IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i24p9482-d1003194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Process Modeling of Topside Systems for Evaluating Power Consumption and Possibilities of Using Wind Power

Author

Listed:
  • Leila Eyni

    (Department of Geoscience and Petroleum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7031 Trondheim, Norway
    These authors contributed to this work in the order of their names.)

  • Milan Stanko

    (Department of Geoscience and Petroleum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7031 Trondheim, Norway
    These authors contributed to this work in the order of their names.)

  • Heiner Schümann

    (Process Technology, Sintef Industry, 7465 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Ali Hassan Qureshi

    (Department of Geoscience and Petroleum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7031 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

Norwegian offshore wind farms may be able to supply power to offshore oil and gas platforms in the near future thanks to the expeditious development of offshore wind technology. This would result in a reduction in CO 2 emissions from oil and gas offshore installations, which are currently powered predominantly by gas turbines. The challenge with using wind power is that offshore oil and gas installations require a fairly constant and stable source of power, whereas wind power typically exhibits significant fluctuations over time. The purpose of this study is to perform a technical feasibility evaluation of using wind power to supply an offshore oil and gas installation on the basis of dynamic process simulations. Throughout the study, only the topside processing system is considered, since it is the most energy-intensive part of an oil and gas facility. An offshore field on the Norwegian Continental Shelf is used as a case study. The results indicate that, when the processing system operates in steady-state conditions, it cannot be powered solely by wind energy, and another power source is required to compensate for low wind power generation intervals. An alternative would be to store wind energy during periods of high generation (e.g., by producing hydrogen or ammonia) and use it during periods of low generation. Utilizing energy storage methods, wind energy can be continuously used for longer periods of time and provide a suitable constant power source for the studied case. Higher constant power can also be provided by increasing the efficiency of energy recovery and storage processes. Alternatively, these two technologies may be integrated with gas turbines if the required storage cannot be provided or higher power is required. It was estimated that the integration of wind energy could result in noticeable reductions in CO 2 emissions for the case study. Additionally, according to the results, the production, storage, and reuse of hydrogen and ammonia on-site may be viable options for supplying power.

Suggested Citation

  • Leila Eyni & Milan Stanko & Heiner Schümann & Ali Hassan Qureshi, 2022. "Dynamic Process Modeling of Topside Systems for Evaluating Power Consumption and Possibilities of Using Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:24:p:9482-:d:1003194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/24/9482/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/24/9482/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mäkitie, Tuukka & Normann, Håkon E. & Thune, Taran M. & Sraml Gonzalez, Jakoba, 2019. "The green flings: Norwegian oil and gas industry’s engagement in offshore wind power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 269-279.
    2. McDonagh, Shane & Ahmed, Shorif & Desmond, Cian & Murphy, Jerry D, 2020. "Hydrogen from offshore wind: Investor perspective on the profitability of a hybrid system including for curtailment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    3. Wang, Bo & Zhou, Min & Xin, Bo & Zhao, Xin & Watada, Junzo, 2019. "Analysis of operation cost and wind curtailment using multi-objective unit commitment with battery energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 101-114.
    4. Eyni, Leila & Stanko, Milan & Schümann, Heiner, 2022. "Methods for early-phase planning of offshore fields considering environmental performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiu, Rui & Liao, Qi & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Liang, Yongtu & Guo, Zhichao & Chen, Jinyu & Zhang, Haoran, 2022. "Roadmap to urban energy internet with wind electricity-natural gas nexus: Economic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    2. Qiu, Rui & Zhang, Haoran & Wang, Guotao & Liang, Yongtu & Yan, Jinyue, 2023. "Green hydrogen-based energy storage service via power-to-gas technologies integrated with multi-energy microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    3. Wiegner, J.F. & Andreasson, L.M. & Kusters, J.E.H. & Nienhuis, R.M., 2024. "Interdisciplinary perspectives on offshore energy system integration in the North Sea: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    4. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Homes of the future: Unpacking public perceptions to power the domestic hydrogen transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Noshchenko, Olga & Hagspiel, Verena, 2024. "Environmental and economic multi-objective real options analysis: Electrification choices for field development investment planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    6. Tuukka Mäkitie & Allan D. Andersen & Jens Hanson, 2019. "Multidimensional relatedness between innovation systems in sustainability transitions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1926, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2019.
    7. Wang, Cheng & Liu, Chuang & Lin, Yuzhang & Bi, Tianshu, 2020. "Day-ahead dispatch of integrated electric-heat systems considering weather-parameter-driven residential thermal demands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. Dong, Jizhe & Han, Shunjie & Shao, Xiangxin & Tang, Like & Chen, Renhui & Wu, Longfei & Zheng, Cunlong & Li, Zonghao & Li, Haolin, 2021. "Day-ahead wind-thermal unit commitment considering historical virtual wind power data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    9. Elena Shadrina, 2020. "Non-Hydropower Renewable Energy in Central Asia: Assessment of Deployment Status and Analysis of Underlying Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    10. López Prol, Javier & Zilberman, David, 2023. "No alarms and no surprises: Dynamics of renewable energy curtailment in California," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Rongyong Zhao & Daheng Dong & Cuiling Li & Steven Liu & Hao Zhang & Miyuan Li & Wenzhong Shen, 2020. "An Improved Power Control Approach for Wind Turbine Fatigue Balancing in an Offshore Wind Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Zhang, Pengfei & Ma, Chao & Lian, Jijian & Li, Peiyao & Liu, Lu, 2024. "Medium- and long-term operation optimization of the LCHES-WP hybrid power system considering the settlement rules of the electricity trading market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    13. Jovan, David Jure & Dolanc, Gregor & Pregelj, Boštjan, 2022. "Utilization of excess water accumulation for green hydrogen production in a run-of-river hydropower plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 780-794.
    14. Armenia Androniceanu & Oana Matilda Sabie, 2022. "Overview of Green Energy as a Real Strategic Option for Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-35, November.
    15. van der Loos, Adriaan & Normann, Håkon E. & Hanson, Jens & Hekkert, Marko P., 2021. "The co-evolution of innovation systems and context: Offshore wind in Norway and the Netherlands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. McMorland, J. & Collu, M. & McMillan, D. & Carroll, J. & Coraddu, A., 2023. "Opportunistic maintenance for offshore wind: A review and proposal of future framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Masihy C., Elias & Carvajal, Danilo & Oliva H., Sebastian, 2024. "Impact of delivery time, local renewable sources, and generation curtailment on the levelized cost of hydrogen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    18. Okunlola, Ayodeji & Davis, Matthew & Kumar, Amit, 2023. "Assessing the cost competitiveness of electrolytic hydrogen production from small modular nuclear reactor-based power plants: A price-following perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    19. Bødal, Espen Flo & Holm, Sigmund Eggen & Subramanian, Avinash & Durakovic, Goran & Pinel, Dimitri & Hellemo, Lars & Ortiz, Miguel Muñoz & Knudsen, Brage Rugstad & Straus, Julian, 2024. "Hydrogen for harvesting the potential of offshore wind: A North Sea case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    20. Superchi, Francesco & Mati, Alessandro & Carcasci, Carlo & Bianchini, Alessandro, 2023. "Techno-economic analysis of wind-powered green hydrogen production to facilitate the decarbonization of hard-to-abate sectors: A case study on steelmaking," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:24:p:9482-:d:1003194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.