IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i19p7229-d931339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Long-Term Tightness of the Coal Pillar Dam of Underground Reservoir and Protection Countermeasures

Author

Listed:
  • Zhixin Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining, Beijing 100011, China
    State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Qiang Guo

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining, Beijing 100011, China)

  • Wei Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining, Beijing 100011, China
    State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

Abstract

The coal mine underground reservoir is an effective facility for mine groundwater utilization in water-deficient and ecologically fragile areas. Usually, the artificial reserved coal pillar is used as the dam of underground reservoir, and little research has been done on its tightness performance. Comsol software is used to simulate the leakage of underground reservoirs in Shendong area, in the western part of China, and the long-term tightness of coal pillar dam under different operation conditions is evaluated. The results show that: (1) When the underground reservoir is not connected with the upper water system, the coal pillar dam has good tightness performance. When they are connected, the leakage of reservoir increased due to the raised water level, and the deeper the burial depth, the greater the leakage amount. (2) When reservoir is pumping and storing water, the leakage is only half of that under constant water pressure storage, indicating that this operation mode is beneficial to the long-term tightness of a coal pillar dam. (3) With the increase of the permeability of a coal pillar dam, the leakage will be aggravated. It is suggested that the permeability of a coal pillar dam should not exceed 1 × 10 −15 m 2 . (4) The tightness of the coal pillar dam damaged by brine immersion is greatly reduced. With only 3 m of soaking damage distance, the total leakage is twice that of the undamaged one. For a coal pillar dam with poor tightness, some protection countermeasures are proposed to reduce the reservoir water level or improve the anti-seepage performance of a coal pillar dam, so as to ensure the long-term tightness of the dam. This research can provide theoretical support and technical guidance for evaluating the seepage stability of a coal pillar dam in an underground reservoir and strengthening its seepage control.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhixin Zhang & Qiang Guo & Wei Liu, 2022. "Evaluation of Long-Term Tightness of the Coal Pillar Dam of Underground Reservoir and Protection Countermeasures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7229-:d:931339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7229/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7229/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menéndez, Javier & Loredo, Jorge & Galdo, Mónica & Fernández-Oro, Jesús M., 2019. "Energy storage in underground coal mines in NW Spain: Assessment of an underground lower water reservoir and preliminary energy balance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1381-1391.
    2. Estanislao Pujades & Philippe Orban & Pierre Archambeau & Vasileios Kitsikoudis & Sebastien Erpicum & Alain Dassargues, 2020. "Underground Pumped-Storage Hydropower (UPSH) at the Martelange Mine (Belgium): Interactions with Groundwater Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Vasileios Kitsikoudis & Pierre Archambeau & Benjamin Dewals & Estanislao Pujades & Philippe Orban & Alain Dassargues & Michel Pirotton & Sebastien Erpicum, 2020. "Underground Pumped-Storage Hydropower (UPSH) at the Martelange Mine (Belgium): Underground Reservoir Hydraulics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Gao, Renbo & Wu, Fei & Zou, Quanle & Chen, Jie, 2022. "Optimal dispatching of wind-PV-mine pumped storage power station: A case study in Lingxin Coal Mine in Ningxia Province, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Fan, Jinyang & Xie, Heping & Chen, Jie & Jiang, Deyi & Li, Cunbao & Ngaha Tiedeu, William & Ambre, Julien, 2020. "Preliminary feasibility analysis of a hybrid pumped-hydro energy storage system using abandoned coal mine goafs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qianjun Chen & Zhengmeng Hou & Xuning Wu & Shengyou Zhang & Wei Sun & Yanli Fang & Lin Wu & Liangchao Huang & Tian Zhang, 2023. "A Two-Step Site Selection Concept for Underground Pumped Hydroelectric Energy Storage and Potential Estimation of Coal Mines in Henan