IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i12p2424-d242480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Case Study on the Electricity Generation Using a Micro Gas Turbine Fuelled by Biogas from a Sewage Treatment Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-Chi Chang

    (Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Manh Van Do

    (Institute of Environmental Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi 1000000, Vietnam)

  • Wei-Li Hsu

    (Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Bo-Liang Liu

    (Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Ching-Yuan Chang

    (Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan
    Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Yi-Hung Chen

    (Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Min-Hao Yuan

    (Department of Occupational Safety and Health, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan)

  • Cheng-Fang Lin

    (Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Chang-Ping Yu

    (Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Yen-Hau Chen

    (Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Je-Lueng Shie

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, National I-Lan University, Yi-Lan 260, Taiwan)

  • Wan-Yi Wu

    (Huimin Environmental Tech Corporation, Taipei 105, Taiwan)

  • Chien-Hsien Lee

    (Sewerage Systems Office, Public Works Department, Taipei City Government, Taipei 10376, Taiwan)

  • Trinh Van Tuyen

    (Institute of Environmental Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi 1000000, Vietnam)

Abstract

Combined heat and power production from biogas is now playing an important role in energy and resource utilization as well as pollution control in waste water treatment. This research used biogas from the Bali Sewage Treatment Plant in New Taipei City, Taiwan, as a major source of fuel for the electricity generation. A micro gas turbine electricity generator, Capstone CR-30, which possesses a maximum rated power load (P WL ) of 30 kW, was equipped to convert biogas into electricity. The biogas is mainly composed of CH 4 (56.1 ± 8.0 vol.%), CO 2 (25.5 ± 9.8 vol.%), H 2 (0.5 vol.%), and H 2 S (0.99 ± 0.07 ppmv). During the test operation period of the generator, it was found that the thermal efficiency increases from 19.8% to 23.4% kWh e /kWh th , while the electricity generation efficiency (η EB ) also rises from 0.93 to 1.09 kWh e /m 3 biogas as the P WL increases from 10 kW to 30 kW. The results indicated that the generator has a better performance with higher P WL . At P WL = 30 kW, the average adjusted concentrations of CO and NOx (adjusted to 15 vol.% O 2 ) emitted from the generator are 86 ppmv and 17 ppmv, respectively. Both are much lower than the emission standards of stationary sources in Taiwan of 2000 ppmv and 150 ppmv, respectively. Thus, P WL of 30 kW was selected in cooperation with biogas inflow = 0.412 m 3 /min and air/fuel ratio (i.e., air/biogas ratio) = 76.0 vol./vol. for the long-term regular operation. At the above setting conditions for long-term operation, the generator continuously consumed the biogas and provided stable electricity generation at a rate of 19.64 kWh e /h for a 2-year running period. Moreover, the greenhouse gas can be cut off with a rate of 10.78 kg CO 2 e/h when using biogas as fuel for electricity generation. Overall, this research proves that the application of a micro gas turbine electricity generator not only has promising performance for using biogas but also gives a significant reduction of greenhouse gas emission, which fits the concepts of the circular economy and environmental protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-Chi Chang & Manh Van Do & Wei-Li Hsu & Bo-Liang Liu & Ching-Yuan Chang & Yi-Hung Chen & Min-Hao Yuan & Cheng-Fang Lin & Chang-Ping Yu & Yen-Hau Chen & Je-Lueng Shie & Wan-Yi Wu & Chien-Hsien Lee , 2019. "A Case Study on the Electricity Generation Using a Micro Gas Turbine Fuelled by Biogas from a Sewage Treatment Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:12:p:2424-:d:242480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/12/2424/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/12/2424/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kanoglu, Mehmet & Dincer, Ibrahim & Rosen, Marc A., 2007. "Understanding energy and exergy efficiencies for improved energy management in power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 3967-3978, July.
    2. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2014. "Development of biogas combustion in combined heat and power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 868-875.
    3. Kang, Jun Young & Kang, Do Won & Kim, Tong Seop & Hur, Kwang Beom, 2014. "Comparative economic analysis of gas turbine-based power generation and combined heat and power systems using biogas fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 309-318.
    4. Sunhee Kim & Taehong Sung & Kyung Chun Kim, 2017. "Thermodynamic Performance Analysis of a Biogas-Fuelled Micro-Gas Turbine with a Bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle for Sewage Sludge and Food Waste Treatment Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Huopana, Tuomas & Song, Han & Kolehmainen, Mikko & Niska, Harri, 2013. "A regional model for sustainable biogas electricity production: A case study from a Finnish province," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 676-686.
    6. Patterson, Murray G, 1996. "What is energy efficiency? : Concepts, indicators and methodological issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 377-390, May.
