IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i22p8744-d979152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production and Testing of Butyl and Methyl Esters as New Generation Biodiesels from Fatty Wastes of the Leather Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Dariusz Kurczyński

    (Department of Automotive Vehicles and Transportation, Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Kielce University of Technology, 25-314 Kielce, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Wcisło

    (Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Energy and Automation, Faculty of Production Engineering and Power Technologies, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-120 Kraków, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Leśniak

    (Department of General Chemistry, Institute of Quality and Product Management Sciences, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Kraków, Poland)

  • Miłosław Kozak

    (Institute of Combustion Engines and Powertrain, Faculty of Civil and Transport Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznań, Poland)

  • Piotr Łagowski

    (Department of Automotive Vehicles and Transportation, Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Kielce University of Technology, 25-314 Kielce, Poland)

Abstract

Climate changes caused by the greenhouse effect make it necessary to look for new sources of energy. One of them is waste of a biological origin. They are often difficult to dispose of and such a process can be expensive. Increasingly, they are used to produce biofuels that can replace petroleum-based fuels. They are also an alternative to food-based biofuels. The aim of the work was to propose a method of using fatty waste generated in a plant dealing with tanning animal skins and to evaluate the properties of the produced biofuels. The authors decided to use this waste to produce biodiesel. A patented reactor and technology developed by one of the co-authors was used for this purpose. Two alcohols, butyl and methyl, were used to produce esters in the transesterification process. Animal fats butyl esters (AFBE) and animal fats methyl esters (AFME) have been produced. A high efficiency of the transesterification process was obtained. It amounted to 99.2 (wt.%) for AFME and 98.9 (wt.%) for AFBE. The physicochemical properties of AFBE and AFME biodiesels, diesel fuel, and mixtures of these biodiesels and diesel fuel were tested. Most of the tested properties of AFBE were more favourable than those of AFME. The produced AFBE in relation to AFME was characterized by better cetane number, heat of combustion and calorific value, density, dynamic viscosity, kinematic viscosity, and flash point. For example, the kinematic viscosity for AFBE was 3.6 mm 2 /s and for AFME 4.1 mm 2 /s. In contrast, the calorific value of AFBE biodiesel was 39.2 MJ/kg, and that of AFME biodiesel was 38.4 MJ/kg. The use of butanol from the point of view of the properties of the produced biodiesel turned out to be more advantageous in relation to methanol. Due to the fact that the production uses waste fat, the produced biodiesels can be regarded as second-generation biofuels. Producing biodiesel from waste is a way to utilize waste and is beneficial in terms of environmental protection. It can be a way to increase the share of biofuels in the energy balance of regions where large amounts of fat waste products of animal origin are available.

