IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i22p7602-d1281309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of an Improved Decision Support Tool for Geothermal Site Selection in Nigeria Based on Comprehensive Criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Uchechukwu Nwaiwu

    (Centre for Environment and Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

  • Matthew Leach

    (Centre for Environment and Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

  • Lirong Liu

    (Centre for Environment and Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

Abstract

Geothermal resource assessment is crucial for the rural electrification of Nigeria. A comprehensive set of criteria was used to appraise promising geothermal sites in Nigeria. The evaluation of the sites was performed using the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method and taking into account evidence of a wide range of criteria from a set of geological, geophysical, well log, environmental, remote sensing, and geochemical datasets to appraise promising geothermal sites and to add to the current debate on the needed criteria for geothermal development. To gather relevant data, various sources such as bottom-hole temperature (BHT) data from different boreholes and oil and gas wells, aeromagnetic maps, reduced-to-the-pole, magnetic, heat flow, seismic, and geothermal gradient data from aerogravity maps, Bouguer anomaly maps, earthquake epicenter maps, satellite images, and geological maps were obtained from the literature. A case study of the thirty-six states of Nigeria, including the federal capital territory, Abuja (FCT), was conducted to illustrate how these criteria would reveal the technical aspect of the geothermal energy situation. A model was developed to show that the application of a wide range of criteria to the six datasets identified and analyzed in this study reveals that the datasets complement each other and should not be used independently. It can be found from the overall suitability map that more than 20% of the study area is suitable for geothermal energy development. It can also be observed from the map that some of the promising sites in Nigeria may include but are not limited to Bauchi, FCT, Taraba, Ebonyi, Adamawa, Oyo, and Nasarawa states in Nigeria. The opportunities for the further application of the approach are discussed, including the use of the model to help policymakers decide where to invest in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Uchechukwu Nwaiwu & Matthew Leach & Lirong Liu, 2023. "Development of an Improved Decision Support Tool for Geothermal Site Selection in Nigeria Based on Comprehensive Criteria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-28, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7602-:d:1281309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7602/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7602/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherin George Golitzen & Inger Andersen & Ousmane Dione & Martha Jarosewich-Holder, 2005. "The Niger River Basin: A Vision for Sustainable Management," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7397.
    2. María Yetano Roche & Hans Verolme & Chibuikem Agbaegbu & Taylor Binnington & Manfred Fischedick & Emmanuel Olukayode Oladipo, 2020. "Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Nigeria’s power sector: assessment of transition pathways," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 846-865, July.
    3. Azizi, Saeid & Shakibi, Hamid & Shokri, Afshar & Chitsaz, Ata & Yari, Mortaza, 2023. "Multi-aspect analysis and RSM-based optimization of a novel dual-source electricity and cooling cogeneration system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    4. Schiel, Kerry & Baume, Olivier & Caruso, Geoffrey & Leopold, Ulrich, 2016. "GIS-based modelling of shallow geothermal energy potential for CO2 emission mitigation in urban areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1023-1036.
    5. Procesi, M. & Cantucci, B. & Buttinelli, M. & Armezzani, G. & Quattrocchi, F. & Boschi, E., 2013. "Strategic use of the underground in an energy mix plan: Synergies among CO2, CH4 geological storage and geothermal energy. Latium Region case study (Central Italy)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 104-131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cassina, Lisa & Laloui, Lyesse & Rotta Loria, Alessandro F., 2022. "Thermal interactions among vertical geothermal borehole fields," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1204-1220.
    2. Zhang, Liang & Ezekiel, Justin & Li, Dexiang & Pei, Jingjing & Ren, Shaoran, 2014. "Potential assessment of CO2 injection for heat mining and geological storage in geothermal reservoirs of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 237-246.