    7. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2013. "Feasibility study of biogas production and utilization as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 454-462.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Je-Lueng Shie & Wei-Sheng Yang & Yi-Ru Liau & Tian-Hui Liau & Hong-Ren Yang, 2021. "Subcritical Hydrothermal Co-Liquefaction of Process Rejects at a Wastepaper-Based Paper Mill with Waste Soybean Oil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Panupon Trairat & Sakda Somkun & Tanakorn Kaewchum & Tawat Suriwong & Pisit Maneechot & Teerapon Panpho & Wikarn Wansungnern & Sathit Banthuek & Bongkot Prasit & Tanongkiat Kiatsiriroat, 2023. "Grid Integration of Livestock Biogas Using Self-Excited Induction Generator and Spark-Ignition Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Mariam Gómez Sánchez & Yunesky Masip Macia & Alejandro Fernández Gil & Carlos Castro & Suleivys M. Nuñez González & Jacqueline Pedrera Yanes, 2020. "A Mathematical Model for the Optimization of Renewable Energy Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdeshahian, Peyman & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 714-723.
    2. Cao, Yan & Dhahad, Hayder A. & Hussen, Hasanen M. & Anqi, Ali E. & Farouk, Naeim & Issakhov, Alibek, 2022. "Development and tri-objective optimization of a novel biomass to power and hydrogen plant: A comparison of fueling with biomass gasification or biomass digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    3. Teymoori Hamzehkolaei, Fatemeh & Amjady, Nima, 2018. "A techno-economic assessment for replacement of conventional fossil fuel based technologies in animal farms with biogas fueled CHP units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 602-614.
    4. Mohammadpour, Mohammadreza & Ashjaee, Mehdi & Houshfar, Ehsan, 2022. "Thermal performance and heat transfer characteristics analyses of oxy-biogas combustion in a swirl stabilized boiler under various oxidizing environments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    5. Shane, Agabu & Gheewala, Shabbir H. & Phiri, Seveliano, 2017. "Rural domestic biogas supply model for Zambia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 683-697.
    6. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2016. "Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 850-866.
    7. You, Huailiang & Han, Jitian & Liu, Yang, 2019. "Performance assessment of a CCHP and multi-effect desalination system based on GT/ORC with inlet air precooling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 286-298.
    8. Tripathy, Prajukta & Jena, Pabitra Kumar & Mishra, Bikash Ranjan, 2024. "Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    9. Lundgren, Tommy & Marklund, Per-Olov & Zhang, Shanshan, 2016. "Industrial energy demand and energy efficiency – Evidence from Sweden," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 130-152.
    10. Wang, Zhao-Hua & Zeng, Hua-Lin & Wei, Yi-Ming & Zhang, Yi-Xiang, 2012. "Regional total factor energy efficiency: An empirical analysis of industrial sector in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 115-123.
    11. Shoaib Azizi & Gireesh Nair & Thomas Olofsson, 2020. "Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures in Renovation of Single-Family Houses: A Comparative Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Yilmaz, Ceyhun & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2014. "Thermodynamic evaluation of geothermal energy powered hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 592-602.
    13. Ahmadi, Pouria & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2010. "Exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of a cogeneration plant system using Multimodal Genetic Algorithm (MGA)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5161-5172.
    14. Axenbeck, Janna & Niebel, Thomas, 2021. "Climate Protection Potentials of Digitalized Production Processes: Microeconometric Evidence," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238007, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    15. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2014. "Development of biogas combustion in combined heat and power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 868-875.
    16. Oliveira, Cíntia Carla Melgaço de & Brittes, José Luiz Pereira & Silveira Junior, Vivaldo, 2019. "Dynamic operating conditions strategy for water hybrid cooling under variable heating demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 635-645.
    17. Wenxuan Ma, 2022. "Exploring the Role of Educational Human Capital and Green Finance in Total-Factor Energy Efficiency in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Román-Collado, Rocío & Colinet, María José, 2018. "Are labour productivity and residential living standards drivers of the energy consumption changes?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 746-756.
    19. Anna Barwińska Małajowicz & Miroslava Knapková & Krzysztof Szczotka & Miriam Martinkovičová & Radosław Pyrek, 2022. "Energy Efficiency Policies in Poland and Slovakia in the Context of Individual Well-Being," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-29, December.
    20. Geng, Jiang-Bo & Ji, Qiang, 2014. "Multi-perspective analysis of China's energy supply security," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 541-550.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:12:p:2424-:d:242480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.