IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v94y2022ics0149718922000751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The benefit and cost of voluntary work in government: The case of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Boat Crew Program

Author

Listed:
  • Ortega, Jason A.
  • Park, Chul Hyun

Abstract

This research aimed to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of a volunteer program. The literature lacked empirical evidence on the cost efficiency of voluntary work in the public-sector context. Most previous studies have paid attention to the cases of nonprofit organizations, although there have been many volunteer programs in public organizations. In this research, we focused on the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Boat Crew Program which may help distressed boaters in distress, patrol regattas and marine events, and assist in maritime observations. We discovered that approximately $1.39 million was invested in volunteers to run the boat crew program for 2019. We also estimated the total monetary benefit of volunteer contributions by using the replacement cost method. As a result, we found that 5369 volunteers contributed approximately 199,000 h to the boat crew program in 2019. It means that the program extended the equivalent of 104 full-time Coast Guard personnel in 2019. The total economic benefit attributed to the volunteer contributions of labor ranged from $4.8 million to $5.4 million. Therefore, for every dollar the Coast Guard invested in the volunteer program, they obtained an additional return of $3.42 to $3.89 from volunteer contributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ortega, Jason A. & Park, Chul Hyun, 2022. "The benefit and cost of voluntary work in government: The case of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Boat Crew Program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:94:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000751
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718922000751
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yvon H. Pho, 2008. "The Value Of Volunteer Labor And The Factors Influencing Participation: Evidence For The United States From 2002 Through 2005," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 54(2), pages 220-236, June.
    2. Geletko, K.W. & Beitsch, L.M. & Lundberg, M. & Brooks, R.G., 2009. "Reducing the impact of the health care access crisis through volunteerism: A means, not an end," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(7), pages 1166-1169.
    3. Yates, Brian T. & Marra, Mita, 2017. "Introduction: Social Return On Investment (SROI)," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 95-97.
    4. Carolyn J. Cordery & Sarah Proctor-Thomson & Karen A Smith, 2011. "Valuing volunteer contributions to charities," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 193-200, May.
    5. Rocco Palumbo & Stefania Vezzosi & Paola Picciolli & Alessandro Landini & Carmela Annarumma & Rosalba Manna, 2018. "Fostering organizational change through co-production. Insights from an Italian experience," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 371-391, September.
    6. Harold Levrel & Benoit Fontaine & Pierre-Yves Henry & Frédéric Jiguet & Romain Julliard & Christian Kerbiriou & Denis Couvet, 2010. "Balancing state and volunteer investment in biodiversity monitoring for the implementation of CBD indicators: A French example," Post-Print hal-00511660, HAL.
    7. Levrel, Harold & Fontaine, Benoît & Henry, Pierre-Yves & Jiguet, Frédéric & Julliard, Romain & Kerbiriou, Christian & Couvet, Denis, 2010. "Balancing state and volunteer investment in biodiversity monitoring for the implementation of CBD indicators: A French example," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1580-1586, May.
    8. Ricciuti, Elisa & Bufali, Maria Vittoria, 2019. "The health and social impact of Blood Donors Associations: A Social Return on Investment (SROI) analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 204-213.
    9. Laurie Mook & Jack Quarter, 2006. "Accounting for the social economy: the socioeconomic impact statement," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(2), pages 247-269, June.
    10. Lester M. Salamon & S. Wojciech Sokolowski & Megan A. Haddock, 2011. "Measuring The Economic Value Of Volunteer Work Globally: Concepts, Estimates, And A Roadmap To The Future," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 82(3), pages 217-252, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. syam, muhammad alvin arkananta, 2020. "Seluk Beluk Metode Analisis Social Returns on Investment," OSF Preprints hrpuz, Center for Open Science.
    2. Kemi Adeyeye & John Gallagher & Helena M. Ramos & Aonghus McNabola, 2022. "The Social Return Potential of Micro Hydropower in Water Networks Based on Demonstrator Examples," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Bhattacharya, Tania Ray & Managi, Shunsuke, 2012. "Contributions of the private sector to global biodiversity protection: case study of the fortune 500 companies," MPRA Paper 39949, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Martin, Jean-Christophe & Mongruel, Rémi & Levrel, Harold, 2018. "Integrating Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Ecosystem Satellite Account: A Case Study in the Gulf of Saint-Malo (France)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 141-152.
    5. Hyder, Kieran & Townhill, Bryony & Anderson, Lucy G. & Delany, Jane & Pinnegar, John K., 2015. "Can citizen science contribute to the evidence-base that underpins marine policy?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 112-120.
    6. Fang Li & Hongxu Ma & Suyan Shen, 2024. "Volunteering in China: How significant is the peer effect?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 1848-1865, April.
    7. Pamela Wicker & Christoph Breuer, 2015. "How the Economic and Financial Situation of the Community Affects Sport Clubs’ Resources: Evidence from Multi-Level Models," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Federica VIGANO & Andrea SALUSTRI, 2015. "Matching profit and Non-profit Needs: How NPOs and Cooperative Contribute to Growth in Time of Crisis. A Quantitative Approach," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(1), pages 157-178, March.
    9. Franz Hackl & Martin Halla & Gerald Pruckner, 2012. "Volunteering and the state," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 465-495, June.
    10. Alexander W. Cappelen & Bjørn-Atle Reme & Erik Ø. Sørensen & Bertil Tungodden, 2016. "Leadership and Incentives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(7), pages 1944-1953, July.
    11. Ramadhan, Rizki Akbar, 2020. "Keunikan Dalam Mempelajari SROI," OSF Preprints fn3ca, Center for Open Science.
    12. Carolyn J. Cordery & Karen A. Smith & Harry Berger, 2017. "Future scenarios for the charity sector in 2045," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 189-196, April.
    13. Peter Tyler & Colin Warnock & Allan Provins & Bruno Lanz, 2013. "Valuing the Benefits of Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(1), pages 169-190, January.
    14. Paul R Armsworth & Lisette Cantú-Salazar & Mark Parnell & Josephine E Booth & Rob Stoneman & Zoe G Davies, 2013. "Opportunities for Cost-Sharing in Conservation: Variation in Volunteering Effort across Protected Areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, January.
    15. Yates, Brian T., 2021. "Toward collaborative cost-inclusive evaluation: Adaptations and transformations for evaluators and economists," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Diego Juffe-Bignoli & Thomas M Brooks & Stuart H M Butchart & Richard B Jenkins & Kaia Boe & Michael Hoffmann & Ariadne Angulo & Steve Bachman & Monika Böhm & Neil Brummitt & Kent E Carpenter & Pat J , 2016. "Assessing the Cost of Global Biodiversity and Conservation Knowledge," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.
    17. Alzuabi, Raslan & Brown, Sarah & Taylor, Karl, 2022. "Charitable behaviour and political affiliation: Evidence for the UK," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    18. Andrea Di Francesco & Maria Pinelli & Emanuele Lettieri & Giovanni Toletti & Manuela Galli, 2023. "Towards a More Inclusive Society: The Social Return on Investment (SROI) of an Innovative Ankle–Foot Orthosis for Hemiplegic Children," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Ando, Amy W. & Cadavid, Catalina Londoño & Netusil, Noelwah R. & Parthum, Bryan, 2020. "Willingness-to-volunteer and stability of preferences between cities: Estimating the benefits of stormwater management," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Cristina Coscia & Subhash Mukerjee & Bianca Ludovica Palmieri & Chiara Quintanal Rivacoba, 2020. "Enhancing the Sustainability of Social Housing Policies through the Social Impact Approach: Innovative Perspectives form a “Paris Affordable Housing Challenge” Project in France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:94:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.