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/20/5110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srivastava, Anurag K. & Annabathina, Bharath & Kamalasadan, Sukumar, 2010. "The Challenges and Policy Options for Integrating Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle into the Electric Grid," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 83-91, April.
    2. Barbour, Edward & Parra, David & Awwad, Zeyad & González, Marta C., 2018. "Community energy storage: A smart choice for the smart grid?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 489-497.
    3. Karakaya, Emrah & Hidalgo, Antonio & Nuur, Cali, 2015. "Motivators for adoption of photovoltaic systems at grid parity: A case study from Southern Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1090-1098.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neij, Lena & Heiskanen, Eva & Strupeit, Lars, 2017. "The deployment of new energy technologies and the need for local learning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 274-283.
    2. Zhu, Jianquan & Xia, Yunrui & Mo, Xiemin & Guo, Ye & Chen, Jiajun, 2021. "A bilevel bidding and clearing model incorporated with a pricing strategy for the trading of energy storage use rights," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Hafiz, Faeza & Rodrigo de Queiroz, Anderson & Fajri, Poria & Husain, Iqbal, 2019. "Energy management and optimal storage sizing for a shared community: A multi-stage stochastic programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 42-54.
    4. Darmani, Anna & Rickne, Annika & Hidalgo, Antonio & Arvidsson, Niklas, 2016. "When outcomes are the reflection of the analysis criteria: A review of the tradable green certificate assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 372-381.
    5. Raslavičius, Laurencas & Azzopardi, Brian & Keršys, Artūras & Starevičius, Martynas & Bazaras, Žilvinas & Makaras, Rolandas, 2015. "Electric vehicles challenges and opportunities: Lithuanian review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 786-800.
    6. Aghamolaei, Reihaneh & Shamsi, Mohammad Haris & O’Donnell, James, 2020. "Feasibility analysis of community-based PV systems for residential districts: A comparison of on-site centralized and distributed PV installations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 793-808.
    7. Fioriti, Davide & Frangioni, Antonio & Poli, Davide, 2021. "Optimal sizing of energy communities with fair revenue sharing and exit clauses: Value, role and business model of aggregators and users," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    8. Schopfer, S. & Tiefenbeck, V. & Staake, T., 2018. "Economic assessment of photovoltaic battery systems based on household load profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 229-248.
    9. Henni, Sarah & Staudt, Philipp & Weinhardt, Christof, 2021. "A sharing economy for residential communities with PV-coupled battery storage: Benefits, pricing and participant matching," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    10. Kerscher, Selina & Koirala, Arpan & Arboleya, Pablo, 2024. "Grid-optimal energy community planning from a systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Kavousi-Fard, Abdollah & Abbasi, Alireza & Rostami, Mohammad-Amin & Khosravi, Abbas, 2015. "Optimal distribution feeder reconfiguration for increasing the penetration of plug-in electric vehicles and minimizing network costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1693-1703.
    12. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2021. "Power outages, climate events and renewable energy: Reviewing energy storage policy and regulatory options for Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    13. Hackbarth, André, 2018. "Attitudes, preferences, and intentions of German households concerning participation in peer-to-peer electricity trading," Reutlingen Working Papers on Marketing & Management 2019-2, Reutlingen University, ESB Business School.
    14. Nurwidiana Nurwidiana & Bertha Maya Sopha & Adhika Widyaparaga, 2022. "Simulating Socio-Technical Transitions of Photovoltaics Using Empirically Based Hybrid Simulation-Optimization Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Resch, Matthias & Bühler, Jochen & Klausen, Mira & Sumper, Andreas, 2017. "Impact of operation strategies of large scale battery systems on distribution grid planning in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1042-1063.
    16. Karakaya, Emrah & Nuur, Cali & Hidalgo, Antonio, 2016. "Business model challenge: Lessons from a local solar company," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1026-1035.
    17. Gupta, Ruchi & Pena-Bello, Alejandro & Streicher, Kai Nino & Roduner, Cattia & Farhat, Yamshid & Thöni, David & Patel, Martin Kumar & Parra, David, 2021. "Spatial analysis of distribution grid capacity and costs to enable massive deployment of PV, electric mobility and electric heating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    18. Xian Zhao & Siqi Wang & Xiaoyue Wang, 2018. "Characteristics and Trends of Research on New Energy Vehicle Reliability Based on the Web of Science," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Obara, Shin'ya & Hamanaka, Ryo & El-Sayed, Abeer Galal, 2019. "Design methods for microgrids to address seasonal energy availability – A case study of proposed Showa Antarctic Station retrofits," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 711-727.
    20. Bruno Domenech & Gema Calleja & Jordi Olivella, 2021. "Residential Photovoltaic Profitability with Storage under the New Spanish Regulation: A Multi-Scenario Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:20:p:5110-:d:1498776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.