IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i9p3329-d807898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanism of Cuttings Removing at the Bottom Hole by Pulsed Jet

Author

Listed:
  • Heqian Zhao

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Huaizhong Shi

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Zhongwei Huang

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Zhenliang Chen

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Ziang Gu

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

  • Fei Gao

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China)

Abstract

Vibration drilling technology induced by hydraulic pulse can assist the bit in breaking rock at deep formation. Simultaneously, the pulsed jet generated by the hydraulic pulse promotes removal of the cuttings from the bottom hole. Nowadays, the cuttings removal mechanism of the pulsed jet is not clear, which causes cuttings to accumulate at the bottom hole and increases the risk of repeated cutting. In this paper, a pressure-flow rate fluctuation model is established to analyze the fluctuation characteristics of the pulsed jet at the bottom hole. Based on the model, the effects of displacement, well depth, drilling fluid viscosity, and flow area of the pulsed jet tool on the feature of instantaneous flow at the bottom hole are discussed. The results show that the pulsed jet causes flow rate and pressure to fluctuate at the bottom hole. When the displacement changes from 20 L/s to 40 L/s in a 2000 m well, the pulsed jet generates a flow rate fluctuation of 4–9 L/s and pressure fluctuation of 0.1–0.5 MPa at the bottom hole. With the flow area of the tool increasing from 2 cm 2 to 4 cm 2 , the amplitude of flow rate fluctuation decreases by 72.5%, and the amplitude of pressure fluctuation decreases by more than 60%. Combined with the fluctuation feature of the flow field and the water jet attenuation law at the bottom hole, the force acting on the cuttings under the pulsed jet is derived. It is found that flow rate fluctuation improves the mechanical state of cuttings and is beneficial for cuttings tumbled off the bottom hole. This research provides theoretical guidance for pulsed jet cuttings cleaning at the bottom hole.

Suggested Citation

  • Heqian Zhao & Huaizhong Shi & Zhongwei Huang & Zhenliang Chen & Ziang Gu & Fei Gao, 2022. "Mechanism of Cuttings Removing at the Bottom Hole by Pulsed Jet," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3329-:d:807898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3329/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3329/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fry, Matthew, 2013. "Urban gas drilling and distance ordinances in the Texas Barnett Shale," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 79-89.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daoyi Zhu, 2023. "New Advances in Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-4, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yasminah Beebeejaun, 2017. "Exploring the intersections between local knowledge and environmental regulation: A study of shale gas extraction in Texas and Lancashire," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(3), pages 417-433, May.
    2. Ericson, Sean J. & Kaffine, Daniel T. & Maniloff, Peter, 2020. "Costs of increasing oil and gas setbacks are initially modest but rise sharply," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Fry, Matthew & Brannstrom, Christian, 2017. "Emergent patterns and processes in urban hydrocarbon governance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 383-393.
    4. Matthew Fry & Christian Brannstrom & Trey Murphy, 2015. "How Dallas became frack free: hydrocarbon governance under neoliberalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(12), pages 2591-2608, December.
    5. Banan, Zoya & Gernand, Jeremy M., 2021. "Emissions of particulate matter due to Marcellus Shale gas development in Pennsylvania: Mapping the implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).
    6. Michanowicz, Drew R. & Buonocore, Jonathan J. & Konschnik, Katherine E. & Goho, Shaun A. & Bernstein, Aaron S., 2021. "The effect of Pennsylvania's 500 ft surface setback regulation on siting unconventional natural gas wells near buildings: An interrupted time-series analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Bhavna Shamasunder & Ashley Collier-Oxandale & Jessica Blickley & James Sadd & Marissa Chan & Sandy Navarro & Michael Hannigan & Nicole J. Wong, 2018. "Community-Based Health and Exposure Study around Urban Oil Developments in South Los Angeles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Kroepsch, Adrianne C., 2018. "Horizontal drilling, changing patterns of extraction, and piecemeal participation: Urban hydrocarbon governance in Colorado," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 469-480.
    9. Jeffrey Rous & Vicki Oppenheim & Myungsup Kim & Matthew Fry & Chetan Tiwari & Murray Rice, 2020. "Evaluating determinants of shale gas well locations in an urban setting," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 65(3), pages 645-671, December.
    10. Cameron T. Whitley, 2019. "Exploring the Place of Animals and Human–Animal Relationships in Hydraulic Fracturing Discourse," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3329-:d:807898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.