IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i15p3677-d1443037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Sustainable Approach for Site Selection of Underground Hydrogen Storage in Poland Using Deep Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Reza Derakhshani

    (Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Department of Geology, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman 7616913439, Iran)

  • Leszek Lankof

    (Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Wybickiego 7A, 31-261 Krakow, Poland)

  • Amin GhasemiNejad

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman 7616913439, Iran)

  • Alireza Zarasvandi

    (Department of Geology, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz 6135743136, Iran)

  • Mohammad Mahdi Amani Zarin

    (Department of Computer Sciences, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman 7616913439, Iran)

  • Mojtaba Zaresefat

    (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This research investigates the potential of using bedded salt formations for underground hydrogen storage. We present a novel artificial intelligence framework that employs spatial data analysis and multi-criteria decision-making to pinpoint the most appropriate sites for hydrogen storage in salt caverns. This methodology incorporates a comprehensive platform enhanced by a deep learning algorithm, specifically a convolutional neural network (CNN), to generate suitability maps for rock salt deposits for hydrogen storage. The efficacy of the CNN algorithm was assessed using metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and the Correlation Coefficient (R 2 ), with comparisons made to a real-world dataset. The CNN model showed outstanding performance, with an R 2 of 0.96, MSE of 1.97, MAE of 1.003, and RMSE of 1.4. This novel approach leverages advanced deep learning techniques to offer a unique framework for assessing the viability of underground hydrogen storage. It presents a significant advancement in the field, offering valuable insights for a wide range of stakeholders and facilitating the identification of ideal sites for hydrogen storage facilities, thereby supporting informed decision-making and sustainable energy infrastructure development.

