IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i16p3865-d1450657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Fracturing Expansion Law of Shale Reservoir by Supercritical CO 2 Fracturing and Mechanism Revealing

Author

Listed:
  • Li Wang

    (Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company, Wuhan 430223, China)

  • Aiwei Zheng

    (Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company, Wuhan 430223, China)

  • Wentao Lu

    (Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company, Wuhan 430223, China)

  • Tong Shen

    (Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company, Wuhan 430223, China)

  • Weixi Wang

    (Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company, Wuhan 430223, China)

  • Lai Wei

    (Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company, Wuhan 430223, China)

  • Zhen Chang

    (Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company, Wuhan 430223, China)

  • Qingchao Li

    (School of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

Abstract

The rapid expansion of reservoir fractures and the enlargement of the area affected by working fluids can be accomplished solely through fracturing operations of oilfield working fluids in geological reservoirs. Supercritical CO 2 is regarded as an ideal medium for shale reservoir fracturing owing to the inherent advantages of environmental friendliness, excellent capacity, and high stability. However, CO 2 gas channeling and complex propagation of fractures in shale reservoirs hindered the commercialization of Supercritical CO 2 fracturing technology. Herein, a simulation method for Supercritical CO 2 fracturing based on cohesive force units is proposed to investigate the crack propagation behavior of CO 2 fracturing technology under different construction parameters. Furthermore, the shale fracture propagation mechanism of Supercritical CO 2 fracturing fluid is elucidated. The results indicated that the propagation ability of reservoir fractures and Mises stress are influenced by the fracturing fluid viscosity, fracturing azimuth angle, and reservoir conditions (temperature and pressure). An azimuth angle of 30° can achieve a maximum Mises stress of 3.213 × 10 7 Pa and a crack width of 1.669 × 10 −2 m. However, an apparent viscosity of 14 × 10 −6 Pa·s results in a crack width of only 2.227 × 10 −2 m and a maximum Mises stress of 4.459 × 10 7 Pa. Additionally, a weaker fracture propagation ability and reduced Mises stress are exhibited at the fracturing fluid injection rate. As a straightforward model to synergistically investigate the fracture propagation behavior of shale reservoirs, this work provides new insights and strategies for the efficient extraction of shale reservoirs.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Wang & Aiwei Zheng & Wentao Lu & Tong Shen & Weixi Wang & Lai Wei & Zhen Chang & Qingchao Li, 2024. "Analysis of Fracturing Expansion Law of Shale Reservoir by Supercritical CO 2 Fracturing and Mechanism Revealing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:16:p:3865-:d:1450657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/16/3865/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/16/3865/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bo Zhang & Xiao Li & Zhaobin Zhang & Yanfang Wu & Yusong Wu & Yu Wang, 2016. "Numerical Investigation of Influence of In-Situ Stress Ratio, Injection Rate and Fluid Viscosity on Hydraulic Fracture Propagation Using a Distinct Element Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Fleming, David A. & Measham, Thomas G., 2015. "Local economic impacts of an unconventional energy boom: the coal seam gas industry in Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(1), January.
    3. Zhang, Bo & Guo, Tiankui & Qu, Zhanqing & Wang, Jiwei & Chen, Ming & Liu, Xiaoqiang, 2023. "Numerical simulation of fracture propagation and production performance in a fractured geothermal reservoir using a 2D FEM-based THMD coupling model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    4. Naomi Carmon & Uri Shamir & Sigalit Meiron-Pistiner, 1997. "Water-sensitive Urban Planning: Protecting Groundwater," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 413-434.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bennett, Patrick & Ravetti, Chiara & Wong, Po Yin, 2021. "Losing in a boom: Long-term consequences of a local economic shock for female labour market outcomes," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Omar H. M. N. Bashar, 2015. "The Trickle‐down Effect of the Mining Boom in Australia: Fact or Myth?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 91(S1), pages 94-108, June.
    3. Marcos-Martinez, Raymundo & Measham, Thomas G. & Fleming-Muñoz, David A., 2019. "Economic impacts of early unconventional gas mining: Lessons from the coal seam gas industry in New South Wales, Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 338-346.
    4. Loughrey, Jason & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Meredith, David & Murphy, Ger & Shanahan, Ultan & Miller, Corina, 2018. "The Local Impact of Cattle Farming," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276231, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Calzada Olvera, Beatriz, 2024. "Is the Dutch disease well and alive? A cross-country assessment of mining spillovers on employment in the 2002–2014 period," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Windle, Jill & Rolfe, John, 2014. "Valuation framing and attribute scope variation in a choice experiment to asses the impacts of changing land use from agriculture to mining," 2014 Conference (58th), February 4-7, 2014, Port Macquarie, Australia 165888, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    7. David A. Fleming‐Muñoz & Lavinia Poruschi & Thomas Measham & Jacqui Meyers & Magnus Moglia, 2020. "Economic vulnerability and regional implications of a low carbon emissions future," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 575-604, July.
    8. David A. Fleming & Thomas G. Measham & Dusan Paredes, 2015. "Understanding the resource curse (or blessing) across national and regional scales: Theory, empirical challenges and an application," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(4), pages 624-639, October.
    9. Thomas Moritz & Thomas Ejdemo & Patrik Söderholm & Linda Wårell, 2017. "The local employment impacts of mining: an econometric analysis of job multipliers in northern Sweden," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 30(1), pages 53-65, April.
    10. Miljkovic, Dragan & Ripplinger, David, 2016. "Labor market impacts of U.S. tight oil development: The case of the Bakken," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 306-312.
    11. Duncan, Alan & Harris, Mark N. & Mavisakalyan, Astghik & Nguyen, Toan, 2020. "Migration flows in commodity cycles: Assessing the role of migration policies," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    12. Lai, Po-Hsin & Lyons, Kevin D. & Gudergan, Siegfried P. & Grimstad, Sidsel, 2017. "Understanding the psychological impact of unconventional gas developments in affected communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 492-501.
    13. De Valck, Jeremy & Williams, Galina & Kuik, Swee, 2021. "Does coal mining benefit local communities in the long run? A sustainability perspective on regional Queensland, Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Higgs, Helen & Lien, Gudbrand & Worthington, Andrew C., 2015. "Australian evidence on the role of interregional flows, production capacity, and generation mix in wholesale electricity prices and price volatility," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 172-181.
    15. Wang, Zhipeng & Ning, Zhengfu & Guo, Wenting & Zhan, Jie & Chen, Zhangxin, 2024. "DC electric field assisted heat extraction evaluation via water circulation in abandoned production well patterns: Semi-analytical and numerical models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    16. Odmaa Narantungalag,, 2022. "The effects of natural resource extraction on household expenditure patterns: Evidence from Mongolia," Discussion Papers 2204, School of Economics and Finance, Massey University, New Zealand.
    17. Cronshaw, Ian & Quentin Grafton, R., 2016. "A tale of two states: Development and regulation of coal bed methane extraction in Queensland and New South Wales, Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 253-263.
    18. Zhang, Airong & Moffat, Kieren, 2015. "A balancing act: The role of benefits, impacts and confidence in governance in predicting acceptance of mining in Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 25-34.
    19. Narantungalag, Odmaa, 2022. "The effects of natural resource extraction on household expenditure patterns: Evidence from Mongolia," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1077, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    20. Huong Dinh & Ben Freyens & Anne Daly & Yogi Vidyattama, 2017. "Measuring Community Economic Resilience in Australia: Estimates of Recent Levels and Trends," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 1217-1236, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:16:p:3865-:d:1450657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.