IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i18p6625-d911613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Social Return Potential of Micro Hydropower in Water Networks Based on Demonstrator Examples

Author

Listed:
  • Kemi Adeyeye

    (Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK)

  • John Gallagher

    (Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, the University of College Green, 2 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Helena M. Ramos

    (Civil Engineering, Architecture and Georesources Department, CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Aonghus McNabola

    (Department of Civil, Structural & Environmental Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, the University of College Green, 2 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

Micro hydropower (MHP) provides a viable renewable energy solution from which individuals, organisations and communities can also derive social value and benefits. Desk studies and literature reviews show limited studies that (a) quantify the social impact of MHPs in water networks and (b), establish evaluation methods for such analysis. To date, most studies relating to MHP projects have focused on physical and technological parameters, as well as cost and environmental factors that influence their design, installation, operation, and maintenance. Less attention has been given to the intangible social, political, and institutional considerations, which are also important for the acceptability and adoption of renewables such as MHPs, and for their performative longevity. This study addresses these gaps. The social return on investment (SROI) method was used as the basis to quantify the cost and social returns of three MHP demonstrators in a public and private water supply, and irrigation network in Europe. The value inputs and outputs from each case were analysed and a SROI range of between 2.6 and 5.8 euros for each one euro invested was determined. The findings were further evaluated using sensitivity tests. This work serves as a useful first step to establishing a SROI benchmark range for MHP schemes in water networks, extrapolatable for other renewable energy interventions. They also highlight the opportunities and challenges of quantifying and forecasting the social returns of MHPs to guide future work.

