IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i3p1458-d1054641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of Tariffs on Energy Conscious Behavior with Respect to Household Attributes in Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Kh Md Nahiduzzaman

    (Life Cycle Management Laboratory, School of Engineering, University of British Columbia, 1137 Alumni Avenue, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

  • Abdullatif Said Abdallah

    (Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia)

  • Arash Moradzadeh

    (Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran)

  • Amin Mohammadpour Shotorbani

    (Life Cycle Management Laboratory, School of Engineering, University of British Columbia, 1137 Alumni Avenue, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

  • Kasun Hewage

    (Life Cycle Management Laboratory, School of Engineering, University of British Columbia, 1137 Alumni Avenue, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

  • Rehan Sadiq

    (Life Cycle Management Laboratory, School of Engineering, University of British Columbia, 1137 Alumni Avenue, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

Abstract

Historically, the combination of generous subsidies along with extreme climate has led to unsustainable domestic electricity consumption in Saudi Arabia. The residential sector constitutes a significant portion of this consumption. Amid the economic challenges, the country enforced a new electricity tariff for residential consumers in 2018. This study thus leverages change in 2018–2020 by collecting and analyzing the electricity consumption data of 73 households in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The energy consumption is modeled based on the households’ attributes (e.g., dwelling type, ownership, number of residents, rooms, ventilation type, etc.) and applied tariffs using a machine learning technique. The extreme learning machine (ELM) is employed in solving the overfitting problem due to low-volume data. The correlation matrix is also constructed to determine the relationship between the household attributes. The ELM model developed in this study extracts the correlation between the input variables in determining energy consumption and also predicts the energy consumption related to low consumption data. The findings indicated that the electricity consumption between the pre-revised tariff year and the revised tariff enforcement year saw a reduction which was consistent in the subsequent years. This was also validated by the paired sample t -test, which showed a significant decrease in electricity consumption for the study period. The analysis also revealed that several household attributes had a relatively high impact on the reduction in the electricity consumption level following the revised tariffs, whereas the majority of the attributes had a moderate impact. In addition to these key findings, the demonstrated pathway adopted in this study is itself a methodological contribution that provides critical information about the sensitivity of the impacts of tariffs on energy consumption with respect to different household attributes. Economic factors being the critical stress need to be blended with existing energy consciousness for positive changes in favor of energy-saving behavior of the household members. The study does not attempt to represent the population of concern, but demonstrates a methodology that would help unleash inherent energy consciousness in favor of sustainable and energy-efficient behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Kh Md Nahiduzzaman & Abdullatif Said Abdallah & Arash Moradzadeh & Amin Mohammadpour Shotorbani & Kasun Hewage & Rehan Sadiq, 2023. "Impacts of Tariffs on Energy Conscious Behavior with Respect to Household Attributes in Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1458-:d:1054641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Zhaohua & Zhang, Bin & Zhang, Yixiang, 2012. "Determinants of public acceptance of tiered electricity price reform in China: Evidence from four urban cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 235-244.
    2. Krarti, Moncef & Dubey, Kankana & Howarth, Nicholas, 2017. "Evaluation of building energy efficiency investment options for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 595-610.
    3. Azevedo, Isabel & Delarue, Erik & Meeus, Leonardo, 2013. "Mobilizing cities towards a low-carbon future: Tambourines, carrots and sticks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 894-900.
    4. Mohammad AlHashmi & Gyan Chhipi-Shrestha & Kh Md. Nahiduzzaman & Kasun Hewage & Rehan Sadiq, 2021. "Framework for Developing a Low-Carbon Energy Demand in Residential Buildings Using Community-Government Partnership: An Application in Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-36, August.
    5. Peter C. Reiss & Matthew W. White, 2008. "What changes energy consumption? Prices and public pressures," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 39(3), pages 636-663, September.
    6. Pothitou, Mary & Hanna, Richard F. & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J., 2016. "Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: An empirical study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1217-1229.
    7. Wu, Ya & Zhang, Li, 2017. "Evaluation of energy saving effects of tiered electricity pricing and investigation of the energy saving willingness of residents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 208-217.
    8. Anna Justyna Parzonko & Agata Balińska & Anna Sieczko, 2021. "Pro-Environmental Behaviors of Generation Z in the Context of the Concept of Homo Socio-Oeconomicus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Mohammad AlHashmi & Gyan Chhipi-Shrestha & Rajeev Ruparathna & Kh Md Nahiduzzaman & Kasun Hewage & Rehan Sadiq, 2021. "Energy Performance Assessment Framework for Residential Buildings in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Du, Gang & Lin, Wei & Sun, Chuanwang & Zhang, Dingzhong, 2015. "Residential electricity consumption after the reform of tiered pricing for household electricity in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 276-283.
