IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i21p7410-d1273246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewable Cooperation Mechanisms in the EU: Lessons Learned and Future Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Romana Tedeschini

    (Joanneum Research, LIFE—Institute for Climate, Energy Systems and Society, Waagner-Biro-Straße 100, 8020 Graz, Austria)

  • Andreas Tuerk

    (Joanneum Research, LIFE—Institute for Climate, Energy Systems and Society, Waagner-Biro-Straße 100, 8020 Graz, Austria)

  • Dorian Frieden

    (Zukunft–Umwelt–Gesellschaft (ZUG) gGmbH, Stresemannstr. 69–71, 10963 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

In 2018, the European Union (EU) adopted a recast of the Renewable Energy Directive (RED), setting the framework for a common EU-wide 2030 target of 32.5% renewables in final energy consumption, for which Member States shall set national contributions. To address the disparities in national targets, the EU introduced three cooperation mechanisms: statistical transfers, joint support schemes, and joint projects. This paper provides an assessment of the utilization of cooperation mechanisms by Member States to meet the 2020 renewable energy target, offering recommendations for the RED III implementation. It analyzes the motivations of both buyer and seller countries, examines the patterns observed in concluded agreements, and interprets the dynamics of the market. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, incorporating a literature review, analysis of official statistics and cooperation agreements, and interviews with government representatives involved in implementing these mechanisms. The study reveals areas for improvement and raises questions about the efficacy of the instruments and their alternatives. To enhance the effectiveness of renewable cooperation mechanisms, a more systemic approach is necessary. The proposed new financing mechanism can ensure certainty in financial allocation and support larger joint projects of European significance. Furthermore, it is anticipated that statistical transfers will continue to be utilized due to established bilateral relationships and the need for last-minute adjustments to achieve renewable energy targets. This research provides valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders in advancing renewable cooperation mechanisms and driving the EU’s progress towards a climate-neutral continent by 2050.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Romana Tedeschini & Andreas Tuerk & Dorian Frieden, 2023. "Renewable Cooperation Mechanisms in the EU: Lessons Learned and Future Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:21:p:7410-:d:1273246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/21/7410/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/21/7410/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amundsen, Eirik S. & Bergman, Lars, 2006. "Why has the Nordic electricity market worked so well?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 148-157, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lyu, Chenyan & Do, Hung Xuan & Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2024. "Volatility spillovers and carbon price in the Nordic wholesale electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Söderholm, Patrik & Wårell, Linda, 2011. "Market opening and third party access in district heating networks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 742-752, February.
    3. Jesús Alonso Botero & John Jairo García & Luis Guillermo Vélez, 2013. "Mecanismos utilizados para monitorear el poder de mercado en mercados eléctricos: reflexiones para Colombia," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, December.
    4. Vesterberg, Mattias, 2017. "Power to the people: Electricity demand and household behavior," Umeå Economic Studies 942, Umeå University, Department of Economics.
    5. Frowin Schulz & Karl Mosler, 2011. "The effect of infrequent trading on detecting price jumps," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 95(1), pages 27-58, March.
    6. Mauritzen, Johannes, 2012. "Dead Battery? Wind Power, the Spot Market, and Hydro Power Interaction in the Nordic Electricity Market," Working Paper Series 908, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    7. Faisal Mehmood Mirza & Olvar Bergland, 2016. "Market Power in the Norwegian Electricity Market: Are the Transmission Bottlenecks Truly Exogenous?," The Energy Journal, , vol. 37(2), pages 27-44, April.
    8. Sandsmark, Maria, 2009. "A regional energy paradox--the case of Central Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4549-4556, November.
    9. Farzad Hassanzadeh Moghimi & Hanna Ek Fälth & Lina Reichenberg & Afzal S. Siddiqui, 2023. "Climate Policy and Strategic Operations in a Hydro-Thermal Power System," The Energy Journal, , vol. 44(5), pages 67-94, September.
    10. Matti Liski & Iivo Vehviläinen, 2016. "Gone with the Wind? An Empirical Analysis of the Renewable Energy Rent Transfer," CESifo Working Paper Series 6250, CESifo.
    11. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19124 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2010. "Electricity Market Reform: Lessons for developing countries," MPRA Paper 27317, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Vahid Arabzadeh & Peter D. Lund, 2020. "Effect of Heat Demand on Integration of Urban Large-Scale Renewable Schemes—Case of Helsinki City (60 °N)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Richard Meade & Seini O’Connor, 2011. "Comparison of Long-term Contracts and Vertical Integration in Decentralized Electricity Markets," Chapters, in: Jean-Michel Glachant & Dominique Finon & Adrien de Hauteclocque (ed.), Competition, Contracts and Electricity Markets, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Nils-Henrik M. von der Fehr & Petter Vegard Hansen, 2010. "Electricity Retailing in Norway," The Energy Journal, , vol. 31(1), pages 25-46, January.
    16. Oseni, Musiliu O. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2014. "Institutional arrangements for the promotion of regional integration of electricity markets : international experience," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6947, The World Bank.
    17. Mikael Bask & Jens Lundgren & Niklas Rudholm, 2009. "Market power in the expanding Nordic power market," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(9), pages 1035-1043.
    18. Ek, Kristina & Söderholm, Patrik, 2008. "Households' switching behavior between electricity suppliers in Sweden," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 254-261, December.
    19. Mari Makkonen, Mats Nilsson and Satu Viljainen, 2015. "All quiet on the western front? Transmission capacity development in the Nordic electricity market," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    20. Mauritzen, Johannes, 2011. "What Happens When it's Windy in Denmark? An Empirical Analysis of Wind Power on Price Variability in the Nordic Electricity Market," Working Paper Series 889, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    21. Do, Hung Xuan & Nepal, Rabindra & Pham, Son Duy & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2024. "Electricity market crisis in Europe and cross border price effects: A quantile return connectedness analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:21:p:7410-:d:1273246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.