Suggested Citation

  • Kemi Adeyeye & John Gallagher & Helena M. Ramos & Aonghus McNabola, 2022. "The Social Return Potential of Micro Hydropower in Water Networks Based on Demonstrator Examples," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6625-:d:911613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6625/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6625/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yates, Brian T. & Marra, Mita, 2017. "Social Return On Investment (SROI): Problems, solutions … and is SROI a good investment?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 136-144.
    2. Oreste Fecarotta & Aonghus McNabola, 2017. "Optimal Location of Pump as Turbines (PATs) in Water Distribution Networks to Recover Energy and Reduce Leakage," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(15), pages 5043-5059, December.
    3. Giovanni Lombardo & Andrea Mazzocchetti & Irene Rapallo & Nader Tayser & Silvano Cincotti, 2019. "Assessment of the Economic and Social Impact Using SROI: An Application to Sport Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Ricciuti, Elisa & Bufali, Maria Vittoria, 2019. "The health and social impact of Blood Donors Associations: A Social Return on Investment (SROI) analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 204-213.
    5. Kougias, Ioannis & Aggidis, George & Avellan, François & Deniz, Sabri & Lundin, Urban & Moro, Alberto & Muntean, Sebastian & Novara, Daniele & Pérez-Díaz, Juan Ignacio & Quaranta, Emanuele & Schild, P, 2019. "Analysis of emerging technologies in the hydropower sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Kemi Adeyeye & John Gallagher & Aonghus McNabola & Helena M. Ramos & Paul Coughlan, 2021. "Socio-Technical Viability Framework for Micro Hydropower in Group Water-Energy Schemes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Chacón, Miguel Crespo & Rodríguez Díaz, Juan Antonio & Morillo, Jorge García & McNabola, Aonghus, 2021. "Evaluation of the design and performance of a micro hydropower plant in a pressurised irrigation network: Real world application at farm-level in Southern Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1106-1120.
    8. Cordes, Joseph J., 2017. "Using cost-benefit analysis and social return on investment to evaluate the impact of social enterprise: Promises, implementation, and limitations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 98-104.
    9. Sternberg, R., 2008. "Hydropower: Dimensions of social and environmental coexistence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 1588-1621, August.
    10. Bracken, L.J. & Bulkeley, H.A. & Maynard, C.M., 2014. "Micro-hydro power in the UK: The role of communities in an emerging energy resource," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 92-101.
    11. Yates, Brian T. & Marra, Mita, 2017. "Introduction: Social Return On Investment (SROI)," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 95-97.
    12. Boliko, Charles M. & Ialnazov, Dimiter S., 2019. "An assessment of rural electrification projects in Kenya using a sustainability framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ngarava, Saul & Mushunje, Abbyssinia & Chaminuka, Petronella, 2020. "Qualitative benefits of livestock development programmes. Evidence from the Kaonafatso ya Dikgomo (KyD) Scheme in South Africa," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Thomas Pirard & Vasileios Kitsikoudis & Sebastien Erpicum & Michel Pirotton & Pierre Archambeau & Benjamin Dewals, 2022. "Discharge Redistribution as a Key Process for Heuristic Optimization of Energy Production with Pumps as Turbines in a Water Distribution Network," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(4), pages 1237-1250, March.
    3. syam, muhammad alvin arkananta, 2020. "Seluk Beluk Metode Analisis Social Returns on Investment," OSF Preprints hrpuz, Center for Open Science.
    4. Yates, Brian T., 2021. "Toward collaborative cost-inclusive evaluation: Adaptations and transformations for evaluators and economists," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. Ortega, Jason A. & Park, Chul Hyun, 2022. "The benefit and cost of voluntary work in government: The case of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Boat Crew Program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Andrea Di Francesco & Maria Pinelli & Emanuele Lettieri & Giovanni Toletti & Manuela Galli, 2023. "Towards a More Inclusive Society: The Social Return on Investment (SROI) of an Innovative Ankle–Foot Orthosis for Hemiplegic Children," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Winatha, Arvin, 2020. "Metode Popular SROI dan Aplikasinya di Kehidupan Nyata," OSF Preprints j4qus, Center for Open Science.
    8. Maria-Teresa Bosch-Badia & Joan Montllor-Serrats & Maria-Antonia Tarrazon-Rodon, 2020. "The Capital Budgeting of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-28, April.
    9. Kemi Adeyeye & John Gallagher & Aonghus McNabola & Helena M. Ramos & Paul Coughlan, 2021. "Socio-Technical Viability Framework for Micro Hydropower in Group Water-Energy Schemes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Antoni F. Tulla & Ana Vera & Carles Guirado & Natàlia Valldeperas, 2020. "The Return on Investment in Social Farming: A Strategy for Sustainable Rural Development in Rural Catalonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    11. Iluminada Fuertes-Fuertes & J. David Cabedo & Inmaculada Jimeno-García, 2019. "Capturing the Invisible Wealth in Nonprofits to Overcome Myopic Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Andrzej Kokiel & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń & Jacek Stasiak, 2022. "Hydropower in the Energy Market in Poland and the Baltic States in the Light of the Challenges of Sustainable Development-An Overview of the Current State and Development Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Darie Casiana Maria, 2023. "The Link between Business Benefits and ERP Systems: A Bibliometric Analysis," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1957-1966, July.
    14. Kumar, Deepak & Katoch, S.S., 2015. "Sustainability suspense of small hydropower projects: A study from western Himalayan region of India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 220-233.
    15. Marco van Dijk & Stefanus Johannes van Vuuren & Giovanna Cavazzini & Chantel Monica Niebuhr & Alberto Santolin, 2022. "Optimizing Conduit Hydropower Potential by Determining Pareto-Optimal Trade-Off Curve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Eva Bílková & Jiří Souček & Martin Kantor & Roman Kubíček & Petr Nowak, 2023. "Variable-Speed Propeller Turbine for Small Hydropower Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Krzysztof Bartczak & Stanisław Łobejko, 2022. "The Implementation Environment for a Digital Technology Platform of Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Raul-Alexandru Szakal & Alexandru Doman & Sebastian Muntean, 2021. "Influence of the Reshaped Elbow on the Unsteady Pressure Field in a Simplified Geometry of the Draft Tube," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Oreste Fecarotta & Armando Carravetta & Maria Cristina Morani & Roberta Padulano, 2018. "Optimal Pump Scheduling for Urban Drainage under Variable Flow Conditions," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Osama Abied & Othman Ibrahim & Siti Nuur-Ila Mat Kamal & Ibrahim M. Alfadli & Weam M. Binjumah & Norafida Ithnin & Maged Nasser, 2022. "Probing Determinants Affecting Intention to Adopt Cloud Technology in E-Government Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6625-:d:911613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.