IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i22p7602-d1281309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of an Improved Decision Support Tool for Geothermal Site Selection in Nigeria Based on Comprehensive Criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Uchechukwu Nwaiwu

    (Centre for Environment and Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

  • Matthew Leach

    (Centre for Environment and Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

  • Lirong Liu

    (Centre for Environment and Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

Abstract

Geothermal resource assessment is crucial for the rural electrification of Nigeria. A comprehensive set of criteria was used to appraise promising geothermal sites in Nigeria. The evaluation of the sites was performed using the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method and taking into account evidence of a wide range of criteria from a set of geological, geophysical, well log, environmental, remote sensing, and geochemical datasets to appraise promising geothermal sites and to add to the current debate on the needed criteria for geothermal development. To gather relevant data, various sources such as bottom-hole temperature (BHT) data from different boreholes and oil and gas wells, aeromagnetic maps, reduced-to-the-pole, magnetic, heat flow, seismic, and geothermal gradient data from aerogravity maps, Bouguer anomaly maps, earthquake epicenter maps, satellite images, and geological maps were obtained from the literature. A case study of the thirty-six states of Nigeria, including the federal capital territory, Abuja (FCT), was conducted to illustrate how these criteria would reveal the technical aspect of the geothermal energy situation. A model was developed to show that the application of a wide range of criteria to the six datasets identified and analyzed in this study reveals that the datasets complement each other and should not be used independently. It can be found from the overall suitability map that more than 20% of the study area is suitable for geothermal energy development. It can also be observed from the map that some of the promising sites in Nigeria may include but are not limited to Bauchi, FCT, Taraba, Ebonyi, Adamawa, Oyo, and Nasarawa states in Nigeria. The opportunities for the further application of the approach are discussed, including the use of the model to help policymakers decide where to invest in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Uchechukwu Nwaiwu & Matthew Leach & Lirong Liu, 2023. "Development of an Improved Decision Support Tool for Geothermal Site Selection in Nigeria Based on Comprehensive Criteria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-28, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7602-:d:1281309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7602/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7602/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. María Yetano Roche & Hans Verolme & Chibuikem Agbaegbu & Taylor Binnington & Manfred Fischedick & Emmanuel Olukayode Oladipo, 2020. "Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Nigeria’s power sector: assessment of transition pathways," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 846-865, July.
    2. Schiel, Kerry & Baume, Olivier & Caruso, Geoffrey & Leopold, Ulrich, 2016. "GIS-based modelling of shallow geothermal energy potential for CO2 emission mitigation in urban areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1023-1036.
    3. Katherin George Golitzen & Inger Andersen & Ousmane Dione & Martha Jarosewich-Holder, 2005. "The Niger River Basin: A Vision for Sustainable Management," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7397.
    4. Azizi, Saeid & Shakibi, Hamid & Shokri, Afshar & Chitsaz, Ata & Yari, Mortaza, 2023. "Multi-aspect analysis and RSM-based optimization of a novel dual-source electricity and cooling cogeneration system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    5. Procesi, M. & Cantucci, B. & Buttinelli, M. & Armezzani, G. & Quattrocchi, F. & Boschi, E., 2013. "Strategic use of the underground in an energy mix plan: Synergies among CO2, CH4 geological storage and geothermal energy. Latium Region case study (Central Italy)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 104-131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cassina, Lisa & Laloui, Lyesse & Rotta Loria, Alessandro F., 2022. "Thermal interactions among vertical geothermal borehole fields," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1204-1220.
    2. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2015. "A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 365-377.
    3. Lv, Xuefei & Lv, Ying & Zhu, Yiping, 2023. "Multi-variable study and MOPSO-based multi-objective optimization of a novel cogeneration plant using biomass fuel and geothermal energy: A complementary hybrid design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Zakari Mounir & Chuan Ma & Issoufou Amadou, 2011. "Application of Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP): A Model to Assess Future Water Demands in the Niger River (In Niger Republic)," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(1), pages 1-38, February.
    5. Chang, Yue & Jia, Yulong & Hong, Tan, 2023. "Comprehensive analysis and multi-objective optimization of an innovative power generation system using biomass gasification and LNG regasification processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    6. Malin Falkenmark & Charlotte de Fraiture & Margaret J. Vick, 2009. "Global change in four semi‐arid transnational river basins: Analysis of institutional water sharing preparedness," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 33(4), pages 310-319, November.
    7. Cui, Guodong & Zhang, Liang & Ren, Bo & Enechukwu, Chioma & Liu, Yanmin & Ren, Shaoran, 2016. "Geothermal exploitation from depleted high temperature gas reservoirs via recycling supercritical CO2: Heat mining rate and salt precipitation effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 837-852.
    8. Chen, Ying & Liu, Yuxuan & Nam, Eun-Young & Zhang, Yang & Dahlak, Aida, 2023. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of an integrated double-flash-binary geothermal system and dual-pressure ORC using zeotropic mixtures; multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    9. Zhang, Liang & Ezekiel, Justin & Li, Dexiang & Pei, Jingjing & Ren, Shaoran, 2014. "Potential assessment of CO2 injection for heat mining and geological storage in geothermal reservoirs of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 237-246.
    10. Peng Yu & Yufeng Xu & Honghua Liu & Xinyu Liu & Jiani Fu & Meijun Xu & Dankun Zhou, 2024. "Regional-Scale Assessment of the Potential for Shallow Geothermal Energy Development Using Vertical Ground Source Heat Pumps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Monia Procesi, 2014. "Geothermal Potential Evaluation for Northern Chile and Suggestions for New Energy Plans," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Epting, Jannis & Böttcher, Fabian & Mueller, Matthias H. & García-Gil, Alejandro & Zosseder, Kai & Huggenberger, Peter, 2020. "City-scale solutions for the energy use of shallow urban subsurface resources – Bridging the gap between theoretical and technical potentials," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 751-763.
    13. Ekpo, C.G. & Haruna, I. O., 2022. "Poverty and Environmental Sustainability: A Case Study of Gwagwalada Area Council, FCT, Abuja," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(11), pages 432-438, November.
    14. Dou, Zhenhai & Zou, Yunhe & Mohebbi, Amir, 2024. "Design and multi-aspect analysis of a geothermal and biomass dual-source power, cooling, heating, and hybrid freshwater production system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    15. Ziabakhsh-Ganji, Zaman & Kooi, Henk, 2014. "Sensitivity of Joule–Thomson cooling to impure CO2 injection in depleted gas reservoirs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 434-451.
    16. Sachs, Julia & Moya, Diego & Giarola, Sara & Hawkes, Adam, 2019. "Clustered spatially and temporally resolved global heat and cooling energy demand in the residential sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 48-62.
    17. Hou, Rui & Zhang, Nachuan & Yang, Chengsheng & Zhao, Jing & Li, Peng & Sun, Bo, 2023. "A novel structure of natural gas, electricity, and methanol production using a combined reforming cycle: Integration of biogas upgrading, liquefied natural gas re-gasification, power plant, and methan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    18. Melikoglu, Mehmet, 2017. "Geothermal energy in Turkey and around the World: A review of the literature and an analysis based on Turkey's Vision 2023 energy targets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 485-492.
    19. Zhou, Xiao & Cai, Yangchao & Li, Xuetao, 2024. "Process arrangement and multi-aspect study of a novel environmentally-friendly multigeneration plant relying on a geothermal-based plant combined with the goswami cycle booted by kalina and desalinati," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    20. Cheng, Wen-Long & Li, Tong-Tong & Nian, Yong-Le & Xie, Kun, 2014. "Evaluation of working fluids for geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 238-245.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7602-:d:1281309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.