IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i10p4147-d1149246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Capacity and Operational Planning for Renewable Energy-Based Microgrid Considering Different Demand-Side Management Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Kipngetich Kiptoo

    (Graduate School of Science and Engineering, University of the Ryukyus, 1 Senbaru, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan)

  • Oludamilare Bode Adewuyi

    (Faculty of Engineering, Information and Systems, University of Tsukuba, 1 Chome-1-1 Tennodai, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan)

  • Harun Or Rashid Howlader

    (Hawai’i Natural Energy Institute, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA)

  • Akito Nakadomari

    (Graduate School of Science and Engineering, University of the Ryukyus, 1 Senbaru, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan)

  • Tomonobu Senjyu

    (Graduate School of Science and Engineering, University of the Ryukyus, 1 Senbaru, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan)

Abstract

A bi-objective joint optimization planning approach that combines component sizing and short-term operational planning into a single model with demand response strategies to realize a techno-economically feasible renewable energy-based microgrid is discussed in this paper. The system model includes a photovoltaic system, wind turbine, and battery. An enhanced demand response program with dynamic pricing devised based on instantaneous imbalances between surplus, deficit, and the battery’s power capacity is developed. A quantitative metric for assessing energy storage performance is also proposed and utilized. Emergency, critical peak pricing, and power capacity-based dynamic pricing (PCDP) demand response programs (DRPs) are comparatively analyzed to determine the most cost-effective planning approach. Four simulation scenarios to determine the most techno-economic planning approach are formulated and solved using a mixed-integer linear programming algorithm optimization solver with the epsilon constraint method in Matlab. The objective function is to minimize the total annualized costs (TACs) while satisfying the reliability criterion regarding the loss of power supply probability and energy storage dependency. The results show that including the DRP resulted in a significant reduction in TACs and system component capacities. The cost-benefit of incorporating PCDP DRP strategies in the planning model increases the overall system flexibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Kipngetich Kiptoo & Oludamilare Bode Adewuyi & Harun Or Rashid Howlader & Akito Nakadomari & Tomonobu Senjyu, 2023. "Optimal Capacity and Operational Planning for Renewable Energy-Based Microgrid Considering Different Demand-Side Management Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:4147-:d:1149246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/4147/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/4147/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiang, Yue & Cai, Hanhu & Gu, Chenghong & Shen, Xiaodong, 2020. "Cost-benefit analysis of integrated energy system planning considering demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Bonilla, Javier & Blanco, Julian & Zarza, Eduardo & Alarcón-Padilla, Diego C., 2022. "Feasibility and practical limits of full decarbonization of the electricity market with renewable energy: Application to the Spanish power sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    3. Prina, Matteo Giacomo & Lionetti, Matteo & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Sparber, Wolfram & Moser, David, 2019. "Transition pathways optimization methodology through EnergyPLAN software for long-term energy planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 356-368.
    4. Fodhil, F. & Hamidat, A. & Nadjemi, O., 2019. "Potential, optimization and sensitivity analysis of photovoltaic-diesel-battery hybrid energy system for rural electrification in Algeria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 613-624.
    5. Nwulu, Nnamdi I. & Xia, Xiaohua, 2017. "Optimal dispatch for a microgrid incorporating renewables and demand response," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 16-28.
    6. Groppi, Daniele & Pfeifer, Antun & Garcia, Davide Astiaso & Krajačić, Goran & Duić, Neven, 2021. "A review on energy storage and demand side management solutions in smart energy islands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    7. Mark Kipngetich Kiptoo & Oludamilare Bode Adewuyi & Mohammed Elsayed Lotfy & Theophilus Amara & Keifa Vamba Konneh & Tomonobu Senjyu, 2019. "Assessing the Techno-Economic Benefits of Flexible Demand Resources Scheduling for Renewable Energy–Based Smart Microgrid Planning," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Pang, Yi & Pan, Lei & Zhang, Jingmei & Chen, Jianwei & Dong, Yan & Sun, Hexu, 2022. "Integrated sizing and scheduling of an off-grid integrated energy system for an isolated renewable energy hydrogen refueling station," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    9. McPherson, Madeleine & Stoll, Brady, 2020. "Demand response for variable renewable energy integration: A proposed approach and its impacts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    10. Yousefi, Shaghayegh & Moghaddam, Mohsen Parsa & Majd, Vahid Johari, 2011. "Optimal real time pricing in an agent-based retail market using a comprehensive demand response model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 5716-5727.
    11. Wang, Xiaonan & Palazoglu, Ahmet & El-Farra, Nael H., 2015. "Operational optimization and demand response of hybrid renewable energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 324-335.
    12. Homeyra Akter & Harun Or Rashid Howlader & Ahmed Y. Saber & Paras Mandal & Hiroshi Takahashi & Tomonobu Senjyu, 2021. "Optimal Sizing of Hybrid Microgrid in a Remote Island Considering Advanced Direct Load Control for Demand Response and Low Carbon Emission," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Shang, Nan & Lin, You & Ding, Yi & Ye, Chengjin & Yan, Jinyue, 2019. "Nodal market power assessment of flexible demand resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 564-577.
