IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i22p8748-d979256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multipoint Design Optimization of a Radial-Outflow Turbine for Kalina Cycle System Considering Flexible Operating Conditions and Variable Ammonia-Water Mass Fraction

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Song

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Jinju Sun

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Shengyuan Wang

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Xuesong Wang

    (School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

Abstract

The radial-outflow turbine has advantages due to its liquid-rich gas adaptability when applied in the Kalina ammonia-water cycle system. However, the operational conditions of the turbine often deviate from its design values due to changes of the heat source or the cooling conditions, and such deviates may deteriorate the flow behavior and degrade the turbine performance. To enhance the turbine efficiency at complex conditions for flexible running of the Kalina cycle system, a multipoint design optimization method is developed: the flexible operating has been defined by three critical, dimensionless parameters, which cover a wide range in a 3D operating space; the representative off-design points are identified to define the objective function; and adaptive optimization methods are integrated to permit optimization searching using limited CFD callings. The developed multipoint design method is adopted to improve the turbine performance under complex operating conditions. The obtained results demonstrate that the application of the developed multipoint optimization method effectively eliminates the flow separation at various operating conditions; thus, the turbine off-design performance has been comprehensively improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Song & Jinju Sun & Shengyuan Wang & Xuesong Wang, 2022. "Multipoint Design Optimization of a Radial-Outflow Turbine for Kalina Cycle System Considering Flexible Operating Conditions and Variable Ammonia-Water Mass Fraction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8748-:d:979256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8748/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8748/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Hongyang & Rane, Sham & Yu, Zhibin & Yu, Guopeng, 2021. "An inverse mean-line design method for optimizing radial outflow two-phase turbines in geothermal systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 463-490.
    2. Song, Yanping & Sun, Xiaojing & Huang, Diangui, 2017. "Preliminary design and performance analysis of a centrifugal turbine for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1239-1251.
    3. Jun-Seong Kim & Do-Yeop Kim, 2020. "Preliminary Design and Off-Design Analysis of a Radial Outflow Turbine for Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Roy, J.P. & Mishra, M.K. & Misra, Ashok, 2010. "Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a waste heat recovery system using Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5049-5062.
    5. Ibrahim, Mounir B. & Kovach, Ronald M., 1993. "A Kalina cycle application for power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 961-969.
    6. Zanellato, Luca & Astolfi, Marco & Serafino, Aldo & Rizzi, Dario & Macchi, Ennio, 2020. "Field performance evaluation of geothermal ORC power plants with a focus on radial outflow turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2896-2904.
    7. Sauret, Emilie & Gu, Yuantong, 2014. "Three-dimensional off-design numerical analysis of an organic Rankine cycle radial-inflow turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 202-211.
    8. Hagen, Brede A.L. & Agromayor, Roberto & Nekså, Petter, 2021. "Equation-oriented methods for design optimization and performance analysis of radial inflow turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    9. Al Jubori, Ayad M. & Al-Dadah, Raya & Mahmoud, Saad, 2017. "Performance enhancement of a small-scale organic Rankine cycle radial-inflow turbine through multi-objective optimization algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 297-311.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyle Grimaldi & Ahmad Najjaran & Zhiwei Ma & Huashan Bao & Tony Roskilly, 2023. "Dynamic Modelling and Experimental Validation of a Pneumatic Radial Piston Motor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Cheng, Ziyang & Wang, Jiangfeng & Hu, Bin & Chen, Liangqi & Lou, Juwei & Cheng, Shangfang & Wu, Weifeng, 2024. "Improved modelling for ammonia-water power cycle coupled with turbine optimization design: A comparison study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun-Seong Kim & You-Taek Kim & Do-Yeop Kim, 2022. "Preliminary Design and Blade Optimization of a Two-Stage Radial Outflow Turbine for a CO 2 Power Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Zhang, Chengbin & Wu, Zhe & Wang, Jiadian & Ding, Ce & Gao, Tieyu & Chen, Yongping, 2023. "Thermodynamic performance of a radial-inflow turbine for ocean thermal energy conversion using ammonia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 907-920.
    3. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2012. "Exergy analysis and parameter study on a novel auto-cascade Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 539-547.
    4. Peng Li & Zhonghe Han & Xiaoqiang Jia & Zhongkai Mei & Xu Han, 2018. "Analysis of the Effects of Blade Installation Angle and Blade Number on Radial-Inflow Turbine Stator Flow Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Jun-Seong Kim & Do-Yeop Kim, 2020. "Preliminary Design and Off-Design Analysis of a Radial Outflow Turbine for Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Enhua Wang & Ningjian Peng, 2023. "A Review on the Preliminary Design of Axial and Radial Turbines for Small-Scale Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Fuhaid Alshammari & Apostolos Pesyridis & Mohamed Elashmawy, 2020. "Generation of 3D Turbine Blades for Automotive Organic Rankine Cycles: Mathematical and Computational Perspectives," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-30, December.
    8. Wang, Yuqi & Liu, Tianyuan & Meng, Yue & Zhang, Di & Xie, Yonghui, 2022. "Integrated optimization for design and operation of turbomachinery in a solar-based Brayton cycle based on deep learning techniques," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    9. Li, Jinxing & Liu, Tianyuan & Wang, Yuqi & Xie, Yonghui, 2022. "Integrated graph deep learning framework for flow field reconstruction and performance prediction of turbomachinery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    10. Kadhim, Hakim T. & Rona, Aldo, 2018. "Design optimization workflow and performance analysis for contoured endwalls of axial turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 875-889.
    11. Song, Yanping & Sun, Xiaojing & Huang, Diangui, 2017. "Preliminary design and performance analysis of a centrifugal turbine for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1239-1251.
    12. Carlo Carcasci & Lapo Cheli & Pietro Lubello & Lorenzo Winchler, 2020. "Off-Design Performances of an Organic Rankine Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery from Gas Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Mohsen Sadeghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2022. "Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    14. Fabien Marty & Sylvain Serra & Sabine Sochard & Jean-Michel Reneaume, 2019. "Exergy Analysis and Optimization of a Combined Heat and Power Geothermal Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    15. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2015. "A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 365-377.
    16. Kim, Dong Kyu & Lee, Ji Sung & Kim, Jinwoo & Kim, Mo Se & Kim, Min Soo, 2017. "Parametric study and performance evaluation of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system using low-grade heat at temperatures below 80°C," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 55-65.
    17. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    18. Baccioli, A. & Antonelli, M. & Desideri, U., 2017. "Technical and economic analysis of organic flash regenerative cycles (OFRCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 69-87.
    19. Wang, Jiangfeng & Yan, Zhequan & Wang, Man & Dai, Yiping, 2013. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of an ammonia-water power system with LNG (liquefied natural gas) as its heat sink," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 513-522.
    20. Ge, Zhong & Wang, Hua & Wang, Hui-Tao & Wang, Jian-Jun & Li, Ming & Wu, Fu-Zhong & Zhang, Song-Yuan, 2015. "Main parameters optimization of regenerative organic Rankine cycle driven by low-temperature flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1886-1895.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8748-:d:979256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.