Suggested Citation

  • Reza Derakhshani & Leszek Lankof & Amin GhasemiNejad & Alireza Zarasvandi & Mohammad Mahdi Amani Zarin & Mojtaba Zaresefat, 2024. "A Novel Sustainable Approach for Site Selection of Underground Hydrogen Storage in Poland Using Deep Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:15:p:3677-:d:1443037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/15/3677/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/15/3677/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Tongtao & Yan, Xiangzhen & Yang, Henglin & Yang, Xiujuan & Jiang, Tingting & Zhao, Shuai, 2013. "A new shape design method of salt cavern used as underground gas storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 50-61.
    2. Ayodele, T.R. & Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Odigie, O. & Munda, J.L., 2018. "A multi-criteria GIS based model for wind farm site selection using interval type-2 fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: The case study of Nigeria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1853-1869.
    3. Reza Derakhshani & Mojtaba Zaresefat & Vahid Nikpeyman & Amin GhasemiNejad & Shahram Shafieibafti & Ahmad Rashidi & Majid Nemati & Amir Raoof, 2023. "Machine Learning-Based Assessment of Watershed Morphometry in Makran," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Atici, Kazim Baris & Simsek, Ahmet Bahadir & Ulucan, Aydin & Tosun, Mustafa Umur, 2015. "A GIS-based Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis approach for wind power plant site selection," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 86-96.
    5. Tarkowski, Radosław & Lankof, Leszek & Luboń, Katarzyna & Michalski, Jan, 2024. "Hydrogen storage capacity of salt caverns and deep aquifers versus demand for hydrogen storage: A case study of Poland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ukwuoma, Chiagoziem C. & Cai, Dongsheng & Ukwuoma, Chibueze D. & Chukwuemeka, Mmesoma P. & Ayeni, Blessing O. & Ukwuoma, Chidera O. & Adeyi, Odeh Victor & Huang, Qi, 2025. "Sequential gated recurrent and self attention explainable deep learning model for predicting hydrogen production: Implications and applicability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 378(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed Ifkirne & Houssam El Bouhi & Siham Acharki & Quoc Bao Pham & Abdelouahed Farah & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh, 2022. "Multi-Criteria GIS-Based Analysis for Mapping Suitable Sites for Onshore Wind Farms in Southeast France," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Styliani Karamountzou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2023. "Suitability and Sustainability Assessment of Existing Onshore Wind Farms in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Dimitris Ioannidis & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2024. "Optimal Wind Farm Siting Using a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: Evaluating the Island of Andros, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.
    4. Yildiz, S.S., 2024. "Spatial multi-criteria decision making approach for wind farm site selection: A case study in Balıkesir, Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    5. Samuel Bimenyimana & Chen Wang & Godwin Norense Osarumwense Asemota & Jeanne Paula Ihirwe & Mucyo Ndera Tuyizere & Fidele Mwizerwa & Yiyi Mo & Martine Abiyese, 2024. "Geospatial Analysis of Wind Energy Siting Suitability in the East African Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-32, February.
    6. Kleanthis Xenitidis & Konstantinos Ioannou & Georgios Tsantopoulos & Dimitrios Myronidis, 2023. "On the Usage of Artificial Neural Networks for the Determination of Optimal Wind Farms Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-31, December.
    7. Peri, Erez & Tal, Alon, 2020. "A sustainable way forward for wind power: Assessing turbines’ environmental impacts using a holistic GIS analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    8. Konstantinos, Ioannou & Georgios, Tsantopoulos & Garyfalos, Arabatzis, 2019. "A Decision Support System methodology for selecting wind farm installation locations using AHP and TOPSIS: Case study in Eastern Macedonia and Thrace region, Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 232-246.
    9. Gao, Jianwei & Wang, Yaping & Huang, Ningbo & Wei, Lingli & Zhang, Zixuan, 2022. "Optimal site selection study of wind-photovoltaic-shared energy storage power stations based on GIS and multi-criteria decision making: A two-stage framework," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 1139-1162.
    10. Haitao Li & Jingen Deng & Qiqi Wanyan & Yongcun Feng & Arnaud Regis Kamgue Lenwoue & Chao Luo & Cheng Hui, 2021. "Numerical Investigation on Shape Optimization of Small-Spacing Twin-Well for Salt Cavern Gas Storage in Ultra-Deep Formation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    11. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    12. Baseer, M.A. & Rehman, S. & Meyer, J.P. & Alam, Md. Mahbub, 2017. "GIS-based site suitability analysis for wind farm development in Saudi Arabia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1166-1176.
    13. Llamas, Bernardo & Laín, Carlos & Castañeda, M. Cruz & Pous, Juan, 2018. "Mini-CAES as a reliable and novel approach to storing renewable energy in salt domes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 482-489.
    14. Wei, Xinxing & Shi, Xilin & Li, Yinping & Li, Peng & Ban, Shengnan & Zhao, Kai & Ma, Hongling & Liu, Hejuan & Yang, Chunhe, 2023. "A comprehensive feasibility evaluation of salt cavern oil energy storage system in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    15. Sofia Spyridonidou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2020. "Systematic Review of Site-Selection Processes in Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    16. Svetlana Revinova & Inna Lazanyuk & Bella Gabrielyan & Tatevik Shahinyan & Yevgenya Hakobyan, 2024. "Hydrogen in Energy Transition: The Problem of Economic Efficiency, Environmental Safety, and Technological Readiness of Transportation and Storage," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, July.
    17. Wu, Zhaoyuan & Zhou, Ming & Zhang, Ting & Li, Gengyin & Zhang, Yan & Liu, Xiaojuan, 2020. "Imbalance settlement evaluation for China's balancing market design via an agent-based model with a multiple criteria decision analysis method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    18. Gao, Jianwei & Wang, Yaping & Guo, Fengjia & Chen, Jiayi, 2024. "A two-stage decision framework for GIS-based site selection of wind-photovoltaic-hybrid energy storage project using LSGDM method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    19. Ceren Erdin & Halil Emre Akbaş, 2019. "A Comparative Analysis of Fuzzy TOPSIS and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for the Location Selection of Shopping Malls: A Case Study from Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Vasileiou, Margarita & Loukogeorgaki, Eva & Vagiona, Dimitra G., 2017. "GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for site selection of hybrid offshore wind and wave energy systems in Greece," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 745-757.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:15:p:3677-:d:1443037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.