IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i16p5880-d887535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pressure Drop Prediction of Crude Oil Pipeline Based on PSO-BP Neural Network

Author

Listed:
  • Lixin Wei

    (Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, Northeast Petroleum University, Ministry of Education, Daqing 163318, China)

  • Yu Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, Northeast Petroleum University, Ministry of Education, Daqing 163318, China)

  • Lili Ji

    (Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, Northeast Petroleum University, Ministry of Education, Daqing 163318, China)

  • Lin Ye

    (Bohai Petroleum Institute, Tianjin Branch of CNOOC China Limited, Tianjin 300452, China)

  • Xuanchen Zhu

    (Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, Northeast Petroleum University, Ministry of Education, Daqing 163318, China)

  • Jin Fu

    (Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, Northeast Petroleum University, Ministry of Education, Daqing 163318, China)

Abstract

Pipeline transportation of crude oil has great advantages over traditional oil transmission methods, in terms of economic and environmental protection. The main costs in the oilfield surface system are the fuel costs for heating the crude oil during transportation and the electricity costs for the pumping units. In the northeast of China, where winter temperatures are extremely low and the oil has a high freezing point and high viscosity, higher temperatures, and pressures are required to transport crude oil. With machine learning widely used in many industries and achieving better results, the digital management of oil pipelines has stored a large amount of production and operation data, which has laid the foundation for the research of oil pipeline process calculation using machine learning methods. In this paper, a crude oil pressure drop calculation of an oil pipeline in Northeast China is carried out based on a neural network. For pipeline pressure drop calculation, the back propagation neural network (BP) pressure drop calculation model and particle swarm optimization for back propagation neuron network (PSO-BP) pressure drop calculation model are established. Two models were used to calculate and compare the measured data, and the average absolute error of the PSO-BP model was the smallest, which was 0.015%. Compared with the BP model, the average relative error is reduced by 13.16%. Therefore, The PSO-BP pressure drop calculation model has high accuracy and is of practical significance for predicting pipeline pressure drop.

Suggested Citation

  • Lixin Wei & Yu Zhang & Lili Ji & Lin Ye & Xuanchen Zhu & Jin Fu, 2022. "Pressure Drop Prediction of Crude Oil Pipeline Based on PSO-BP Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-12, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5880-:d:887535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5880/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5880/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiezhu Sun & Xiaojun Huang & Caihang Liang & Riming Liu & Xiang Huang, 2022. "Prediction and Analysis of Dew Point Indirect Evaporative Cooler Performance by Artificial Neural Network Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Wei Han & Lingbo Nan & Min Su & Yu Chen & Rennian Li & Xuejing Zhang, 2019. "Research on the Prediction Method of Centrifugal Pump Performance Based on a Double Hidden Layer BP Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Yuan Guo & Ge Xiong & Liangcai Zeng & Qingfeng Li, 2021. "Modeling and Predictive Analysis of Small Internal Leakage of Hydraulic Cylinder Based on Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grzegorz Filo, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence Methods in Hydraulic System Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Jia Li & Xin Wang & Yue Wang & Wancheng Wang & Baibing Chen & Xiaolong Chen, 2020. "Effects of a Combination Impeller on the Flow Field and External Performance of an Aero-Fuel Centrifugal Pump," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Joanna Fabis-Domagala & Mariusz Domagala, 2022. "A Concept of Risk Prioritization in FMEA of Fluid Power Components," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Min Yi & Wei Xie & Li Mo, 2021. "Short-Term Electricity Price Forecasting Based on BP Neural Network Optimized by SAPSO," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Joanna Fabis-Domagala & Mariusz Domagala & Hassan Momeni, 2021. "A Concept of Risk Prioritization in FMEA Analysis for Fluid Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Huican Luo & Peijian Zhou & Lingfeng Shu & Jiegang Mou & Haisheng Zheng & Chenglong Jiang & Yantian Wang, 2022. "Energy Performance Curves Prediction of Centrifugal Pumps Based on Constrained PSO-SVR Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Xiongchao Lin & Wenshuai Xi & Jinze Dai & Caihong Wang & Yonggang Wang, 2020. "Prediction of Slag Characteristics Based on Artificial Neural Network for Molten Gasification of Hazardous Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Zhang, Yiming & Li, Jingxiang & Fei, Liangyu & Feng, Zhiyan & Gao, Jingzhou & Yan, Wenpeng & Zhao, Shengdun, 2023. "Operational performance estimation of vehicle electric coolant pump based on the ISSA-BP neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    9. Ji-Quan Wang & Hong-Yu Zhang & Hao-Hao Song & Pan-Li Zhang & Jin-Ling Bei, 2022. "Prediction of Pork Supply Based on Improved Mayfly Optimization Algorithm and BP Neural Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Eslam Mohammed Abdelkader & Nehal Elshaboury & Abobakr Al-Sakkaf, 2022. "On the Utilization of an Ensemble of Meta-Heuristics for Simulating Energy Consumption in Buildings," International Journal of Applied Metaheuristic Computing (IJAMC), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-31, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5880-:d:887535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.