IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i9p2258-d166136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Effects of Blade Installation Angle and Blade Number on Radial-Inflow Turbine Stator Flow Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Li

    (Key Lab of Condition Monitoring and Control for Power Plant Equipment, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Zhonghe Han

    (Key Lab of Condition Monitoring and Control for Power Plant Equipment, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Xiaoqiang Jia

    (Key Lab of Condition Monitoring and Control for Power Plant Equipment, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Zhongkai Mei

    (Key Lab of Condition Monitoring and Control for Power Plant Equipment, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Xu Han

    (Key Lab of Condition Monitoring and Control for Power Plant Equipment, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

Abstract

Organic Rankine cycle (ORC) is a reliable technology to recover low-grade heat sources. The radial-inflow turbine is a critical component, which has a significant influence on the overall efficiency of ORC system. This study investigates the effects of the blade installation angle and blade number on the flow performance of radial-inflow turbine stator. R245fa and toluene were selected as the working fluids in the low and high temperature range, respectively. Two-dimensional stator blades model for the two working fluids were established, and numerical simulation was conducted through Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software. The results show that for low temperature working fluid R245fa, when the installation angle is 32° and blade number is 22, the distribution of static pressure along the stator blade has no obvious pressure fluctuation, and the flow loss is least. Meanwhile, the stator blade obtained the optimal performance. For high temperature working fluid toluene, when the installation angle is 28° and blade number is 32, the average outlet temperature is the lowest, while the average outlet velocity is the largest. The flow state is well and smooth, and the remarkable flow separation and shock wave are not present. Moreover, the stator blade for R245fa has a larger chord length, cascade inlet diameter, and cascade outside diameter but a lower blade number compared to toluene.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Li & Zhonghe Han & Xiaoqiang Jia & Zhongkai Mei & Xu Han, 2018. "Analysis of the Effects of Blade Installation Angle and Blade Number on Radial-Inflow Turbine Stator Flow Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:9:p:2258-:d:166136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/9/2258/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/9/2258/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Song, Yanping & Sun, Xiaojing & Huang, Diangui, 2017. "Preliminary design and performance analysis of a centrifugal turbine for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1239-1251.
    2. Zhonghe Han & Peng Li & Xu Han & Zhongkai Mei & Zhi Wang, 2017. "Thermo-Economic Performance Analysis of a Regenerative Superheating Organic Rankine Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Da Lio, Luca & Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2017. "A mean-line model to predict the design efficiency of radial inflow turbines in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 187-209.
    4. Kim, Do-Yeop & Kim, You-Taek, 2017. "Preliminary design and performance analysis of a radial inflow turbine for ocean thermal energy conversion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 255-263.
    5. Sauret, Emilie & Gu, Yuantong, 2014. "Three-dimensional off-design numerical analysis of an organic Rankine cycle radial-inflow turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 202-211.
    6. Fiaschi, Daniele & Manfrida, Giampaolo & Maraschiello, Francesco, 2015. "Design and performance prediction of radial ORC turboexpanders," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 517-532.
    7. Rahbar, Kiyarash & Mahmoud, Saad & Al-Dadah, Raya K. & Moazami, Nima, 2015. "Parametric analysis and optimization of a small-scale radial turbine for Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 696-711.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheming Tong & Zhewu Cheng & Shuiguang Tong, 2019. "Preliminary Design of Multistage Radial Turbines Based on Rotor Loss Characteristics under Variable Operating Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Ran Tao & Ruofu Xiao & Zhengwei Wang, 2018. "Influence of Blade Leading-Edge Shape on Cavitation in a Centrifugal Pump Impeller," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deligant, Michael & Sauret, Emilie & Danel, Quentin & Bakir, Farid, 2020. "Performance assessment of a standard radial turbine as turbo expander for an adapted solar concentration ORC," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2833-2841.
