IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i15p5616-d1202707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geospatial Analysis of Scour in Offshore Wind Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Clara Matutano Molina

    (Grupo de Investigación ARIES, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, C. de Sta. Cruz de Marcenado, 27, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

  • Christian Velasco-Gallego

    (Grupo de Investigación ARIES, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, C. de Sta. Cruz de Marcenado, 27, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

  • Nerea Portillo-Juan

    (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Campus Ciudad Universitaria, Calle del Profesor Aranguren 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Vicente Negro Valdecantos

    (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Campus Ciudad Universitaria, Calle del Profesor Aranguren 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Nieves Cubo-Mateo

    (Grupo de Investigación ARIES, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, C. de Sta. Cruz de Marcenado, 27, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Climate change has highlighted the need to promote renewable energies. The offshore wind industry is growing exponentially because of some political strategies supported by various organizations, such as the European Union. The implementation of these strategies is commonly associated with significant investments, public acceptance, or achieving better installations and greater cumulative capacities. To ensure that offshore renewable energy projects could reach their ambitious targets, this study promotes the implementation of political strategies or planning decisions using data mining techniques and analytical tools. Strategic decisions based on real data analysis could help to achieve more suitable and optimal infrastructures. The scour phenomenon jeopardizes the operability of offshore wind farms, making it necessary to study its evolution over the years. In this work, extensive research on the scour phenomenon in offshore wind farms using real data (from the Lynn and Inner Dowsing offshore wind farms located in the UK) was performed, which revealed an evident lack of consideration of this phenomenon for data-driven decision-making processes. As a novelty, this research develops a detailed geospatial analysis of data, studying the possible autocorrelation of scour data measured from each turbine between 2011 and 2015. The conclusions obtained could be used to improve future planning tasks in offshore wind farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Clara Matutano Molina & Christian Velasco-Gallego & Nerea Portillo-Juan & Vicente Negro Valdecantos & Nieves Cubo-Mateo, 2023. "Geospatial Analysis of Scour in Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:15:p:5616-:d:1202707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/15/5616/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/15/5616/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richmond, M. & Sobey, A. & Pandit, R. & Kolios, A., 2020. "Stochastic assessment of aerodynamics within offshore wind farms based on machine-learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 650-661.
    2. Hugo Díaz & C. Guedes Soares, 2022. "Multicriteria Decision Approach to the Design of Floating Wind Farm Export Cables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Carlos Emilio Arboleda Chavez & Vasiliki Stratigaki & Minghao Wu & Peter Troch & Alexander Schendel & Mario Welzel & Raúl Villanueva & Torsten Schlurmann & Leen De Vos & Dogan Kisacik & Francisco Tave, 2019. "Large-Scale Experiments to Improve Monopile Scour Protection Design Adapted to Climate Change—The PROTEUS Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, May.
    4. Matutano, Clara & Negro, Vicente & López-Gutiérrez, Jose-Santos & Esteban, M. Dolores, 2013. "Scour prediction and scour protections in offshore wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 358-365.
    5. Yin, Xiuxing & Zhang, Wencan & Jiang, Zhansi & Pan, Li, 2020. "Data-driven multi-objective predictive control of offshore wind farm based on evolutionary optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 974-986.
    6. Chaouachi, Aymen & Covrig, Catalin Felix & Ardelean, Mircea, 2017. "Multi-criteria selection of offshore wind farms: Case study for the Baltic States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 179-192.
    7. Majidi Nezhad, M. & Heydari, A. & Pirshayan, E. & Groppi, D. & Astiaso Garcia, D., 2021. "A novel forecasting model for wind speed assessment using sentinel family satellites images and machine learning method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 2198-2211.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dapeng Zhang & Yunsheng Ma & Huiling Zhang & Yi Zhang, 2024. "Marine Equipment Siting Using Machine-Learning-Based Ocean Remote Sensing Data: Current Status and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hugo Díaz & Carlos Guedes Soares, 2021. "A Multi-Criteria Approach to Evaluate Floating Offshore Wind Farms Siting in the Canary Islands (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Luengo, Jorge & Negro, Vicente & García-Barba, Javier & López-Gutiérrez, José-Santos & Esteban, M. Dolores, 2019. "New detected uncertainties in the design of foundations for offshore Wind Turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 667-677.
