IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2022i1p127-d1012115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical Simulation of Geothermal Reservoir Reconstruction and Heat Extraction System Productivity Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Jinshou Zhu

    (Qinghai Bureau of Geological Survey, Xining 810001, China)

  • Zhenpeng Cui

    (College of Environment and Resources, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China)

  • Bo Feng

    (College of Environment and Resources, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China)

  • Hao Ren

    (College of Environment and Resources, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China)

  • Xin Liu

    (College of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

The key to ensuring the economic feasibility of EGS mainly includes two points. On the one hand, it is necessary to ensure the connectivity of the artificial fracture network; on the other hand, it is necessary to determine the most efficient geothermal energy exploitation mode. Most previous studies have only focused on one of the points. To restitute the entire geothermal energy development process, the two parts should be combined to conduct research. In this study, a random fractured medium model was established based on the TOUGH2-BIOT simulation program and the whole process of reservoir stimulation was analyzed. According to the results of reservoir stimulation, different geothermal energy exploitation schemes are set up, and the heat transfer efficiency of the conventional double vertical wells, the horizontal wells, and the double-pipe heat exchange system are comparatively analyzed. The results show that reservoir reconstruction is mainly divided into three stages: In the first stage, the hydraulic aperture of the conducting fractures reaches the maximum value; in the second stage, the non-conductive fractures overcome the in situ stress and become conducting fractures; in the third stage, the rock in the reservoir undergoes shear failure, the fractures expand and connect, and finally, a fracture network is formed. After each stage, the volume of the enhanced permeability area is approximately 10,000, 21,000, and 33,000 m 3 , respectively. After 30 years of exploitation, the outlet temperature and thermal power output of conventional double vertical wells are the highest, while the horizontal wells have the highest heat extraction ratio. The temperature of a production well in the conventional double vertical wells model, horizontal wells, and double-pipe heat exchange system is 101 °C, 93.4 °C, and 91.6 °C, a decrease of 41.2%, 45.7%, and 46.7%, respectively. The thermal power output is 6.67 MW, 6.31 MW, and 6.1 MW, a decrease of 39.4%, 42.6%, and 44.5%, respectively. The heat extraction ratio of the horizontal wells is 2% higher than the double-pipe heat exchange system and 6.5% higher than the conventional double vertical wells.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinshou Zhu & Zhenpeng Cui & Bo Feng & Hao Ren & Xin Liu, 2022. "Numerical Simulation of Geothermal Reservoir Reconstruction and Heat Extraction System Productivity Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:127-:d:1012115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/127/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/127/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Fangming & Chen, Jiliang & Huang, Wenbo & Luo, Liang, 2014. "A three-dimensional transient model for EGS subsurface thermo-hydraulic process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 300-310.
    2. Jianrong Lu & Ahmad Ghassemi, 2021. "Coupled Thermo–Hydro–Mechanical–Seismic Modeling of EGS Collab Experiment 1," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-30, January.
    3. Cui, Guodong & Pei, Shufeng & Rui, Zhenhua & Dou, Bin & Ning, Fulong & Wang, Jiaqiang, 2021. "Whole process analysis of geothermal exploitation and power generation from a depleted high-temperature gas reservoir by recycling CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Li, Gensheng & Yang, Ruiyue & Wang, Gaosheng & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng & Lyu, Zehao, 2018. "Numerical simulation of heat extraction performance in enhanced geothermal system with multilateral wells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 325-337.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timotej Verbovšek, 2023. "The Influence of Water Temperature on the Hydrogeochemical Composition of Groundwater during Water Extraction and Reinjection with Geothermal Heat," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shi, Yu & Song, Xianzhi & Shen, Zhonghou & Wang, Gaosheng & Li, Xiaojiang & Zheng, Rui & Geng, Lidong & Li, Jiacheng & Zhang, Shikun, 2018. "Numerical investigation on heat extraction performance of a CO2 enhanced geothermal system with multilateral wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 38-51.