    14. Dalala, Zakariya & Al-Omari, Murad & Al-Addous, Mohammad & Bdour, Mathhar & Al-Khasawneh, Yaqoub & Alkasrawi, Malek, 2022. "Increased renewable energy penetration in national electrical grids constraints and solutions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    15. Aalami, H.A. & Moghaddam, M. Parsa & Yousefi, G.R., 2010. "Demand response modeling considering Interruptible/Curtailable loads and capacity market programs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 243-250, January.
    16. Girolama Airò Farulla & Giovanni Tumminia & Francesco Sergi & Davide Aloisio & Maurizio Cellura & Vincenzo Antonucci & Marco Ferraro, 2021. "A Review of Key Performance Indicators for Building Flexibility Quantification to Support the Clean Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark Kipngetich Kiptoo & Oludamilare Bode Adewuyi & Masahiro Furukakoi & Paras Mandal & Tomonobu Senjyu, 2023. "Integrated Multi-Criteria Planning for Resilient Renewable Energy-Based Microgrid Considering Advanced Demand Response and Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Navid Rezaei & Abdollah Ahmadi & Mohammadhossein Deihimi, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review of Demand-Side Management Based on Analysis of Productivity: Techniques and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-28, October.
    2. Mimica, Marko & Dominković, Dominik Franjo & Capuder, Tomislav & Krajačić, Goran, 2021. "On the value and potential of demand response in the smart island archipelago," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 153-168.
    3. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Dehnavi, Ehsan & Abdi, Hamdi, 2016. "Optimal pricing in time of use demand response by integrating with dynamic economic dispatch problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1086-1094.
    5. Zheng, Yingying & Jenkins, Bryan M. & Kornbluth, Kurt & Træholt, Chresten, 2018. "Optimization under uncertainty of a biomass-integrated renewable energy microgrid with energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 204-217.
    6. Davarzani, Sima & Pisica, Ioana & Taylor, Gareth A. & Munisami, Kevin J., 2021. "Residential Demand Response Strategies and Applications in Active Distribution Network Management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Botelho, D.F. & de Oliveira, L.W. & Dias, B.H. & Soares, T.A. & Moraes, C.A., 2022. "Prosumer integration into the Brazilian energy sector: An overview of innovative business models and regulatory challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Rusche, Simon & Weissflog., Jan & Wenninger, Simon & Häckel, Björn, 2023. "How flexible are energy flexibilities? Developing a flexibility score for revenue and risk analysis in industrial demand-side management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    9. Pablo Benalcazar & Adam Suski & Jacek Kamiński, 2020. "Optimal Sizing and Scheduling of Hybrid Energy Systems: The Cases of Morona Santiago and the Galapagos Islands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Kocaman, Ayse Selin & Ozyoruk, Emin & Taneja, Shantanu & Modi, Vijay, 2020. "A stochastic framework to evaluate the impact of agricultural load flexibility on the sizing of renewable energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1067-1078.
    11. Mohseni, Soheil & Brent, Alan C. & Kelly, Scott & Browne, Will N., 2022. "Demand response-integrated investment and operational planning of renewable and sustainable energy systems considering forecast uncertainties: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Sadeghi, Delnia & Ahmadi, Seyed Ehsan & Amiri, Nima & Satinder, & Marzband, Mousa & Abusorrah, Abdullah & Rawa, Muhyaddin, 2022. "Designing, optimizing and comparing distributed generation technologies as a substitute system for reducing life cycle costs, CO2 emissions, and power losses in residential buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    13. Mark Kipngetich Kiptoo & Oludamilare Bode Adewuyi & Masahiro Furukakoi & Paras Mandal & Tomonobu Senjyu, 2023. "Integrated Multi-Criteria Planning for Resilient Renewable Energy-Based Microgrid Considering Advanced Demand Response and Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-25, September.
    14. Aghaei, Jamshid & Alizadeh, Mohammad-Iman, 2013. "Multi-objective self-scheduling of CHP (combined heat and power)-based microgrids considering demand response programs and ESSs (energy storage systems)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1044-1054.
    15. Li, Lanlan & Gong, Chengzhu & Wang, Deyun & Zhu, Kejun, 2013. "Multi-agent simulation of the time-of-use pricing policy in an urban natural gas pipeline network: A case study of Zhengzhou," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 37-43.
    16. Hu, Ming-Che & Lu, Su-Ying & Chen, Yen-Haw, 2016. "Stochastic–multiobjective market equilibrium analysis of a demand response program in energy market under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 500-506.
    17. Doostizadeh, Meysam & Ghasemi, Hassan, 2012. "A day-ahead electricity pricing model based on smart metering and demand-side management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 221-230.
    18. Shahryari, E. & Shayeghi, H. & Mohammadi-ivatloo, B. & Moradzadeh, M., 2018. "An improved incentive-based demand response program in day-ahead and intra-day electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 205-214.
    19. Boßmann, Tobias & Eser, Eike Johannes, 2016. "Model-based assessment of demand-response measures—A comprehensive literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1637-1656.
    20. Sousa, Joana & Soares, Isabel, 2023. "Benefits and barriers concerning demand response stakeholder value chain: A systematic literature review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:4147-:d:1149246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.