IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i21p7869-d951370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hydrogen and Methane Production by Single- and Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion of Second Cheese Whey: Economic Performances and GHG Emissions Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Lembo

    (Energy Technology Department, Italian Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Development (ENEA), 00123 Rome, Italy
    Biochem SRL, Via Fratelli Rosselli 38, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy)

  • Antonella Signorini

    (Energy Technology Department, Italian Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Development (ENEA), 00123 Rome, Italy)

  • Antonella Marone

    (Energy Technology Department, Italian Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Development (ENEA), 00123 Rome, Italy)

  • Claudio Carbone

    (Energy Technology Department, Italian Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Development (ENEA), 40129 Bologna, Italy)

  • Alessandro Agostini

    (Energy Technology Department, Italian Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Development (ENEA), 00123 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the economic performances of and carbon footprint associated with innovative systems for the energetic valorization of second cheese whey (SCW), a by-product of whey cheese manufacture, through anaerobic digestion processes. Three systems were modeled: a conventional single-stage anaerobic digester (FAD), located at about 50 km from the dairy factory; an on-site conventional single-stage anaerobic digester (CAD), located at the dairy industry; and an on-site two-stage anaerobic digester (TAD). The TAD technology enables the simultaneous production of hydrogen and methane on site. The biogases produced were combusted in combined heat and power plants (CHP), but only the onsite systems provided process heat to the dairy factory. In the specific conditions assumed, TAD configuration exhibited a higher energy output, which led to a GHG emission reduction of about 60% compared to FAD, mostly thanks to the additional hydrogen (H 2 ) production and the improved engine performances. A detailed cost analysis confirmed the results of the environmental analysis, pointing to the TAD solution as the most economically viable, with a payback period of 9 years, while the CAD had a payback time of 12 years. The results here presented aim at providing the dairy industry with a robust economic analysis on the opportunity of building an innovative system for SCW valorization, as well as providing policymakers with environmental reliable data to support the promotion of this technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Lembo & Antonella Signorini & Antonella Marone & Claudio Carbone & Alessandro Agostini, 2022. "Hydrogen and Methane Production by Single- and Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion of Second Cheese Whey: Economic Performances and GHG Emissions Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:7869-:d:951370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/7869/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/7869/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sgroi, Filippo & Di Trapani, Anna Maria & Foderà, Mario & Testa, Riccardo & Tudisca, Salvatore, 2015. "Economic assessment of Eucalyptus (spp.) for biomass production as alternative crop in Southern Italy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 614-619.
    2. Kang, Jun Young & Kang, Do Won & Kim, Tong Seop & Hur, Kwang Beom, 2014. "Comparative economic analysis of gas turbine-based power generation and combined heat and power systems using biogas fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 309-318.
    3. Alessandro Agostini & Ferdinando Battini & Jacopo Giuntoli & Vincenzo Tabaglio & Monica Padella & David Baxter & Luisa Marelli & Stefano Amaducci, 2015. "Environmentally Sustainable Biogas? The Key Role of Manure Co-Digestion with Energy Crops," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-32, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amaducci, Stefano & Yin, Xinyou & Colauzzi, Michele, 2018. "Agrivoltaic systems to optimise land use for electric energy production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 545-561.
