IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i5p2448-d1087505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Axial-Probe Design for Foucault-Current Tomography: A Global Optimization Approach Based on Linear Sampling Method

Author

Listed:
  • Brahim Benaissa

    (Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Design Engineering Lab, Toyota Technological Institute, 2 Chome-12-1, Hisakata, Tempaku Ward, Nagoya 468-8511, Japan)

  • Samir Khatir

    (Soete Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark Zwijnaarde 903, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium)

  • Mohamed Soufiane Jouini

    (Department of Mathematics, Khalifa University of Sciences and Technology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates)

  • Mohamed Kamel Riahi

    (Department of Mathematics, Khalifa University of Sciences and Technology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates
    Emirates Nuclear Technology Center (ENTC), Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates
    Current address: Zarkuh Building, Khalifa University, SAN Campus, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 127788, United Arab Emirates.)

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the optimal design of axial probes, commonly used in the Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) of tube boiling in steam generators. The goal is to improve the low-frequency Foucault-current imaging of these deposits by designing a novel probe. The approach uses a combination of an inverse problem solver with global optimization to find the optimal probe characteristics by minimizing a function of merit defined using image processing techniques. The evaluation of the function of merit is computationally intensive and a surrogate optimization approach is used, incorporating a multi-particle search algorithm. The proposed design is validated through numerical experiments and aims to improve the accuracy and efficiency of identifying deposits in steam generator tubes.

Suggested Citation

  • Brahim Benaissa & Samir Khatir & Mohamed Soufiane Jouini & Mohamed Kamel Riahi, 2023. "Optimal Axial-Probe Design for Foucault-Current Tomography: A Global Optimization Approach Based on Linear Sampling Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2448-:d:1087505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2448/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/5/2448/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rommel G. Regis & Christine A. Shoemaker, 2007. "A Stochastic Radial Basis Function Method for the Global Optimization of Expensive Functions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 497-509, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juliane Müller, 2017. "SOCEMO: Surrogate Optimization of Computationally Expensive Multiobjective Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 581-596, November.
    2. Songhao Wang & Szu Hui Ng & William Benjamin Haskell, 2022. "A Multilevel Simulation Optimization Approach for Quantile Functions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 569-585, January.
    3. Juliane Müller & Christine Shoemaker & Robert Piché, 2014. "SO-I: a surrogate model algorithm for expensive nonlinear integer programming problems including global optimization applications," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 865-889, August.
    4. Zhe Zhou & Fusheng Bai, 2018. "An adaptive framework for costly black-box global optimization based on radial basis function interpolation," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 757-781, April.
    5. Liu, Haoxiang & Wang, David Z.W., 2017. "Locating multiple types of charging facilities for battery electric vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 30-55.
    6. Taimoor Akhtar & Christine Shoemaker, 2016. "Multi objective optimization of computationally expensive multi-modal functions with RBF surrogates and multi-rule selection," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 17-32, January.
    7. Nicolau Andrés-Thió & Mario Andrés Muñoz & Kate Smith-Miles, 2022. "Bifidelity Surrogate Modelling: Showcasing the Need for New Test Instances," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3007-3022, November.
    8. Liu, Haoxiang & Szeto, W.Y. & Long, Jiancheng, 2019. "Bike network design problem with a path-size logit-based equilibrium constraint: Formulation, global optimization, and matheuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 284-307.
    9. Krityakierne, Tipaluck & Baowan, Duangkamon, 2020. "Aggregated GP-based Optimization for Contaminant Source Localization," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    10. Richard T. Lyons & Richard C. Peralta & Partha Majumder, 2020. "Comparing Single-Objective Optimization Protocols for Calibrating the Birds Nest Aquifer Model—A Problem Having Multiple Local Optima," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-10, January.
    11. Duarte, Belmiro P.M. & Atkinson, Anthony C. & P. Singh, Satya & S. Reis, Marco, 2023. "Optimal design of experiments for hypothesis testing on ordered treatments via intersection-union tests," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115187, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Juliane Müller & Christine Shoemaker, 2014. "Influence of ensemble surrogate models and sampling strategy on the solution quality of algorithms for computationally expensive black-box global optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 123-144, October.
    13. Chen, Mingjie & Tompson, Andrew F.B. & Mellors, Robert J. & Abdalla, Osman, 2015. "An efficient optimization of well placement and control for a geothermal prospect under geological uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 352-363.
    14. Juliane Müller & Joshua D. Woodbury, 2017. "GOSAC: global optimization with surrogate approximation of constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 117-136, September.
    15. Belmiro P. M. Duarte & Anthony C. Atkinson & Satya P. Singh & Marco S. Reis, 2023. "Optimal design of experiments for hypothesis testing on ordered treatments via intersection-union tests," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 587-615, April.
    16. Wang, Ting & Li, Yao & Jia, Bin & Long, Jiancheng, 2024. "An autonomous vehicle exclusive lane design problem under the mixed autonomy traffic environment: Model formulation and large-scale algorithm design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    17. Charles Audet & Edward Hallé-Hannan & Sébastien Le Digabel, 2023. "A General Mathematical Framework for Constrained Mixed-variable Blackbox Optimization Problems with Meta and Categorical Variables," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-37, March.
    18. Siem, A.Y.D. & den Hertog, D., 2007. "Kriging Models That Are Robust With Respect to Simulation Errors," Other publications TiSEM fe73dc8b-20d6-4f50-95eb-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Hau T. Mai & Jaewook Lee & Joowon Kang & H. Nguyen-Xuan & Jaehong Lee, 2022. "An Improved Blind Kriging Surrogate Model for Design Optimization Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Regan, Amelia C., 2011. "Network-based real option models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 682-695, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:2448-:d:1087505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.