IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i18p4736-d1483478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying Agricultural Residues Biomass Resources and the Energy Potentials with Characterization of Their Nature and Ethiopian Case Consumption Inference

Author

Listed:
  • Angesom Gebrezgabiher Tesfay

    (School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Ethiopian-Institute of Technology-Mekelle, Mekelle University, Mekelle P.O. Box 231, Ethiopia)

  • Asfafaw Haileselassie Tesfay

    (School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Ethiopian-Institute of Technology-Mekelle, Mekelle University, Mekelle P.O. Box 231, Ethiopia
    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Muyiwa Samuel Adaramola

    (Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1433 Akershus, Norway)

Abstract

As the Ethiopian energy demand urges for fuel options, it is essential to identify biomass fuels and estimate their energy potential. This study quantified the agricultural residues’ biomass resources and their energy potential. Further analyzed and characterized the potential nature through quantitative and qualitative methodologies with descriptive, comparative, explanatory, and exploratory studies. Five-year crop yield data of 27 crops were collected from the Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia. Conversion factors into energy were surveyed from the literature. Subsequently, the residues available and their energy potentials were estimated. Mathematical and statistical analysis methods were considered in an Excel sheet. A new measure of natural potential capacity for energy was defined in two views (resource and application). Accordingly, their potential capacities were rated and prioritized comparatively. The gross energy potential of all the residues was estimated to be 494.7 PJ. With 30% collecting efficiency, it corresponds to the imported petroleum fuel in 2018. Five major crops contributed to 80% of this gross potential. Maize and sorghum presented the highest potential due to their superior yields and good natural potential capacities. They are also well distributed in all the regions. Cotton and maize’s natural potential capacities are the best in both views. Generally, commercial crops presented better capacities than the major cereal crops. However, major crops’ energy potentials dominated due to their yields. These resources need mobilization into modern and commercially accessible fuel forms that await intervention. Densified and carbonized forms of consumption in nearby industries and households are most viable for the Ethiopian case.

Suggested Citation

  • Angesom Gebrezgabiher Tesfay & Asfafaw Haileselassie Tesfay & Muyiwa Samuel Adaramola, 2024. "Quantifying Agricultural Residues Biomass Resources and the Energy Potentials with Characterization of Their Nature and Ethiopian Case Consumption Inference," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:18:p:4736-:d:1483478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/18/4736/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/18/4736/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Toklu, E., 2017. "Biomass energy potential and utilization in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 235-244.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdul, Daud & Wenqi, Jiang & Tanveer, Arsalan, 2022. "Prioritization of renewable energy source for electricity generation through AHP-VIKOR integrated methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1018-1032.
    2. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    3. Gupta, Shubhi & Gupta, Goutam Kishore & Mondal, Monoj Kumar, 2019. "Slow pyrolysis of chemically treated walnut shell for valuable products: Effect of process parameters and in-depth product analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 665-676.
    4. Jung, Sungyup & Lee, Jechan & Moon, Deok Hyun & Kim, Ki-Hyun & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2021. "Upgrading biogas into syngas through dry reforming," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    5. Alba Mondragón-Valero & Borja Velázquez-Martí & Domingo M. Salazar & Isabel López-Cortés, 2018. "Influence of Fertilization and Rootstocks in the Biomass Energy Characterization of Prunus dulcis (Miller)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Wajahat Ullah Khan Tareen & Zuha Anjum & Nabila Yasin & Leenah Siddiqui & Ifzana Farhat & Suheel Abdullah Malik & Saad Mekhilef & Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian & Ben Horan & Mohamed Darwish & Muhammad Aamir &, 2018. "The Prospective Non-Conventional Alternate and Renewable Energy Sources in Pakistan—A Focus on Biomass Energy for Power Generation, Transportation, and Industrial Fuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-49, September.
    7. Noushabadi, Abolfazl Sajadi & Dashti, Amir & Ahmadijokani, Farhad & Hu, Jinguang & Mohammadi, Amir H., 2021. "Estimation of higher heating values (HHVs) of biomass fuels based on ultimate analysis using machine learning techniques and improved equation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 550-562.
    8. Sharafi laleh, Shayan & Fatemi Alavi, Seyed Hamed & Soltani, Saeed & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, Marc A., 2024. "A novel supercritical carbon dioxide combined cycle fueled by biomass: Thermodynamic assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    9. Sheng Zhong & Shuwen Niu & Yipeng Wang, 2018. "Research on Potential Evaluation and Sustainable Development of Rural Biomass Energy in Gansu Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Dennis Krüger & Özge Çepelioğullar Mutlu, 2021. "Demonstration of a Top-Lit Updraft Based Pyrolytic Burner with Low Emission Operation and Automatic Process Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Mantas Svazas & Valentinas Navickas, 2024. "Energy Transformation Development Strategies: Evaluation of Asset Conversion in the Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Naqvi, Salman Raza & Tariq, Rumaisa & Hameed, Zeeshan & Ali, Imtiaz & Naqvi, Muhammad & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Ceylan, Selim & Rashid, Harith & Ahmad, Junaid & Taqvi, Syed A. & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2019. "Pyrolysis of high ash sewage sludge: Kinetics and thermodynamic analysis using Coats-Redfern method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 854-860.
    13. Zhang, Xiaofeng & Yan, Renshi & Zeng, Rong & Zhu, Ruilin & Kong, Xiaoying & He, Yecong & Li, Hongqiang, 2022. "Integrated performance optimization of a biomass-based hybrid hydrogen/thermal energy storage system for building and hydrogen vehicles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 801-818.
    14. KS Rajmohan & C Ramya & Sunita Varjani, 2021. "Trends and advances in bioenergy production and sustainable solid waste management," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(6), pages 1059-1085, September.
    15. Atilgan Atilgan & Anna Krakowiak-Bal & Hasan Ertop & Burak Saltuk & Mateusz Malinowski, 2023. "The Energy Potential of Waste from Banana Production: A Case Study of the Mediterranean Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-13, July.
    16. Ibrahim Mosly & Anas A. Makki, 2018. "Current Status and Willingness to Adopt Renewable Energy Technologies in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Tan, Liping & Cai, Lei & Fu, Yidan & Zhou, Zining & Guan, Yanwen, 2023. "Numerical investigation of biomass and liquefied natural gas driven oxy-fuel combustion power system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 94-104.
    18. Dal-Bó, Vanessa & Lira, Taisa & Arrieche, Leonardo & Bacelos, Marcelo, 2019. "Process synthesis for coffee husks to energy using hierarchical approaches," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 195-206.
    19. Avcıoğlu, A.O. & Dayıoğlu, M.A. & Türker, U., 2019. "Assessment of the energy potential of agricultural biomass residues in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 610-619.
    20. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Liliana M. E. F. Loureiro & Letícia C. R. Sá & Hugo F. C. Silva, 2020. "Waste Recovery through Thermochemical Conversion Technologies: A Case Study with Several Portuguese Agroforestry By-Products," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:18:p:4736-:d:1483478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.