Suggested Citation

  • Dariusz Kurczyński & Grzegorz Wcisło & Agnieszka Leśniak & Miłosław Kozak & Piotr Łagowski, 2022. "Production and Testing of Butyl and Methyl Esters as New Generation Biodiesels from Fatty Wastes of the Leather Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8744-:d:979152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8744/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8744/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chakraborty, R. & Sahu, H., 2014. "Intensification of biodiesel production from waste goat tallow using infrared radiation: Process evaluation through response surface methodology and artificial neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 827-836.
    2. Sander, Aleksandra & Antonije Košćak, Mihael & Kosir, Dominik & Milosavljević, Nikola & Parlov Vuković, Jelena & Magić, Lana, 2018. "The influence of animal fat type and purification conditions on biodiesel quality," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 752-760.
    3. Dariusz Kurczyński & Grzegorz Wcisło & Piotr Łagowski, 2021. "Experimental Study of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Gas Composition of a Diesel Engine Powered by Biodiesel from Waste of Animal Origin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Yahya, Salah I. & Aghel, Babak, 2021. "Estimation of kinematic viscosity of biodiesel-diesel blends: Comparison among accuracy of intelligent and empirical paradigms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 318-326.
    5. Mutreja, Vishal & Singh, Satnam & Ali, Amjad, 2011. "Biodiesel from mutton fat using KOH impregnated MgO as heterogeneous catalysts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2253-2258.
    6. Luqman Razzaq & Shahid Imran & Zahid Anwar & Muhammad Farooq & Muhammad Mujtaba Abbas & Haris Mehmood Khan & Tahir Asif & Muhammad Amjad & Manzoore Elahi M. Soudagar & Nabeel Shaukat & I. M. Rizwanul , 2020. "Maximising Yield and Engine Efficiency Using Optimised Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Alptekin, Ertan & Canakci, Mustafa, 2008. "Determination of the density and the viscosities of biodiesel–diesel fuel blends," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(12), pages 2623-2630.
    8. Shuhao Huo & Renjie Dong & Zhongming Wang & Changle Pang & Zhenhong Yuan & Shunni Zhu & Li Chen, 2011. "Available Resources for Algal Biofuel Development in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(9), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Saladini, Fabrizio & Patrizi, Nicoletta & Pulselli, Federico M. & Marchettini, Nadia & Bastianoni, Simone, 2016. "Guidelines for emergy evaluation of first, second and third generation biofuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 221-227.
    10. Öner, Cengiz & Altun, Sehmus, 2009. "Biodiesel production from inedible animal tallow and an experimental investigation of its use as alternative fuel in a direct injection diesel engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(10), pages 2114-2120, October.
    11. Rafael Estevez & Laura Aguado-Deblas & Francisco J. López-Tenllado & Carlos Luna & Juan Calero & Antonio A. Romero & Felipa M. Bautista & Diego Luna, 2022. "Biodiesel Is Dead: Long Life to Advanced Biofuels—A Comprehensive Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-39, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianhao Shen & Fengxia Zhang & Shiliang Yang & Hua Wang & Jianhang Hu, 2023. "Investigation of Pyrolysis Kinetic Triplet, Thermodynamics, Product Characteristics and Reaction Mechanism of Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel under the Influence of Copper Slag," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-22, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Łagowski & Grzegorz Wcisło & Dariusz Kurczyński, 2022. "Comparison of the Combustion Process Parameters in a Diesel Engine Powered by Second-Generation Biodiesel Compared to the First-Generation Biodiesel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Subramaniam, D. & Murugesan, A. & Avinash, A. & Kumaravel, A., 2013. "Bio-diesel production and its engine characteristics—An expatiate view," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 361-370.
    3. Mishra, Shashank & Anand, K. & Santhosh, S. & Mehta, Pramod S., 2017. "Comparison of biodiesel fuel behavior in a heavy duty turbocharged and a light duty naturally aspirated engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 459-470.
    4. Shahir, V.K. & Jawahar, C.P. & Suresh, P.R., 2015. "Comparative study of diesel and biodiesel on CI engine with emphasis to emissions—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 686-697.
    5. Masera, Kemal & Hossain, Abul Kalam, 2023. "Advancement of biodiesel fuel quality and NOx emission control techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    6. Atelge, M.R., 2022. "Production of biodiesel and hydrogen by using a double-function heterogeneous catalyst derived from spent coffee grounds and its thermodynamic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 1-15.
    7. Praveena, V. & Martin, Leenus Jesu & Matijošius, Jonas & Aloui, Fethi & Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan & Varuvel, Edwin Geo, 2024. "A systematic review on biofuel production and utilization from algae and waste feedstocks– a circular economy approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. Kumar, Niraj & Varun, & Chauhan, Sant Ram, 2013. "Performance and emission characteristics of biodiesel from different origins: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 633-658.
    9. Adewale, Peter & Dumont, Marie-Josée & Ngadi, Michael, 2015. "Recent trends of biodiesel production from animal fat wastes and associated production techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 574-588.
    10. Banković-Ilić, Ivana B. & Stojković, Ivan J. & Stamenković, Olivera S. & Veljkovic, Vlada B. & Hung, Yung-Tse, 2014. "Waste animal fats as feedstocks for biodiesel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 238-254.
    11. Chakraborty, R. & Sahu, H., 2014. "Intensification of biodiesel production from waste goat tallow using infrared radiation: Process evaluation through response surface methodology and artificial neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 827-836.
    12. Chakraborty, Rajat & Gupta, Abhishek.K. & Chowdhury, Ratul, 2014. "Conversion of slaughterhouse and poultry farm animal fats and wastes to biodiesel: Parametric sensitivity and fuel quality assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 120-134.
    13. Wan Ghazali, Wan Nor Maawa & Mamat, Rizalman & Masjuki, H.H. & Najafi, Gholamhassan, 2015. "Effects of biodiesel from different feedstocks on engine performance and emissions: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 585-602.
    14. Mohammed Kamil & Fatima M. Almarashda, 2023. "Economic Viability and Engine Performance Evaluation of Biodiesel Derived from Desert Palm Date Seeds," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Khalid Almutairi & Salem Algarni & Talal Alqahtani & Hossein Moayedi & Amir Mosavi, 2022. "A TLBO-Tuned Neural Processor for Predicting Heating Load in Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Binhweel, Fozy & Pyar, Hassan & Senusi, Wardah & Shaah, Marwan Abdulhakim & Hossain, Md Sohrab & Ahmad, Mardiana Idayu, 2023. "Utilization of marine ulva lactuca seaweed and freshwater azolla filiculoides macroalgae feedstocks toward biodiesel production: Kinetics, thermodynamics, and optimization studies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 717-730.
    17. Payri, R. & Salvador, F.J. & Gimeno, J. & De la Morena, J., 2011. "Influence of injector technology on injection and combustion development - Part 1: Hydraulic characterization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1068-1074, April.
    18. Roy, Murari Mohon & Parvez, Riaz & Sarker, Rabiul Islam, 2011. "Exhaust odor and smoke reduction of stationary DI diesel engines to acceptable level by water-scrubbing and air-dilution system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(7), pages 2391-2399, July.
    19. Goh, Brandon Han Hoe & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Cheah, Mei Yee & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Yu, Kai Ling & Mahlia, Teuku Meurah Indra, 2019. "Sustainability of direct biodiesel synthesis from microalgae biomass: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 59-74.
    20. Holmatov, B. & Hoekstra, A.Y. & Krol, M.S., 2019. "Land, water and carbon footprints of circular bioenergy production systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 224-235.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8744-:d:979152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.