Province," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Vasileios Kitsikoudis & Pierre Archambeau & Benjamin Dewals & Estanislao Pujades & Philippe Orban & Alain Dassargues & Michel Pirotton & Sebastien Erpicum, 2020. "Underground Pumped-Storage Hydropower (UPSH) at the Martelange Mine (Belgium): Underground Reservoir Hydraulics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Xin Zhou & Yuejin Zhou & Xiaoding Xu & Chunlin Zeng & Chaobin Zhu, 2023. "Hydraulic Characteristics Analysis of Double-Bend Roadway of Abandoned Mine Pumped Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Xin Lyu & Tong Zhang & Liang Yuan & Ke Yang & Juejing Fang & Shanshan Li & Shuai Liu, 2022. "Pumped Storage Hydropower in Abandoned Mine Shafts: Key Concerns and Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Reinhard Madlener & Jan Martin Specht, 2020. "An Exploratory Economic Analysis of Underground Pumped-Storage Hydro Power Plants in Abandoned Deep Coal Mines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Estanislao Pujades & Philippe Orban & Pierre Archambeau & Vasileios Kitsikoudis & Sebastien Erpicum & Alain Dassargues, 2020. "Underground Pumped-Storage Hydropower (UPSH) at the Martelange Mine (Belgium): Interactions with Groundwater Flow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Jurasz, Jakub & Piasecki, Adam & Hunt, Julian & Zheng, Wandong & Ma, Tao & Kies, Alexander, 2022. "Building integrated pumped-storage potential on a city scale: An analysis based on geographic information systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    8. Mahfoud, Rabea Jamil & Alkayem, Nizar Faisal & Zhang, Yuquan & Zheng, Yuan & Sun, Yonghui & Alhelou, Hassan Haes, 2023. "Optimal operation of pumped hydro storage-based energy systems: A compendium of current challenges and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Gao, Renbo & Wu, Fei & Zou, Quanle & Chen, Jie, 2022. "Optimal dispatching of wind-PV-mine pumped storage power station: A case study in Lingxin Coal Mine in Ningxia Province, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    10. Małgorzata Jastrzębska, 2022. "Installation’s Conception in the Field of Renewable Energy Sources for the Needs of the Silesian Botanical Garden," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    11. Jarosław Kulpa & Paweł Kamiński & Kinga Stecuła & Dariusz Prostański & Piotr Matusiak & Daniel Kowol & Michał Kopacz & Piotr Olczak, 2021. "Technical and Economic Aspects of Electric Energy Storage in a Mine Shaft—Budryk Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz & Magdalena Zioło & Marek Dylewski, 2021. "Dynamic Analysis of the Similarity of Objects in Research on the Use of Renewable Energy Resources in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    13. Liu, Wei & Zhang, Zhixin & Chen, Jie & Jiang, Deyi & Wu, Fei & Fan, Jinyang & Li, Yinping, 2020. "Feasibility evaluation of large-scale underground hydrogen storage in bedded salt rocks of China: A case study in Jiangsu province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    14. Yi Zhang & Wenjing Li & Guodong Chen, 2022. "A Thermodynamic Model for Carbon Dioxide Storage in Underground Salt Caverns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Tao, Meng & Jl, Xie & Xm, Li & Jw, Ma & Yang, Yue, 2020. "Experimental study on the evolutional trend of pore structures and fractal dimension of low-rank coal rich clay subjected to a coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    16. Zhong, Xiaohui & Chen, Tao & Sun, Xiangyu & Song, Juanjuan & Zeng, Jiajun, 2022. "Conventional and advanced exergy analysis of a novel wind-to-heat system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    17. Candra Saigustia & Sylwester Robak, 2021. "Review of Potential Energy Storage in Abandoned Mines in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Héctor Álvarez & Guillermo Domínguez & Almudena Ordóñez & Javier Menéndez & Rodrigo Álvarez & Jorge Loredo, 2021. "Mine Water for the Generation and Storage of Renewable Energy: A Hybrid Hydro–Wind System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Liang, Xiaopeng & Ma, Hongling & Cai, Rui & Zhao, Kai & Zeng, Zhen & Li, Hang & Yang, Chunhe, 2023. "Feasibility analysis of natural gas storage in the voids of sediment within salt cavern——A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    20. Zhang, Zhengjia & Wang, Qingxiang & Liu, Zhengguang & Chen, Qi & Guo, Zhiling & Zhang, Haoran, 2023. "Renew mineral resource-based cities: Assessment of PV potential in coal mining subsidence areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7229-:d:931339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.