IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i17p4461-d1472194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of the Life-Cycle Impacts of the Concentrating Solar Power with the Product Environmental Footprint and ReCiPe Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Le Quyen Luu

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Edifico 9, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Maurizio Cellura

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Edifico 9, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Sonia Longo

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Edifico 9, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Francesco Guarino

    (Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Edifico 9, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

Concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies have the potential to reduce the carbon emissions in the economy and energy sector. The growing significance of solar energy sources in addressing climate change highlights the necessity for thorough assessments of their environmental impacts. This paper explores two different life-cycle impact assessment methods, ReCiPe and Product Environmental Footprint, using CSP plants with various receiver systems and heat-transfer fluids as a case study. In terms of the overall life-cycle impact, solar towers are shown to have advantages over parabolic troughs. Most of the life-cycle impacts of solar towers are lower than those of parabolic troughs, ranging from 8% to 112%, except for human toxicity and land use impacts. However, there is not much difference between the studied heat-transfer fluids, with the variance of most impacts being less than around 1%. The single-score results indicates that the ReCiPe method assigns significance to human health impacts, while the product environmental footprint method gives equal attention to all aspects. Meanwhile the comparison of components’ contributions quantified by the two methods shows the same results for more than half of the impact categories.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Quyen Luu & Maurizio Cellura & Sonia Longo & Francesco Guarino, 2024. "A Comparison of the Life-Cycle Impacts of the Concentrating Solar Power with the Product Environmental Footprint and ReCiPe Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4461-:d:1472194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4461/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4461/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vignarooban, K. & Xu, Xinhai & Arvay, A. & Hsu, K. & Kannan, A.M., 2015. "Heat transfer fluids for concentrating solar power systems – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 383-396.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Shengchun & Wang, Zhifeng & Wu, Zhiyong & Bai, Fengwu & Huang, Pingrui, 2019. "Numerical investigation of the heat transport in a very loose packed granular bed air receiver with a non-uniform energy flux distribution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 987-998.
    2. Sadeghi, Shayan & Ghandehariun, Samane, 2022. "A standalone solar thermochemical water splitting hydrogen plant with high-temperature molten salt: Thermodynamic and economic analyses and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    3. Delise, T. & Tizzoni, A.C. & Menale, C. & Telling, M.T.F. & Bubbico, R. & Crescenzi, T. & Corsaro, N. & Sau, S. & Licoccia, S., 2020. "Technical and economic analysis of a CSP plant presenting a low freezing ternary mixture as storage and transfer fluid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Zhao, Yawen & Hong, Hui & Jin, Hongguang, 2017. "Optimization of the solar field size for the solar–coal hybrid system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1162-1172.
    5. Bravo, Ruben & Ortiz, Carlos & Chacartegui, Ricardo & Friedrich, Daniel, 2021. "Multi-objective optimisation and guidelines for the design of dispatchable hybrid solar power plants with thermochemical energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PB).
    6. Mostafavi Tehrani, S. Saeed & Shoraka, Yashar & Nithyanandam, Karthik & Taylor, Robert A., 2019. "Shell-and-tube or packed bed thermal energy storage systems integrated with a concentrated solar power: A techno-economic comparison of sensible and latent heat systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 887-910.
    7. Michał Jurczyk & Tomasz Spietz & Agata Czardybon & Szymon Dobras & Karina Ignasiak & Łukasz Bartela & Wojciech Uchman & Jakub Ochmann, 2024. "Review of Thermal Energy Storage Materials for Application in Large-Scale Integrated Energy Systems—Methodology for Matching Heat Storage Solutions for Given Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-28, July.
    8. Adrián Caraballo & Santos Galán-Casado & Ángel Caballero & Sara Serena, 2021. "Molten Salts for Sensible Thermal Energy Storage: A Review and an Energy Performance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Feng, Penghui & Wu, Zhen & Zhang, Yang & Yang, Fusheng & Wang, Yuqi & Zhang, Zaoxiao, 2018. "Multi-level configuration and optimization of a thermal energy storage system using a metal hydride pair," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 25-36.
    10. Yang, S. & Sensoy, T.S. & Ordonez, J.C., 2018. "Dynamic 3D volume element model of a parabolic trough solar collector for simulation and optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 509-526.
    11. Saranprabhu, M.K. & Rajan, K.S., 2019. "Magnesium oxide nanoparticles dispersed solar salt with improved solid phase thermal conductivity and specific heat for latent heat thermal energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 451-459.
    12. Peiró, Gerard & Prieto, Cristina & Gasia, Jaume & Jové, Aleix & Miró, Laia & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2018. "Two-tank molten salts thermal energy storage system for solar power plants at pilot plant scale: Lessons learnt and recommendations for its design, start-up and operation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 236-248.
    13. Wang, Wujun & Fan, Liwu & Laumert, Björn, 2021. "A theoretical heat transfer analysis of different indirectly-irradiated receiver designs for high-temperature concentrating solar power applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1983-1993.
    14. Wu, Chunlei & Wang, Qing & Wang, Xinmin & Sun, Shipeng & Wang, Yuqi & Wu, Shuang & Bai, Jingru & Sheng, Hongyu & Zhang, Jinghui, 2024. "Al2O3 nanoparticles integration for comprehensive enhancement of eutectic salt thermal performance: Experimental design, molecular dynamics calculations, and system simulation studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    15. Mena, R. & Escobar, R. & Lorca, Á. & Negrete-Pincetic, M. & Olivares, D., 2019. "The impact of concentrated solar power in electric power systems: A Chilean case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 258-283.
    16. Zhang, Qiangqiang & Li, Xin & Wang, Zhifeng & Li, Zhi & Liu, Hong, 2018. "Function testing and failure analysis of control system for molten salt receiver system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 260-268.
    17. Bai, Zhang & Gu, Yucheng & Wang, Shuoshuo & Jiang, Tieliu & Kong, Debin & Li, Qi, 2023. "Applying the solar solid particles as heat carrier to enhance the solar-driven biomass gasification with dynamic operation power generation performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    18. Conroy, Tim & Collins, Maurice N. & Fisher, James & Grimes, Ronan, 2018. "Thermal and mechanical analysis of a sodium-cooled solar receiver operating under a novel heliostat aiming point strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 590-614.
    19. Sau, S. & Corsaro, N. & Crescenzi, T. & D’Ottavi, C. & Liberatore, R. & Licoccia, S. & Russo, V. & Tarquini, P. & Tizzoni, A.C., 2016. "Techno-economic comparison between CSP plants presenting two different heat transfer fluids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 96-109.
    20. Du, Lichan & Ding, Jing & Tian, Heqing & Wang, Weilong & Wei, Xiaolan & Song, Ming, 2017. "Thermal properties and thermal stability of the ternary eutectic salt NaCl-CaCl2-MgCl2 used in high-temperature thermal energy storage process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1225-1230.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4461-:d:1472194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.