    11. Liu, Che & Sun, Bo & Zhang, Chenghui & Li, Fan, 2020. "A hybrid prediction model for residential electricity consumption using holt-winters and extreme learning machine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    12. Arash Moradzadeh & Omid Sadeghian & Kazem Pourhossein & Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo & Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam, 2020. "Improving Residential Load Disaggregation for Sustainable Development of Energy via Principal Component Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    13. Fan Zhang, 2015. "Energy Price Reform and Household Welfare: The Case of Turkey," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alettin Irmak & Nurlan Kurmanov & Onaikhan Zhadigerova & Zukhra Turdiyeva & Aigul Bakirbekova & Gaukhar Saimagambetova & Assilbek Baidakov & Aigul Mukhamejanova & Madina Tolysbayeva & Sagyngali Seitzh, 2023. "Shaping Energy-Saving Behavior in Education System: A Systematic Review," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 46-60, July.
    2. Lia Marchi & Jacopo Gaspari, 2023. "Energy Conservation at Home: A Critical Review on the Role of End-User Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zhaohua & Sun, Yefei & Wang, Bo, 2020. "Policy cognition is more effective than step tariff in promoting electricity saving behaviour of residents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Wu, Ya & Zhang, Li, 2017. "Evaluation of energy saving effects of tiered electricity pricing and investigation of the energy saving willingness of residents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 208-217.
    3. Sania Malik, 2021. "Residential Electricity Consumers and Increasing Block Pricing Policy in Pakistan: Evidence Based on Household Level Primary Data," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 3(2), pages 80-87.
    4. Kuang, Yunming & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "Performance of tiered pricing policy for residential natural gas in China: Does the income effect matter?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    5. Chunhong Sheng & Yun Cao & Bing Xue, 2018. "Residential Energy Sustainability in China and Germany: The Impact of National Energy Policy System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Christophe Muller & Huijie Yan, 2018. "Household Fuel Use in Rural China," AMSE Working Papers 1808, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    7. Li, Yao & Fan, Jin & Zhao, Dingtao & Wu, Yanrui & Li, Jun, 2016. "Tiered gasoline pricing: A personal carbon trading perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 194-201.
    8. Lin, Boqiang & Zhu, Penghu, 2021. "Has increasing block pricing policy been perceived in China? Evidence from residential electricity use," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Yang, Changhui & Meng, Chen & Zhou, Kaile, 2018. "Residential electricity pricing in China: The context of price-based demand response," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2870-2878.
    10. Athukorala, Wasantha & Wilson, Clevo & Managi, Shunsuke & Karunarathna, Muditha, 2019. "Household demand for electricity: The role of market distortions and prices in competition policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Zihan Zhang & Enping Li & Guowei Zhang, 2023. "How Efficient China’s Tiered Pricing Is for Household Electricity: Evidence from Survey Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Wang, Chen & Zhou, Kaile & Yang, Shanlin, 2017. "A review of residential tiered electricity pricing in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 533-543.
    13. Mohammad AlHashmi & Gyan Chhipi-Shrestha & Kh Md. Nahiduzzaman & Kasun Hewage & Rehan Sadiq, 2021. "Framework for Developing a Low-Carbon Energy Demand in Residential Buildings Using Community-Government Partnership: An Application in Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-36, August.
    14. Wang, Xiaolei & Wei, Chunxin & Wang, Yanhua, 2022. "Does the current tiered electricity pricing structure still restrain electricity consumption in China's residential sector?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    15. Sun, Mei & Li, Juan & Gao, Cuixia & Han, Dun, 2017. "Identifying regime shifts in the US electricity market based on price fluctuations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 658-666.
    16. Ayertey, Winfred & Sharifi, Ayyoob & Yoshida, Yuichiro, 2024. "The impact of increase in block pricing on electricity demand responsiveness: Evidence from Ghana," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    17. Mi, Lingyun & Xu, Ting & Sun, Yuhuan & Yang, Hang & Wang, Bangjun & Gan, Xiaoli & Qiao, Lijie, 2021. "Promoting differentiated energy savings: Analysis of the psychological motivation of households with different energy consumption levels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    18. Zhang, Chonghui & Bai, Chen & Su, Weihua & Balezentis, Tomas, 2024. "The centralised data envelopment analysis model integrated with cost information and utility theory for power price setting under carbon peak strategy at the firm-level," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    19. Liu, Chang & Lin, Boqiang, 2020. "Is increasing-block electricity pricing effectively carried out in China? A case study in Shanghai and Shenzhen," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Anthony Amoah & Thomas Addoah, 2021. "Does environmental knowledge drive pro-environmental behaviour in developing countries? Evidence from households in Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 2719-2738, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1458-:d:1054641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.