    2. Wei, Zhilong & Zhen, Haisheng & Leung, Chunwah & Cheung, Chunshun & Huang, Zuohua, 2020. "Effects of unburned gases velocity on the CO/NO2/NOx formations and overall emissions of laminar premixed biogas-hydrogen impinging flame," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Mohammadpour, Mohammadreza & Houshfar, Ehsan & Ashjaee, Mehdi & Mohammadpour, Amirreza, 2021. "Energy and exergy analysis of biogas fired regenerative gas turbine cycle with CO2 recirculation for oxy-fuel combustion power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    4. Nadia Palmieri & Alessandro Suardi & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Italian Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Eucalyptus Firewood," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Jung, Choongsoo & Park, Jungsoo & Song, Soonho, 2015. "Performance and NOx emissions of a biogas-fueled turbocharged internal combustion engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 186-195.
    6. Chia-Chi Chang & Manh Van Do & Wei-Li Hsu & Bo-Liang Liu & Ching-Yuan Chang & Yi-Hung Chen & Min-Hao Yuan & Cheng-Fang Lin & Chang-Ping Yu & Yen-Hau Chen & Je-Lueng Shie & Wan-Yi Wu & Chien-Hsien Lee , 2019. "A Case Study on the Electricity Generation Using a Micro Gas Turbine Fuelled by Biogas from a Sewage Treatment Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Jéssica Bárbara da Silva & Edvaldo Pereira Santos Júnior & João Gabriel Távora Pedrosa & Aldo Torres Sales & Everardo Valadares de Sa Barretto Sampaio & Rômulo Simões Cezar Menezes & Emmanuel Damilano, 2022. "Energetic and Economic Analysis of Spineless Cactus Biomass Production in the Brazilian Semi-arid Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk, 2020. "GHG Emissions and Efficiency of Energy Generation through Anaerobic Fermentation of Wetland Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Herz, Gregor & Reichelt, Erik & Jahn, Matthias, 2017. "Design and evaluation of a Fischer-Tropsch process for the production of waxes from biogas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 370-381.
    10. Andrea Porcu & Stefano Sollai & Davide Marotto & Mauro Mureddu & Francesca Ferrara & Alberto Pettinau, 2019. "Techno-Economic Analysis of a Small-Scale Biomass-to-Energy BFB Gasification-Based System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Agostini, A. & Colauzzi, M. & Amaducci, S., 2021. "Innovative agrivoltaic systems to produce sustainable energy: An economic and environmental assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    12. Bidart, Christian & Wichert, Martin & Kolb, Gunther & Held, Michael, 2022. "Biogas catalytic methanation for biomethane production as fuel in freight transport - A carbon footprint assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Tataraki, Kalliopi G. & Kavvadias, Konstantinos C. & Maroulis, Zacharias B., 2018. "A systematic approach to evaluate the economic viability of Combined Cooling Heating and Power systems over conventional technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 283-295.
    14. Łukasz Sobol & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Alessandro Suardi & Rainer Preißmann, 2021. "Analysis of the Possibility of Energetic Utilization of Biomass Obtained from Grass Mowing of a Large-Area Golf Course—A Case Study of Tuscany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Vo, Truc T.Q. & Rajendran, Karthik & Murphy, Jerry D., 2018. "Can power to methane systems be sustainable and can they improve the carbon intensity of renewable methane when used to upgrade biogas produced from grass and slurry?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1046-1056.
    16. Czyrnek-Delêtre, Magdalena M. & Rocca, Stefania & Agostini, Alessandro & Giuntoli, Jacopo & Murphy, Jerry D., 2017. "Life cycle assessment of seaweed biomethane, generated from seaweed sourced from integrated multi-trophic aquaculture in temperate oceanic climates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 34-50.
    17. Gazda, Wiesław & Stanek, Wojciech, 2016. "Energy and environmental assessment of integrated biogas trigeneration and photovoltaic plant as more sustainable industrial system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 138-149.
    18. Stefano Verani & Giulio Sperandio & Rodolfo Picchio & Enrico Marchi & Corrado Costa, 2015. "Sustainability Assessment of a Self-Consumption Wood-Energy Chain on Small Scale for Heat Generation in Central Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Bartoli, Andrea & Hamelin, Lorie & Rozakis, Stelios & Borzęcka, Magdalena & Brandão, Miguel, 2019. "Coupling economic and GHG emission accounting models to evaluate the sustainability of biogas policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 133-148.
    20. Batas-Bjelic, Ilija & Rajakovic, Nikola & Duic, Neven, 2017. "Smart municipal energy grid within electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1277-1285.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:7869-:d:951370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.