IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i20p5110-d1498776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EOS: Impact Evaluation of Electric Vehicle Adoption on Peak Load Shaving Using Agent-Based Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • William J. Howell

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New York Institute of Technology, New York, NY 10023, USA)

  • Ziqian Dong

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New York Institute of Technology, New York, NY 10023, USA)

  • Roberto Rojas-Cessa

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102, USA)

Abstract

The increasing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) by the general population creates an opportunity to deploy the energy storage capability of EVs for performing peak energy shaving in their households and ultimately in their neighborhood grid during surging demand. However, the impact of the adoption rate in a neighborhood might be counterbalanced by the energy demand of EVs during off-peak hours. Therefore, achieving optimal peak energy shaving is a product of a sensitive balancing process that depends on the EV adoption rate. In this paper, we propose EOS, an agent-based simulation model, to represent independent household energy usage and estimate the real-time neighborhood energy consumption and peak shaving energy amount of a neighborhood. This study uses Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) and the American Time Use Survey (ATUS) data to model realistic real-time household energy use. We evaluate the impact of the EV adoption rates of a neighborhood on performing energy peak shaving during sudden energy surges. Our findings reveal these trade-offs and, specifically, a reduction of up to 30% of the peak neighborhood energy usage for the optimal neighborhood EV adoption rate in a 1089 household neighborhood.

Suggested Citation

  • William J. Howell & Ziqian Dong & Roberto Rojas-Cessa, 2024. "EOS: Impact Evaluation of Electric Vehicle Adoption on Peak Load Shaving Using Agent-Based Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:20:p:5110-:d:1498776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/20/5110/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/20/5110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srivastava, Anurag K. & Annabathina, Bharath & Kamalasadan, Sukumar, 2010. "The Challenges and Policy Options for Integrating Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle into the Electric Grid," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 83-91, April.
    2. Barbour, Edward & Parra, David & Awwad, Zeyad & González, Marta C., 2018. "Community energy storage: A smart choice for the smart grid?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 489-497.
    3. Karakaya, Emrah & Hidalgo, Antonio & Nuur, Cali, 2015. "Motivators for adoption of photovoltaic systems at grid parity: A case study from Southern Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1090-1098.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neij, Lena & Heiskanen, Eva & Strupeit, Lars, 2017. "The deployment of new energy technologies and the need for local learning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 274-283.
    2. Zhu, Jianquan & Xia, Yunrui & Mo, Xiemin & Guo, Ye & Chen, Jiajun, 2021. "A bilevel bidding and clearing model incorporated with a pricing strategy for the trading of energy storage use rights," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Luca Brunelli & Emiliano Borri & Anna Laura Pisello & Andrea Nicolini & Carles Mateu & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2024. "Thermal Energy Storage in Energy Communities: A Perspective Overview through a Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Hafiz, Faeza & Rodrigo de Queiroz, Anderson & Fajri, Poria & Husain, Iqbal, 2019. "Energy management and optimal storage sizing for a shared community: A multi-stage stochastic programming approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 42-54.
    5. Darmani, Anna & Rickne, Annika & Hidalgo, Antonio & Arvidsson, Niklas, 2016. "When outcomes are the reflection of the analysis criteria: A review of the tradable green certificate assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 372-381.
    6. Raslavičius, Laurencas & Azzopardi, Brian & Keršys, Artūras & Starevičius, Martynas & Bazaras, Žilvinas & Makaras, Rolandas, 2015. "Electric vehicles challenges and opportunities: Lithuanian review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 786-800.
    7. Aghamolaei, Reihaneh & Shamsi, Mohammad Haris & O’Donnell, James, 2020. "Feasibility analysis of community-based PV systems for residential districts: A comparison of on-site centralized and distributed PV installations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 793-808.
    8. Jurasz, Jakub & Dąbek, Paweł B. & Kaźmierczak, Bartosz & Kies, Alexander & Wdowikowski, Marcin, 2018. "Large scale complementary solar and wind energy sources coupled with pumped-storage hydroelectricity for Lower Silesia (Poland)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 183-192.
    9. Fioriti, Davide & Frangioni, Antonio & Poli, Davide, 2021. "Optimal sizing of energy communities with fair revenue sharing and exit clauses: Value, role and business model of aggregators and users," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    10. Fabian Scheller & Isabel Doser & Emily Schulte & Simon Johanning & Russell McKenna & Thomas Bruckner, 2021. "Stakeholder dynamics in residential solar energy adoption: findings from focus group discussions in Germany," Papers 2104.14240, arXiv.org.
    11. Schopfer, S. & Tiefenbeck, V. & Staake, T., 2018. "Economic assessment of photovoltaic battery systems based on household load profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 229-248.
    12. Grimm, Veronika & Kretschmer, Sandra & Mehl, Simon, 2020. "Green innovations: The organizational setup of pilot projects and its influence on consumer perceptions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    13. Àlex Alonso & Jordi de la Hoz & Helena Martín & Sergio Coronas & José Matas, 2021. "Individual vs. Community: Economic Assessment of Energy Management Systems under Different Regulatory Frameworks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, January.
    14. Henni, Sarah & Staudt, Philipp & Weinhardt, Christof, 2021. "A sharing economy for residential communities with PV-coupled battery storage: Benefits, pricing and participant matching," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    15. Hansjörg Drewello, 2022. "Towards a Theory of Local Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Kerscher, Selina & Koirala, Arpan & Arboleya, Pablo, 2024. "Grid-optimal energy community planning from a systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    17. Rogna, Marco, 2020. "A first-phase screening method for site selection of large-scale solar plants with an application to Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    18. Giacomo Talluri & Gabriele Maria Lozito & Francesco Grasso & Carlos Iturrino Garcia & Antonio Luchetta, 2021. "Optimal Battery Energy Storage System Scheduling within Renewable Energy Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Kavousi-Fard, Abdollah & Abbasi, Alireza & Rostami, Mohammad-Amin & Khosravi, Abbas, 2015. "Optimal distribution feeder reconfiguration for increasing the penetration of plug-in electric vehicles and minimizing network costs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1693-1703.
    20. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2021. "Power outages, climate events and renewable energy: Reviewing energy storage policy and regulatory options for Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:20:p:5110-:d:1498776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.