IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i3p1121-d1041346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time Domain Source Parameter Estimation of Natural and Man-Induced Microearthquakes at the Geysers Geothermal Field

Author

Listed:
  • Valeria Longobardi

    (Department of Physics “E. Pancini”, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80126 Naples, Italy)

  • Sahar Nazeri

    (Department of Physics “E. Pancini”, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80126 Naples, Italy)

  • Simona Colombelli

    (Department of Physics “E. Pancini”, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80126 Naples, Italy)

  • Raffaele Rea

    (Department of Physics “E. Pancini”, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80126 Naples, Italy)

  • Grazia De Landro

    (Department of Physics “E. Pancini”, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80126 Naples, Italy)

  • Aldo Zollo

    (Department of Physics “E. Pancini”, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80126 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

Water injection in geothermal areas is the preferential strategy to sustain the natural production of geothermal resources. In this context, monitoring microearthquakes is a fundamental tool to track changes in the reservoirs in terms of soil composition, response to injections, and resource exploitation with space and time. Therefore, refined source characterization is crucial to better estimate the size, source mechanism, and rupture process of microearthquakes, as they are possibly related to industrial activities, and to identify any potential variation in the background seismicity. Standard approaches for source parameter estimation are ordinarily based on the modelling of Fourier displacement spectra and its characteristic parameters: the low-frequency spectral level and corner frequency. Here, we apply an innovative time domain technique that uses the curves of P-wave amplitude vs. time along the seismogram. This methodology allows estimation of seismic moment, source radius, and stress release from the plateau level and the corner time of the average logarithm of P-wave displacement versus time with the assumption of a triangular moment rate function, uniform rupture speed, and a constant/frequency-independent Q-factor. In the current paper, this time domain methodology is implemented on a selected catalog of microearthquakes consisting of 83 events with a moment magnitude ranging between 1.0 and 1.5 that occurred during a 7-year period (2007–2014) of fluid extraction/injection around Prati-9 and Prati-29 wells at The Geysers geothermal field. The results show that the time domain technique provides accurate seismic moment (moment magnitude) and rupture duration/radius estimates of microearthquakes down to the explored limit (M 1) while accounting for the anelastic attenuation effect in the radiated high-frequency wavefield. The retrieved source radius vs. moment scaling is consistent with a self-similar, constant stress drop scaling model, which proves an appropriate attenuation correction and the validity of the assumed, triangular moment rate function for microearthquake ruptures. Two alternative mechanical models are proposed to explain the observed difference (about two orders of magnitude) in the retrieved average stress release estimates between the time and frequency domain methods. We argue that the two quantities may not refer to the same physical quantity representing the stress release of earthquake ruptures. Either the smaller stress release values from the time domain method may indicate a larger fracture area (by a factor of 20) radiating the observed P-waveforms than the one estimated from the corner frequencies, or the frequency domain estimate is a proxy for dynamic stress release while the time domain is more representative of the static release. The latter is associated with a much lower dynamic friction value than static friction value at the fault during the rupture process.

Suggested Citation

  • Valeria Longobardi & Sahar Nazeri & Simona Colombelli & Raffaele Rea & Grazia De Landro & Aldo Zollo, 2023. "Time Domain Source Parameter Estimation of Natural and Man-Induced Microearthquakes at the Geysers Geothermal Field," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1121-:d:1041346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1121/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaucher, Emmanuel & Schoenball, Martin & Heidbach, Oliver & Zang, Arno & Fokker, Peter A. & van Wees, Jan-Diederik & Kohl, Thomas, 2015. "Induced seismicity in geothermal reservoirs: A review of forecasting approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1473-1490.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kang, Fangchao & Jia, Tianrang & Li, Yingchun & Deng, Jianhui & Tang, Chun'an & Huang, Xin, 2021. "Experimental study on the physical and mechanical variations of hot granite under different cooling treatments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1316-1328.
    2. Esmaeilpour, Morteza & Gholami Korzani, Maziar & Kohl, Thomas, 2023. "Stochastic performance assessment on long-term behavior of multilateral closed deep geothermal systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 26-35.
    3. Sandro Andrés & David Santillán & Juan Carlos Mosquera & Luis Cueto-Felgueroso, 2019. "Thermo-Poroelastic Analysis of Induced Seismicity at the Basel Enhanced Geothermal System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Falcone, Gioia & Liu, Xiaolei & Okech, Roy Radido & Seyidov, Ferid & Teodoriu, Catalin, 2018. "Assessment of deep geothermal energy exploitation methods: The need for novel single-well solutions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 54-63.
    5. Elżbieta Węglińska & Andrzej Leśniak, 2021. "Induced Seismicity and Detailed Fracture Mapping as Tools for Evaluating HDR Reservoir Volume," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Anderson, Austin & Rezaie, Behnaz, 2019. "Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 18-34.
    7. Soltani, M. & Moradi Kashkooli, Farshad & Souri, Mohammad & Rafiei, Behnam & Jabarifar, Mohammad & Gharali, Kobra & Nathwani, Jatin S., 2021. "Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    8. Lu, Shyi-Min, 2018. "A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2902-2921.
    9. Diego Paltrinieri & Paolo Favali & Francesco Italiano & Patrizio Signanini & Carlo Caso & Fabrizio B. Armani, 2022. "The Marsili Seamount Offshore Geothermal Reservoir: A Big Challenge for an Energy Transition Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Pan, Shu-Yuan & Gao, Mengyao & Shah, Kinjal J. & Zheng, Jianming & Pei, Si-Lu & Chiang, Pen-Chi, 2019. "Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: Barriers and strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 19-32.
    11. Prabhav Borate & Jacques Rivière & Chris Marone & Ankur Mali & Daniel Kifer & Parisa Shokouhi, 2023. "Using a physics-informed neural network and fault zone acoustic monitoring to predict lab earthquakes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Miguel Angel Marazuela & Alejandro García-Gil, 2022. "Frontier Research of Engineering: Geothermal Energy Utilization and Groundwater Heat Pump Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-3, October.
    13. Moraga, J. & Duzgun, H.S. & Cavur, M. & Soydan, H., 2022. "The Geothermal Artificial Intelligence for geothermal exploration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 134-149.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1121-:d:1041346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.