IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i14p3569-d1439257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Geothermal Wellbore Model Based on the Drift-Flux Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yin Yuan

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Weiqing Li

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jiawen Zhang

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Junkai Lei

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xianghong Xu

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Lihan Bian

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Geothermal energy, being a clean energy source, has immense potential, and accurate wellbore modeling is crucial for optimizing the drilling process and ensuring safety. This paper presents a novel geothermal wellbore model based on the drift-flux approach, tested under three different temperature and pressure well conditions. The proposed model integrates the conservation equations of mass, momentum, and energy, incorporating the gas–liquid two-phase flow drift-flux model and heat transfer model. The key features include handling the heat transfer between the formation and the wellbore, addressing the slip relationship between the gas and liquid phases, and accounting for wellbore friction. The nonlinear equations are discretized using the finite difference method, and the highly nonlinear system is solved using the Newton–Raphson method. The numerical simulation, validation, and comparison with existing models demonstrate the enhanced accuracy of this model. In our tests, the model achieved a high accuracy in calculating the bottom-hole pressure and temperature, with mean relative errors (MREs) significantly lower than those of other models. For example, the MREs for the bottom-hole pressure and temperature of the Rongxi area well in Xiongan, calculated by this model, are 1.491% and 1.323%, respectively. These results offer valuable insights for optimizing drilling parameters and ensuring drilling safety. Comparisons indicate that this approach significantly outperforms others in capturing the complex dynamics of geothermal wellbores, making it a superior tool for geothermal energy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin Yuan & Weiqing Li & Jiawen Zhang & Junkai Lei & Xianghong Xu & Lihan Bian, 2024. "A Novel Geothermal Wellbore Model Based on the Drift-Flux Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:14:p:3569-:d:1439257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/14/3569/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/14/3569/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akbar, S. & Fathianpour, N. & Al Khoury, R., 2016. "A finite element model for high enthalpy two-phase flow in geothermal wellbores," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 223-236.
    2. Saeid, Sanaz & Al-Khoury, Rafid & Nick, Hamidreza M. & Hicks, Michael A., 2015. "A prototype design model for deep low-enthalpy hydrothermal systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 408-422.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Ruyang & Zhang, Kai & Ramasubramanian, Brindha & Jiang, Shu & Ramakrishna, Seeram & Tang, Yuhang, 2024. "Ensemble learning for predicting average thermal extraction load of a hydrothermal geothermal field: A case study in Guanzhong Basin, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    2. Santamarta, Juan C. & García-Gil, Alejandro & Expósito, María del Cristo & Casañas, Elías & Cruz-Pérez, Noelia & Rodríguez-Martín, Jesica & Mejías-Moreno, Miguel & Götzl, Gregor & Gemeni, Vasiliki, 2021. "The clean energy transition of heating and cooling in touristic infrastructures using shallow geothermal energy in the Canary Islands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 505-515.
    3. Daniilidis, Alexandros & Saeid, Sanaz & Doonechaly, Nima Gholizadeh, 2021. "The fault plane as the main fluid pathway: Geothermal field development options under subsurface and operational uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 927-946.
    4. Daniilidis, Alexandros & Alpsoy, Betül & Herber, Rien, 2017. "Impact of technical and economic uncertainties on the economic performance of a deep geothermal heat system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 805-816.
    5. Wang, Guiling & Liu, Guihong & Zhao, Zhihong & Liu, Yanguang & Pu, Hai, 2019. "A robust numerical method for modeling multiple wells in city-scale geothermal field based on simplified one-dimensional well model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 873-894.
    6. Willems, Cees J.L. & Nick, Hamidreza M. & Weltje, Gert Jan & Bruhn, David F., 2017. "An evaluation of interferences in heat production from low enthalpy geothermal doublets systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 500-512.
    7. Wang, Jiacheng & Tan, Xianfeng & Zhao, Zhihong & Chen, Jinfan & He, Jie & Shi, Qipeng, 2024. "Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical modeling on geothermal doublet subject to seasonal exploitation and storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    8. Aliyu, Musa D. & Chen, Hua-Peng, 2017. "Sensitivity analysis of deep geothermal reservoir: Effect of reservoir parameters on production temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 101-113.
    9. Willems, C.J.L. & M. Nick, H., 2019. "Towards optimisation of geothermal heat recovery: An example from the West Netherlands Basin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 582-593.
    10. Liu, Guihong & Wang, Guiling & Zhao, Zhihong & Ma, Feng, 2020. "A new well pattern of cluster-layout for deep geothermal reservoirs: Case study from the Dezhou geothermal field, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 484-499.
    11. Compernolle, Tine & Welkenhuysen, Kris & Petitclerc, Estelle & Maes, Dries & Piessens, Kris, 2019. "The impact of policy measures on profitability and risk in geothermal energy investments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    12. Aliyu, Musa D. & Chen, Hua-Peng, 2017. "Optimum control parameters and long-term productivity of geothermal reservoirs using coupled thermo-hydraulic process modelling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 151-165.
    13. Wang, Yang & Voskov, Denis & Khait, Mark & Saeid, Sanaz & Bruhn, David, 2021. "Influential factors on the development of a low-enthalpy geothermal reservoir: A sensitivity study of a realistic field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 641-651.
    14. Ziabakhsh-Ganji, Zaman & Nick, Hamidreza M. & Donselaar, Marinus E. & Bruhn, David F., 2018. "Synergy potential for oil and geothermal energy exploitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1433-1447.
    15. Chen, Jingping & Feng, Shaohang, 2020. "Evaluating a large geothermal absorber’s energy extraction and storage performance in a common geological condition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    16. Slatlem Vik, Hedda & Salimzadeh, Saeed & Nick, Hamidreza M., 2018. "Heat recovery from multiple-fracture enhanced geothermal systems: The effect of thermoelastic fracture interactions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 606-622.
    17. Babaei, Masoud & Nick, Hamidreza M., 2019. "Performance of low-enthalpy geothermal systems: Interplay of spatially correlated heterogeneity and well-doublet spacings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Salimzadeh, S. & Grandahl, M. & Medetbekova, M. & Nick, H.M., 2019. "A novel radial jet drilling stimulation technique for enhancing heat recovery from fractured geothermal reservoirs," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 395-409.
    19. Gascuel, Violaine & Rivard, Christine & Raymond, Jasmin, 2024. "Deep geothermal doublets versus deep borehole heat exchangers: A comparative study for cold sedimentary basins," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    20. Liu, Guihong & Pu, Hai & Zhao, Zhihong & Liu, Yanguang, 2019. "Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical modeling on well pairs in heterogeneous porous geothermal reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 631-653.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:14:p:3569-:d:1439257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.