IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i7p2508-d782310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

De-Risking Solar Receivers to Achieve SunShot Targets

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew L. Bauer

    (Solar Energy Technologies Office, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585, USA)

Abstract

Concentrating solar thermal (CST) systems are unique among renewable energy options for the ease of integration with thermal energy storage (TES). This enables dispatchable (or continuous) production of electricity, process heat, solar fuels, or other chemical products. The solar receiver in a CST system converts concentrated sunlight to transportable thermal energy. In solar power towers, the solar receiver’s physical limitations are often the constraining conditions for the system; they restrict maximum temperature, maximum solar concentration, or controllable chemical production. It is also a uniquely challenging component to prototype and test at sizes beyond the laboratory scale. Transitioning exceptional research innovations into viable components for an integrated system and ultimately leading to CST market adoption requires a multiscale vision for component de-risking and development. Technical requirements for holistic novel receiver development are reviewed based on learnings from the US Department of Energy’s (USDOE) SunShot Initiative, its active Third Generation of Concentrating Solar Power Systems (Gen3 CSP) program, and anticipation of requirements for future high value applications for CST. Context and learnings from the Gen3 CSP program are provided to exemplify successful receiver risk-reduction paradigms.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew L. Bauer, 2022. "De-Risking Solar Receivers to Achieve SunShot Targets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2508-:d:782310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2508/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2508/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Caccia & M. Tabandeh-Khorshid & G. Itskos & A. R. Strayer & A. S. Caldwell & S. Pidaparti & S. Singnisai & A. D. Rohskopf & A. M. Schroeder & D. Jarrahbashi & T. Kang & S. Sahoo & N. R. Kadasala & , 2018. "Ceramic–metal composites for heat exchangers in concentrated solar power plants," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7727), pages 406-409, October.
    2. Ho, Clifford K. & Iverson, Brian D., 2014. "Review of high-temperature central receiver designs for concentrating solar power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 835-846.
    3. Brantley H. Mills & Clifford K. Ho & Nathaniel R. Schroeder & Reid Shaeffer & Hendrik F. Laubscher & Kevin J. Albrecht, 2022. "Design Evaluation of a Next-Generation High-Temperature Particle Receiver for Concentrating Solar Thermal Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Wen-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Jiang, Rui & Hu, Yi-Huang & He, Ya-Ling, 2022. "Receiver with light-trapping nanostructured coating: A possible way to achieve high-efficiency solar thermal conversion for the next-generation concentrating solar power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 159-171.
    2. Rafique, Muhammad M. & Nathan, Graham & Saw, Woei, 2022. "Modelled annual thermal performance of a 50MWth refractory-lined particle-laden solar receiver operating above 1000°C," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 1081-1093.
    3. Okoroigwe, Edmund & Madhlopa, Amos, 2016. "An integrated combined cycle system driven by a solar tower: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 337-350.
    4. Pitot de la Beaujardiere, Jean-Francois P. & Reuter, Hanno C.R., 2018. "A review of performance modelling studies associated with open volumetric receiver CSP plant technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3848-3862.
    5. Mostafavi Tehrani, S. Saeed & Taylor, Robert A., 2016. "Off-design simulation and performance of molten salt cavity receivers in solar tower plants under realistic operational modes and control strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 698-715.
    6. Roldán, M.I. & Fernández-Reche, J. & Ballestrín, J., 2016. "Computational fluid dynamics evaluation of the operating conditions for a volumetric receiver installed in a solar tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 844-856.
    7. Li, Zhen & Lu, Daogang & Wang, Zhichao & Cao, Qiong, 2023. "Analysis on flow and heat transfer performance of SCO2 in airfoil channels with different fin angles of attack," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    8. Ma, Xiaojing & Xu, Jinliang & Xie, Jian, 2021. "In-situ phase separation to improve phase change heat transfer performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    9. Fernández, Angel G. & Gomez-Vidal, Judith & Oró, Eduard & Kruizenga, Alan & Solé, Aran & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2019. "Mainstreaming commercial CSP systems: A technology review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 152-176.
    10. Thanganadar, Dhinesh & Fornarelli, Francesco & Camporeale, Sergio & Asfand, Faisal & Gillard, Jonathon & Patchigolla, Kumar, 2022. "Thermo-economic analysis, optimisation and systematic integration of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle with sensible heat thermal energy storage for CSP application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    11. Wang, Xiaohe & Liu, Qibin & Bai, Zhang & Lei, Jing & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Thermodynamic investigations of the supercritical CO2 system with solar energy and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 108-118.
    12. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Qiu, Yu & Zhang, Yuwen, 2016. "A novel integrated simulation approach couples MCRT and Gebhart methods to simulate solar radiation transfer in a solar power tower system with a cavity receiver," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 93-107.
    13. Benkaciali, Saïd & Haddadi, Mourad & Khellaf, Abdellah, 2018. "Evaluation of direct solar irradiance from 18 broadband parametric models: Case of Algeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 694-711.
    14. Wang, Wujun & Fan, Liwu & Laumert, Björn, 2021. "A theoretical heat transfer analysis of different indirectly-irradiated receiver designs for high-temperature concentrating solar power applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1983-1993.
    15. Wu, Sean & Cheng, Chin-Hsiang & Hsiao, Yu-Jen & Juang, Rei-Cheng & Wen, Wen-Fu, 2016. "Fe2O3 films on stainless steel for solar absorbers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 574-580.
    16. Conroy, Tim & Collins, Maurice N. & Fisher, James & Grimes, Ronan, 2018. "Thermal and mechanical analysis of a sodium-cooled solar receiver operating under a novel heliostat aiming point strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 590-614.
    17. Guilong Dai & Jiangfei Huangfu & Xiaoyu Wang & Shenghua Du & Tian Zhao, 2023. "A Review of Radiative Heat Transfer in Fixed-Bed Particle Solar Receivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-37, June.
    18. Du, Shen & Tong, Zi-Xiang & Zhang, Hong-Hu & He, Ya-Ling, 2019. "Tomography-based determination of Nusselt number correlation for the porous volumetric solar receiver with different geometrical parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 711-718.
    19. Loni, R. & Askari Asli-Ardeh, E. & Ghobadian, B. & Kasaeian, A.B. & Bellos, Evangelos, 2018. "Thermal performance comparison between Al2O3/oil and SiO2/oil nanofluids in cylindrical cavity receiver based on experimental study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 652-665.
    20. Carlos E. Arreola-Ramos & Omar Álvarez-Brito & Juan Daniel Macías & Aldo Javier Guadarrama-Mendoza & Manuel A. Ramírez-Cabrera & Armando Rojas-Morin & Patricio J. Valadés-Pelayo & Heidi Isabel Villafá, 2021. "Experimental Evaluation and Modeling of Air Heating in a Ceramic Foam Volumetric Absorber by Effective Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2508-:d:782310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.