    2. Zou, Aihong & Chassaing, Jean-Camille & Persky, Rodney & Gu, YuanTong & Sauret, Emilie, 2019. "Uncertainty Quantification in high-density fluid radial-inflow turbines for renewable low-grade temperature cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 313-330.
    3. Da Lio, Luca & Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2017. "A mean-line model to predict the design efficiency of radial inflow turbines in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 187-209.
    4. Li, Xiaoming & Lv, Cui & Yang, Shaoqi & Li, Jian & Deng, Bicai & Li, Qing, 2019. "Preliminary design and performance analysis of a radial inflow turbine for a large-scale helium cryogenic system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 106-116.
    5. Jun-Seong Kim & Do-Yeop Kim, 2020. "Preliminary Design and Off-Design Analysis of a Radial Outflow Turbine for Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Meroni, Andrea & Robertson, Miles & Martinez-Botas, Ricardo & Haglind, Fredrik, 2018. "A methodology for the preliminary design and performance prediction of high-pressure ratio radial-inflow turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1062-1078.
    7. Enhua Wang & Ningjian Peng, 2023. "A Review on the Preliminary Design of Axial and Radial Turbines for Small-Scale Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Nithesh, K.G. & Chatterjee, Dhiman, 2016. "Numerical prediction of the performance of radial inflow turbine designed for ocean thermal energy conversion system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 1-16.
    9. Jankowski, Marcin & Klonowicz, Piotr & Borsukiewicz, Aleksandra, 2021. "Multi-objective optimization of an ORC power plant using one-dimensional design of a radial-inflow turbine with backswept rotor blades," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    10. Fuhaid Alshammari & Apostolos Pesyridis & Mohamed Elashmawy, 2020. "Generation of 3D Turbine Blades for Automotive Organic Rankine Cycles: Mathematical and Computational Perspectives," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-30, December.
    11. Zaniewski, Dawid & Klimaszewski, Piotr & Klonowicz, Piotr & Lampart, Piotr & Witanowski, Łukasz & Jędrzejewski, Łukasz & Suchocki, Tomasz & Antczak, Łukasz, 2021. "Performance of the honeycomb type sealings in organic vapour microturbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    12. Al Jubori, Ayad M. & Al-Dadah, Raya K. & Mahmoud, Saad & Daabo, Ahmed, 2017. "Modelling and parametric analysis of small-scale axial and radial-outflow turbines for Organic Rankine Cycle applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 981-996.
    13. Mounier, Violette & Olmedo, Luis Eric & Schiffmann, Jürg, 2018. "Small scale radial inflow turbine performance and pre-design maps for Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1072-1084.
    14. Kadhim, Hakim T. & Rona, Aldo, 2018. "Off-design performance of a liquefied natural gas plant with an axial turbine of novel endwall design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 830-839.
    15. Jun-Seong Kim & You-Taek Kim & Do-Yeop Kim, 2022. "Preliminary Design and Blade Optimization of a Two-Stage Radial Outflow Turbine for a CO 2 Power Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Al Jubori, Ayad M. & Al-Dadah, Raya & Mahmoud, Saad, 2017. "Performance enhancement of a small-scale organic Rankine cycle radial-inflow turbine through multi-objective optimization algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 297-311.
    17. Zhang, Chengbin & Wu, Zhe & Wang, Jiadian & Ding, Ce & Gao, Tieyu & Chen, Yongping, 2023. "Thermodynamic performance of a radial-inflow turbine for ocean thermal energy conversion using ammonia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 907-920.
    18. Wang, Zhiqi & Xie, Baoqi & Xia, Xiaoxia & Luo, Lan & Yang, Huya & Li, Xin, 2023. "Entropy production analysis of a radial inflow turbine with variable inlet guide vane for ORC application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    19. Witanowski, Łukasz & Ziółkowski, Paweł & Klonowicz, Piotr & Lampart, Piotr, 2023. "A hybrid approach to optimization of radial inflow turbine with principal component analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    20. Ma, Qingfen & Gao, Zezhou & Huang, Jie & Mahian, Omid & Feng, Xin & Lu, Hui & Wang, Shenghui & Wang, Chengpeng & Tang, Rongnian & Li, Jingru, 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis and turbine design of a 100 kW OTEC-ORC with binary non-azeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:9:p:2258-:d:166136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.