IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i2p883-d1033737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intelligent Identification Method for Drilling Conditions Based on Stacking Model Fusion

Author

Listed:
  • Yonghai Gao

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
    National Engineering Research Center for Oil & Gas Drilling and Completion Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Xin Yu

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Yufa Su

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
    Xinhua Three Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310052, China)

  • Zhiming Yin

    (China National Offshore Oil Corporation Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China)

  • Xuerui Wang

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Shaoqiang Li

    (School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

Abstract

Due to the complex and changing drilling conditions and the large scale of logging data, it is extremely difficult to process the data in real time and identify dangerous working conditions. Based on the multi-classification intelligent algorithm of Stacking model fusion, the 24 h actual working conditions of an XX well are classified and identified. The drilling conditions are divided into standpipe connection, tripping out, tripping in, Reaming, back Reaming, circulation, drilling, and other conditions. In the Stacking fusion model, the accuracy of the integrated model and the base learner is compared, and the confusion matrix of the drilling multi-condition recognition results is output, which verifies the effectiveness of the Stacking model fusion. Based on the variation in the parameter characteristics of different working conditions, a real-time working condition recognition diagram of the classification results is drawn, and the adaptation rules of the Stacking fusion model under different working conditions are summarized. The stacking model fusion method has a good recognition effect under the standpipe connection condition, tripping in condition, and drilling condition. These three conditions’ accuracy, recall rate, and F1 value are all above 90%. The stacking model fusion method has a relatively poor recognition effect on ‘other conditions‘, and the accuracy rate, recall rate, and F1 value reach less than 80%.

Suggested Citation

  • Yonghai Gao & Xin Yu & Yufa Su & Zhiming Yin & Xuerui Wang & Shaoqiang Li, 2023. "Intelligent Identification Method for Drilling Conditions Based on Stacking Model Fusion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:883-:d:1033737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/2/883/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/2/883/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed E. Radwan, 2022. "Drilling in Complex Pore Pressure Regimes: Analysis of Wellbore Stability Applying the Depth of Failure Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Islam, Rakibul & Khan, Faisal & Venkatesan, Ramchandran, 2017. "Real time risk analysis of kick detection: Testing and validation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 25-37.
    3. Yulai Zhao & Zhiqiang Huang & Fubin Xin & Guilin Qi & Hao Huang, 2022. "Kick Prediction Method Based on Artificial Neural Network Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-11, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Rui & Zhu, Jingyu & Chen, Guoming & Tian, Zhigang, 2022. "A real-time probabilistic risk assessment method for the petrochemical industry based on data monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Liu, Zengkai & Ma, Qiang & Cai, Baoping & Shi, Xuewei & Zheng, Chao & Liu, Yonghong, 2022. "Risk coupling analysis of subsea blowout accidents based on dynamic Bayesian network and NK model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    3. Yujin Jeong & Hyejin Jang & Byungun Yoon, 2021. "Developing a risk-adaptive technology roadmap using a Bayesian network and topic modeling under deep uncertainty," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 3697-3722, May.
    4. Rafik Baouche & Souvik Sen & Ahmed E. Radwan & Ahmed Abd El Aal, 2023. "In Situ Stress Determination Based on Acoustic Image Logs and Borehole Measurements in the In-Adaoui and Bourarhat Hydrocarbon Fields, Eastern Algeria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Zheng, Xiaohu & Yao, Wen & Xu, Yingchun & Chen, Xianqi, 2019. "Improved compression inference algorithm for reliability analysis of complex multistate satellite system based on multilevel Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 123-142.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:883-:d:1033737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.