IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i6p2248-d774804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregating and Ranking Function Approach for the Rating of Battery ‘End-of-Life’ Handling Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Olubayo Moses Babatunde

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria 0001, South Africa)

  • Josiah Lange Munda

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria 0001, South Africa)

  • Yskandar Hamam

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
    École Supérieure d’Ingénieurs en Électrotechnique et Électronique, Cité Descartes, 2 Boulevard Blaise Pascal, Noisy-le-Grand, 93160 Paris, France)

Abstract

The increased adoption of intermittent renewable sources in the energy sector has also increased the use of battery storage systems. However, the negative impact which the improper disposal of batteries has on the environment has stirred debates on its sustainability. To ensure the proper disposal of battery waste, there is a need to identify and rank the most preferred battery ‘end-of-life’ handling alternatives. This paper focuses on identifying the most preferred ‘end-of-life’ handling alternatives for batteries using a modified triangular intuitionistic fuzzy aggregating and ranking function (TIFARF) model. To test the proposed modified TIFARF model, opinions from experts in the Nigerian renewable energy sector were collected, and the results show that the most preferred alternative is incineration, with a closeness coefficient of 0.130, while the least preferred alternative is recycling, whose closeness coefficient is 0.112. The results are an indication of a lack of facilities needed for the proper recycling of battery remains after their lifetime; if adequate facilities are available, the opinion of experts may be biased towards other alternatives. Future studies should focus on more battery ‘end-of-life’ handling alternatives and on countries with adequate facilities that can be used to manage batteries at the end of their lifespan.

Suggested Citation

  • Olubayo Moses Babatunde & Josiah Lange Munda & Yskandar Hamam, 2022. "Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregating and Ranking Function Approach for the Rating of Battery ‘End-of-Life’ Handling Alternatives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:6:p:2248-:d:774804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/6/2248/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/6/2248/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt, Julian David & Zakeri, Behnam & Lopes, Rafael & Barbosa, Paulo Sérgio Franco & Nascimento, Andreas & Castro, Nivalde José de & Brandão, Roberto & Schneider, Paulo Smith & Wada, Yoshihide, 2020. "Existing and new arrangements of pumped-hydro storage plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Huiru Zhao & Sen Guo, 2014. "Selecting Green Supplier of Thermal Power Equipment by Using a Hybrid MCDM Method for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Kebede, Abraham Alem & Kalogiannis, Theodoros & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Berecibar, Maitane, 2022. "A comprehensive review of stationary energy storage devices for large scale renewable energy sources grid integration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    4. Dehghani-Sanij, A.R. & Tharumalingam, E. & Dusseault, M.B. & Fraser, R., 2019. "Study of energy storage systems and environmental challenges of batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 192-208.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahfoud, Rabea Jamil & Alkayem, Nizar Faisal & Zhang, Yuquan & Zheng, Yuan & Sun, Yonghui & Alhelou, Hassan Haes, 2023. "Optimal operation of pumped hydro storage-based energy systems: A compendium of current challenges and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Hunt, Julian David & Nascimento, Andreas & Zakeri, Behnam & Barbosa, Paulo Sérgio Franco, 2022. "Hydrogen Deep Ocean Link: a global sustainable interconnected energy grid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    3. Li, Shunxi & Su, Bowen & St-Pierre, David L. & Sui, Pang-Chieh & Zhang, Guofang & Xiao, Jinsheng, 2017. "Decision-making of compressed natural gas station siting for public transportation: Integration of multi-objective optimization, fuzzy evaluating, and radar charting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 11-17.
    4. Cheayb, Mohamad & Marin Gallego, Mylène & Tazerout, Mohand & Poncet, Sébastien, 2022. "A techno-economic analysis of small-scale trigenerative compressed air energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    5. Mehmet C. Yagci & Thomas Feldmann & Elmar Bollin & Michael Schmidt & Wolfgang G. Bessler, 2022. "Aging Characteristics of Stationary Lithium-Ion Battery Systems with Serial and Parallel Cell Configurations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Thi Kim Tuoi, Truong & Van Toan, Nguyen & Ono, Takahito, 2022. "Self-powered wireless sensing system driven by daily ambient temperature energy harvesting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    7. Yurter, Gulin & Nadar, Emre & Kocaman, Ayse Selin, 2024. "The impact of pumped hydro energy storage configurations on investment planning of hybrid systems with renewables," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    8. Hong, Sanghyun & Kim, Eunsung & Jeong, Saerok, 2023. "Evaluating the sustainability of the hydrogen economy using multi-criteria decision-making analysis in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 485-492.
    9. Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Amiri, Maghsoud, 2023. "Evaluating the risks of the internet of things in renewable energy systems using a hybrid fuzzy decision approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    10. Toufani, Parinaz & Nadar, Emre & Kocaman, Ayse Selin, 2022. "Short-term assessment of pumped hydro energy storage configurations: Up, down, or closed?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 1086-1095.
    11. Barbaros, Efe & Aydin, Ismail & Celebioglu, Kutay, 2021. "Feasibility of pumped storage hydropower with existing pricing policy in Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    12. Huiru Zhao & Nana Li, 2016. "Performance Evaluation for Sustainability of Strong Smart Grid by Using Stochastic AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Cimmino, Luca & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2023. "Renewable smart energy network: A thermoeconomic comparison between conventional lithium-ion batteries and reversible solid oxide fuel cells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 74-95.
    14. Elsisi, Mahmoud & Bazmohammadi, Najmeh & Guerrero, Josep M. & Ebrahim, Mohamed A., 2021. "Energy management of controllable loads in multi-area power systems with wind power penetration based on new supervisor fuzzy nonlinear sliding mode control," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    15. Huang, Yuqing & Lan, Hai & Hong, Ying-Yi & Wen, Shuli & Fang, Sidun, 2020. "Joint voyage scheduling and economic dispatch for all-electric ships with virtual energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Rajan, Rijo & Fernandez, Francis M. & Yang, Yongheng, 2021. "Primary frequency control techniques for large-scale PV-integrated power systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    17. Pin-Han Chen & Cheng-Han Lee & Jun-Yi Wu & Wei-Sheng Chen, 2023. "Perspectives on Taiwan’s Pathway to Net-Zero Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, March.
    18. Tatiana Potapenko & Jessica S. Döhler & Francisco Francisco & George Lavidas & Irina Temiz, 2023. "Renewable Energy Potential for Micro-Grid at Hvide Sande," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Pedram Asef & Marzia Milan & Andrew Lapthorn & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban, 2021. "Future Trends and Aging Analysis of Battery Energy Storage Systems for Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-28, December.
    20. Defu Cai & Zuowei Wang & Shihong Miao & Rusi Chen & Zhong Zheng & Kunpeng Zhou, 2022. "Wind-Photovoltaic-Energy Storage System Collaborative Planning Strategy Considering the Morphological Evolution of the Transmission and Distribution Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:6:p:2248-:d:774804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.