    2. Yu Wang & Tianfu Xu & Yuxiang Cheng & Guanhong Feng, 2022. "Prospects for Power Generation of the Doublet Supercritical Geothermal System in Reykjanes Geothermal Field, Iceland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Han, Songcai & Cheng, Yuanfang & Gao, Qi & Yan, Chuanliang & Zhang, Jincheng, 2020. "Numerical study on heat extraction performance of multistage fracturing Enhanced Geothermal System," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1214-1226.
    4. Chen, Yun & Ma, Guowei & Wang, Huidong & Li, Tuo & Wang, Yang & Sun, Zizheng, 2020. "Optimizing heat mining strategies in a fractured geothermal reservoir considering fracture deformation effects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 326-337.
    5. Ding, Junfeng & Wang, Shimin, 2018. "2D modeling of well array operating enhanced geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 918-932.
    6. Xie, Jingxuan & Wang, Jiansheng, 2022. "Compatibility investigation and techno-economic performance optimization of whole geothermal power generation system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    7. Zinsalo, Joël M. & Lamarche, Louis & Raymond, Jasmin, 2022. "Performance analysis and working fluid selection of an Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plant coupled to an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    8. Ma, Yuanyuan & Li, Shibin & Zhang, Ligang & Liu, Songze & Liu, Zhaoyi & Li, Hao & Shi, Erxiu & Zhang, Haijun, 2020. "Numerical simulation study on the heat extraction performance of multi-well injection enhanced geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 782-795.
    9. Yu, Likui & Wu, Xiaotian & Hassan, N.M.S. & Wang, Yadan & Ma, Weiwu & Liu, Gang, 2020. "Modified zipper fracturing in enhanced geothermal system reservoir and heat extraction optimization via orthogonal design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 373-385.
    10. Zhang, Chao & Jiang, Guangzheng & Jia, Xiaofeng & Li, Shengtao & Zhang, Shengsheng & Hu, Di & Hu, Shengbiao & Wang, Yibo, 2019. "Parametric study of the production performance of an enhanced geothermal system: A case study at the Qiabuqia geothermal area, northeast Tibetan plateau," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 959-978.
    11. Gong, Facheng & Guo, Tiankui & Sun, Wei & Li, Zhaomin & Yang, Bin & Chen, Yimei & Qu, Zhanqing, 2020. "Evaluation of geothermal energy extraction in Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) with multiple fracturing horizontal wells (MFHW)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1339-1351.
    12. Song, Guofeng & Song, Xianzhi & Li, Gensheng & Shi, Yu & Wang, Gaosheng & Ji, Jiayan & Xu, Fuqiang & Song, Zihao, 2021. "An integrated multi-objective optimization method to improve the performance of multilateral-well geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1233-1249.
    13. Anand, R.S. & Li, Ang & Huang, Wenbo & Chen, Juanwen & Li, Zhibin & Ma, Qingshan & Jiang, Fangming, 2024. "Super-long gravity heat pipe for geothermal energy exploitation - A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Li, Xinxin & Li, Chengyu & Gong, Wenping & Zhang, Yanjie & Wang, Junchao, 2023. "Probabilistic analysis of heat extraction performance in enhanced geothermal system based on a DFN-based modeling scheme," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    15. Cao, Wenjiong & Huang, Wenbo & Chen, Juanwen & Li, Zhibin & Jiang, Fangming, 2023. "Numerical study on the heat extraction performance of enhanced geothermal systems with a well-fracture-reservoir combined model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 370-380.
    16. Tomasz Sliwa & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Andrzej Gonet & Tomasz Kowalski & Anna Sojczyńska, 2021. "Geothermal Boreholes in Poland—Overview of the Current State of Knowledge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Leszek Pająk & Anna Sowiżdżał & Paweł Gładysz & Barbara Tomaszewska & Maciej Miecznik & Trond Andresen & Bjørn S. Frengstad & Anna Chmielowska, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Studies and Assessment Supporting the Selection of Locations and Technologies Used in CO 2 -EGS Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Liu, Wei Victor, 2022. "Utilizing geothermal energy from enhanced geothermal systems as a heat source for oil sands separation: A numerical evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    19. Li, Kewen & Pan, Baozhi & Horne, Roland, 2015. "Evaluating fractures in rocks from geothermal reservoirs using resistivity at different frequencies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 1230-1238.
    20. Linkai Li & Xiao Guo & Ming Zhou & Gang Xiang & Ning Zhang & Yue Wang & Shengyuan Wang & Arnold Landjobo Pagou, 2021. "The Investigation of Fracture Networks on Heat Extraction Performance for an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:127-:d:1012115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.