    3. Vladimir Franki & Darin Majnarić & Alfredo Višković, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Companies in the Power Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, January.
    4. Virtanen, E.A. & Lappalainen, J. & Nurmi, M. & Viitasalo, M. & Tikanmäki, M. & Heinonen, J. & Atlaskin, E. & Kallasvuo, M. & Tikkanen, H. & Moilanen, A., 2022. "Balancing profitability of energy production, societal impacts and biodiversity in offshore wind farm design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Li, Rui & Zhang, Jincheng & Zhao, Xiaowei, 2022. "Dynamic wind farm wake modeling based on a Bilateral Convolutional Neural Network and high-fidelity LES data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    6. Cheng, Biyi & Yao, Yingxue & Qu, Xiaobin & Zhou, Zhiming & Wei, Jionghui & Liang, Ertang & Zhang, Chengcheng & Kang, Hanwen & Wang, Hongjun, 2024. "Multi-objective parameter optimization of large-scale offshore wind Turbine's tower based on data-driven model with deep learning and machine learning methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    7. Mingyu Li & Dongxiao Niu & Zhengsen Ji & Xiwen Cui & Lijie Sun, 2021. "Forecast Research on Multidimensional Influencing Factors of Global Offshore Wind Power Investment Based on Random Forest and Elastic Net," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Ioannou, Anastasia & Angus, Andrew & Brennan, Feargal, 2018. "A lifecycle techno-economic model of offshore wind energy for different entry and exit instances," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 406-424.
    9. Lorenzo Cottura & Riccardo Caradonna & Alberto Ghigo & Riccardo Novo & Giovanni Bracco & Giuliana Mattiazzo, 2021. "Dynamic Modeling of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine for Application in the Mediterranean Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-34, January.
    10. Charakopoulos, Avraam & Karakasidis, Theodoros & Sarris, loannis, 2019. "Pattern identification for wind power forecasting via complex network and recurrence plot time series analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Wu, Minghao & Stratigaki, Vasiliki & Fazeres-Ferradosa, Tiago & Rosa-Santos, Paulo & Taveira-Pinto, Francisco & Troch, Peter, 2023. "Experimental uncertainty analysis of monopile scour protection stability tests," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 174-187.
    12. Hugo Díaz & C. Guedes Soares, 2022. "Multicriteria Decision Approach to the Design of Floating Wind Farm Export Cables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Christy Pérez-Albornoz & Ángel Hernández-Gómez & Victor Ramirez & Damien Guilbert, 2023. "Forecast Optimization of Wind Speed in the North Coast of the Yucatan Peninsula, Using the Single and Double Exponential Method," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Niccolo Bruschi & Giulio Ferri & Enzo Marino & Claudio Borri, 2020. "Influence of Clumps-Weighted Moorings on a Spar Buoy Offshore Wind Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Jiawei Wu & Jinyu Xiao & Jinming Hou & Xunyan Lyu, 2023. "Development Potential Assessment for Wind and Photovoltaic Power Energy Resources in the Main Desert–Gobi–Wilderness Areas of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Wang, Yu & Wei, Shanbi & Yang, Wei & Chai, Yi, 2023. "Adaptive economic predictive control for offshore wind farm active yaw considering generation uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    17. Zhao, Chengwei & Xu, Xuanhua & Liu, Ruihuan & He, Jishan, 2021. "A multi-aspect coordination HDRED site selection framework under multi-type heterogeneous environments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 833-848.
    18. Dimitra G. Vagiona & Manos Kamilakis, 2018. "Sustainable Site Selection for Offshore Wind Farms in the South Aegean—Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Peters, Jared L. & Remmers, Tiny & Wheeler, Andrew J. & Murphy, Jimmy & Cummins, Valerie, 2020. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of GIS use to reveal trends in offshore wind energy research and offer insights on best practices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    20. Wu, Xiaoni & Hu, Yu & Li, Ye & Yang, Jian & Duan, Lei & Wang, Tongguang & Adcock, Thomas & Jiang, Zhiyu & Gao, Zhen & Lin, Zhiliang & Borthwick, Alistair & Liao, Shijun, 2019. "Foundations of offshore wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 379-393.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:15:p:5616-:d:1202707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.