    3. Peng Yu & Yufeng Xu & Honghua Liu & Xinyu Liu & Jiani Fu & Meijun Xu & Dankun Zhou, 2024. "Regional-Scale Assessment of the Potential for Shallow Geothermal Energy Development Using Vertical Ground Source Heat Pumps," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Monia Procesi, 2014. "Geothermal Potential Evaluation for Northern Chile and Suggestions for New Energy Plans," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Epting, Jannis & Böttcher, Fabian & Mueller, Matthias H. & García-Gil, Alejandro & Zosseder, Kai & Huggenberger, Peter, 2020. "City-scale solutions for the energy use of shallow urban subsurface resources – Bridging the gap between theoretical and technical potentials," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 751-763.
    6. Ekpo, C.G. & Haruna, I. O., 2022. "Poverty and Environmental Sustainability: A Case Study of Gwagwalada Area Council, FCT, Abuja," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(11), pages 432-438, November.
    7. Hou, Rui & Zhang, Nachuan & Yang, Chengsheng & Zhao, Jing & Li, Peng & Sun, Bo, 2023. "A novel structure of natural gas, electricity, and methanol production using a combined reforming cycle: Integration of biogas upgrading, liquefied natural gas re-gasification, power plant, and methan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    8. Zhao, Lu & Hai, Qing & Mei, Junlun, 2024. "An integrated approach to green power, cooling, and freshwater production from geothermal and solar energy sources; case study of Jiangsu, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    9. Zhou, Xiao & Cai, Yangchao & Li, Xuetao, 2024. "Process arrangement and multi-aspect study of a novel environmentally-friendly multigeneration plant relying on a geothermal-based plant combined with the goswami cycle booted by kalina and desalinati," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    10. Cheng, Wen-Long & Li, Tong-Tong & Nian, Yong-Le & Xie, Kun, 2014. "Evaluation of working fluids for geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 238-245.
    11. Böttcher, Fabian & Casasso, Alessandro & Götzl, Gregor & Zosseder, Kai, 2019. "TAP - Thermal aquifer Potential: A quantitative method to assess the spatial potential for the thermal use of groundwater," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 85-95.
    12. Castaldo, Veronica Lucia & Pisello, Anna Laura & Piselli, Cristina & Fabiani, Claudia & Cotana, Franco & Santamouris, Mattheos, 2018. "How outdoor microclimate mitigation affects building thermal-energy performance: A new design-stage method for energy saving in residential near-zero energy settlements in Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 920-935.
    13. Cheng Cao & Hejuan Liu & Zhengmeng Hou & Faisal Mehmood & Jianxing Liao & Wentao Feng, 2020. "A Review of CO 2 Storage in View of Safety and Cost-Effectiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-45, January.
    14. Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P. & Efthymiou, Loukia & Michopoulos, Apostolos & Mavragani, Amaryllis & Anđelković, Aleksandar S. & Antolini, Francesco & Bacic, Mario & Bajare, Diana & Baralis, Matteo & Bog, 2020. "A review of the legal framework in shallow geothermal energy in selected European countries: Need for guidelines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P2), pages 2556-2571.
    15. Stegnar, Gašper & Staničić, D. & Česen, M. & Čižman, J. & Pestotnik, S. & Prestor, J. & Urbančič, A. & Merše, S., 2019. "A framework for assessing the technical and economic potential of shallow geothermal energy in individual and district heating systems: A case study of Slovenia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 405-420.
    16. Erika Buday-Bódi & Ali Irfan & Richard William McIntosh & Zsolt Zoltán Fehér & József Csajbók & Csaba Juhász & László Radócz & Arnold Szilágyi & Tamás Buday, 2022. "Subregion-Scale Geothermal Delineation Based on Image Analysis Using Reflection Seismology and Well Data with an Outlook for Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Nemati Mofarrah, Ali & Jalalvand, Meysam & Abdolmaleki, Abbas, 2023. "Design, multi-aspect analyses, and multi-objective optimization of a biomass/geothermal-based cogeneration of power and freshwater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    18. Halilovic, Smajil & Böttcher, Fabian & Zosseder, Kai & Hamacher, Thomas, 2024. "Spatial analysis of thermal groundwater use based on optimal sizing and placement of well doublets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    19. Antonio Barragán-Escandón & Julio Terrados-Cepeda & Esteban Zalamea-León, 2017. "The Role of Renewable Energy in the Promotion of Circular Urban Metabolism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-29, December.
    20. Zhu, Chaoyang & Wang, Mengxia & Guo, Mengxing & Deng, Jinxin & Du, Qipei & Wei, Wei & Zhang, Yunxiang & Mohebbi, Amir, 2024. "An innovative process design and multi-criteria study/optimization of a biomass digestion-supercritical carbon dioxide scenario toward boosting a geothermal-driven cogeneration system for power and he," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7602-:d:1281309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.